ORBIS SCHOLAE
ORBIS SCHOLAE

Oznamujeme autorům a čtenářům, že po dohodě s nakladatelstvím Karolinum bude od roku 2024 (ročník 18) časopis Orbis scholae vycházet pouze v elektronické podobě.

Orbis scholae je odborný recenzovaný časopis zaměřený na problematiku školního vzdělávání v jeho širších sociokulturních souvislostech. Cílem časopisu je přispět k porozumění školnímu vzdělávání a jeho rozvoji, k řešení problémů praxe a vzdělávací politiky.

Časopis je zařazen do databází SCOPUS, CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO a ERIH Plus.

ORBIS SCHOLAE, Vol 12 No 3 (2018), 109–126

Mobbing a jeho role ve vnímání klimatu školy učiteli

[Workplace Bullying and Its Role in the Teacher’s Perception of the School Climate]

Tomáš Čech, Simona Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, Jana Kvintová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2019.9
zveřejněno: 26. 07. 2019

Abstract

The quality of the education and training process is closely linked to the overall quality of the school climate and interpersonal relationships, and the concept of bullying in the workplace, is more and more related to the school environment when it involves forms of psychological attacks among teachers. It is logical that if this negative phenomenon occurs in the school environment, it is a serious ethical problem that can fundamentally influence the quality of the climate in the school and therefore also the functioning of the school as an educational institution. The main objective of our study was to map out how basic school teachers perceive their workplaces and interpersonal relationships within them. The partial aim of this research was to find out how school climate teachers perceived being victims or witnesses to the bullying of their colleagues compared to teachers without this negative experience. To obtain the data a one-dimensional assessment scale was used to measure the perception of the social climate among the teaching staff. A Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-R) questionnaire was used to identify teachers who experienced bullying at the workplace (bystanders and victims). The research sample consisted of 313 basic school teachers from the Olomouc Region, of which 59 were men and 254 women. The results of the survey point to the fact that teachers who have been victims or witnesses of mobbing perceive the climate of the teaching staff signifi cantly more negatively than teachers without this negative experience.

klíčová slova: school; school climate; aggression; bullying at the workplace; mobbing

reference (52)

1. Agervold, M., & Mikkelsen, E. G. (2004). Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work & Stress, 18(4), 336-351. CrossRef

2. Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 368-420. CrossRef

3. Beňo, P. (2003). Můj šéf, můj nepřítel? Šlapanice: Era.

4. Bulach, C., & Malone, B. (1994). The relationship of school climate to the implementation of school reform. Ers Spectrum, 12(4), 3-8.

5. Cakirpaloglu, P., Šmahaj, J., Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, S., & Zielina, M. (2016). Šikana na pracovišti v České republice: Teorie, výzkum a praxe. Olomouc: UP. CrossRef

6. Cakirpaloglu, P., Šmahaj, J., Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, S., & Zielina, M. (2017). Šikana na pracovišti: Reliabilita a validita českého překladu revidované verze dotazníku negativních aktů NAQ-R. Československá psychologie, 61(6), 546-558. CrossRef

7. Čech, T. (2010). Mobbing v základních školách jako etický problém. E-pedagogium, 10(2), 9-19. CrossRef

8. Čech, T. (2011). Mobbing jako negativní fenomén v prostředí základních škol. Brno: MU.

9. Čech, T., Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, S., & Kvintová, J. (2017). Workplace bullying - coping strategies of teachers. In P. A. da Silva Pereira, O. Titrek, & G. Sezen-Gultekin (Eds.), Iclel 17 conference proceeding book (s. 416-424). Sakarya: Sakarya University.

10. Čech, T., & Kantor, D. (2010). Fenomén mobbingu a bossingu v českých školách. Mládež a spoločnosť, 16(1), 64-78.

11. Dobešová Cakirpaloglu, S., Čech, T., & Kvintová, J. (2017). The incidence of workplace bullying in Czech teachers. In P. A. da Silva Pereira, O. Titrek, & G. Sezen-Gultekin (Eds.), Iclel 17 conference proceeding book (s. 425-431). Sakarya: Sakarya University.

12. Einarsen, S. (2000). Harasment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Agression and Violent Behavior, 5(4), 379-401. CrossRef

13. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Notelaers, G. (2009). Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work & Stress, 23(1), 24-44. CrossRef

14. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2011). The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (s. 3-40). London: Taylor & Francis. CrossRef

15. Einarsen, S., Raknes, B. R. I., & Matthiesen, S. B. (1994). Bullying and harassment at work and their relationships to work environment quality: An exploratory study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 4(4), 381-401. CrossRef

16. Grecmanová, H. (2003). Klima školy v německé pedagogické literatuře. In S. Ježek (Ed.), Psychosociální klima školy I (s. 75-86). Brno: MU.

17. Grecmanová, H. (2008). Klima školy. Olomouc: Hanex.

18. Halpin, A. W., & Croft, D. B. (1963). The organizational climate of schools. Chicago: University of Chicago.

19. Hoel, H., & Cooper, C. L. (2000). Destructive conflict and bullying at work. Manchester: Manchester School of Management, UMIST.

20. Hoel, H., & Einarsen, S. (1999). Workplace bullying. John Wiley & Sons.

21. Høgh, A., Hansen, Å. M., Mikkelsen, E. G., & Persson, R. (2012). Exposure to negative acts at work, psychological stress reactions and physiological stress response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73(1), 47-52. CrossRef

22. Ježek, S. (Ed.). (2003). Psychosociální klima školy I. Brno: MSD.

23. Keashly, L., & Jagatic, K. (2011). North American perspectives on hostile behaviors and bullying at work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (s. 41-71). London: Taylor & Francis. CrossRef

24. Kelley, R. C., Thornton, B., & Daugherty, R. (2005) Relationships between measures of leadership and school climate. Education, 126(1), 17-25.

25. Kivimäki, M., Virtanen, M., Vartia, M., Elovainio, M., Vahtera, J., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2003). Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(10), 779-783. CrossRef

26. Kottkamp, R., & Mulhern, J., & Hoy, W. K. (1987). Secondary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(3), 31-48. CrossRef

27. Lašek, J. (2007). Sociálně psychologické klima školních tříd a školy. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.

28. Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 165-184. CrossRef

29. Lutgen-Sandvik, P. (2013). Adult bullying - a nasty piece of work: Translating a decade of research on non-sexual harassment, psychological terror, mobbing, and emotional abuse on the job. St. Louis: ORCM Academic Press.

30. Mareš, J., & Křivohlavý, J. (1995). Komunikace ve škole. Brno: MU.

31. Moayed, F. A., Daraiseh, N., Shell, R., & Salem, S. (2006). Workplace bullying: A systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7(3), 311-327. CrossRef

32. Nielsen, M. B., & Einarsen, S. (2012). Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: A meta-analytic review. Work & Stress, 26(4), 309-332. CrossRef

33. Paull, M., Omari, M., & Standen, P. (2012). When is a bystander not a bystander? A typology of the roles of bystanders in workplace bullying. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 50(3), 351-366. CrossRef

34. Pekrun, R. (1985). Schulklima. In W. Twellmann (Ed.), Handbuch Schule und Unterricht (s. 524-547). Düsseldorf: Schwann.

35. Petlák, E. (2006). Klíma školy a klíma triedy. Bratislava: Iris.

36. Salin, D. (2001). Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 425-441. CrossRef

37. Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213-1232. CrossRef

38. Salin, D. (2011). The significance of gender for third parties' perceptions of negative interpersonal behaviour: Labelling and explaining negative acts. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(6), 571-591. CrossRef

39. Sekera, J., & Janáček, Z. (1994). Hodnotová orientace a mezilidské vztahy v pedagogických sborech. Ostrava: OU.

40. Svobodová, L. (2008). Nenechte se šikanovat kolegou. Mobbing - skrytá hrozba. Praha: Grada.

41. Thomas, A. R. (1976). The organizational climate of schools. International Review of Education, 22(4), 441-463. CrossRef

42. Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2005). A developmental approach to mentalizing communities II. The peaceful schools experiment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 69(4), 282-304. CrossRef

43. Urbánek, P. (2003a). K metodologickým otázkám měření klimatu učitelských sborů. In S. Ježek (Ed.), Psychosociální klima školy I (s. 123-134). Brno: MU.

44. Urbánek, P. (2003b). Měření klimatu školy a učitelského sboru v českém prostředí základní školy. (Příprava aplikace dotazníku OCDQ-RS.) In Sociální a kulturní souvislosti výchovy a vzdělávání. 11. výroční mezinárodní konference ČAPV. Brno: MU. [CD-ROM] Dostupné též z https://www.ped.muni.cz/capv11/default0.htm

45. Urbánek, P. (2006). Klima učitelských sborů ZŠ: Empirická zjištění. In M. Kocurová (Ed.), Současné metodologické přístupy a strategie pedagogického výzkumu. 14. konference ČAPV. Plzeň: ZČU. Dostupné z http://www.kpg.zcu.cz/capv/HTML/105/default.htm

46. Urbánek, P. (2008). Klima učitelského sboru v případové studii základní školy. Orbis scholae, 2(3), 87-106. CrossRef

47. Vartia, M. (1996). The sources of bullying: Psychological work environment and organizational climate. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(2), 203-214. CrossRef

48. Vartia, M. (2001). Consequences of workplace bullying with respect to the well-being of its targets and the observers of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27(1), 63-69. CrossRef

49. Vartia, M. (2003). Workplace bullying: A study on the work environment, well-being and health (Nepublikovaná disertační práce). Helsinky: UH. Dostupné z http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/hum/psyko/vk/vartia-vaananen/workplac.pdf

50. Vignoli, M., Guglielmi, D., Balducci, C., & Bonfiglioli, R. (2015). Workplace bullying as a risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders: The mediating role of job-related psychological strain. BioMed Research International, 2015(2), 712642. CrossRef

51. Walberg, H. J. (1972). Social environment and individual learning: A test of the Bloom model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1), 69-73. CrossRef

52. Zapf, D., Escartín, J., Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., & Vartia, M. (2011). Empirical findings on prevalence and risk groups of bullying in the workplace. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (s. 75-105). London: Taylor & Francis. CrossRef

Creative Commons License
Mobbing a jeho role ve vnímání klimatu školy učiteli is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

157 x 230 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177

Ke stažení