AUC Philologica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica) je akademický časopis publikující jak lingvistické, tak literárně historické a teoretické studie. Nedílnou součástí časopisu jsou i recenze odborných knih a zprávy z akademického prostředí.
Časopis je indexován v databázích CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO a ERIH PLUS.
AUC PHILOLOGICA, Vol 2016 No 3 (2016), 73–85
As comparações fixas em português – aspetos semânticos e a questão de variabilidade
[Portuguese similes – semantic aspects and the question of variability]
Anna Veverková
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2016.37
zveřejněno: 11. 11. 2016
Abstract
Similes are a very salient type of idiomatic expression, characterized by a number of specific features. Like all idiomatic expressions in general, similes are also a subject of debate, mostly regarding their idiomaticity and classification within the area of phraseology. This article will provide a concise overview of basic questions such as the essential definition of similes and their structure, which will serve as a basis for a further investigation of their semantic aspects, particularly the phenomena of metaphor and metonymy. These will in turn be defined theoretically, considering the recent research disseminated by various linguists. The role of these two figures of speech in similes will be investigated, based on examples from a large set of frequent similes gathered from the corpus. Subsequently, the phenomenon of variation within the area of fixed phrases will be observed.
klíčová slova: similes; metaphor; metonymy; variation; semantics
reference (19)
1. Bojílova Tchobánova, I. (2006): As comparações fixas na língua portuguesa: essência, estrutura, função, relações semânticas, classificação. Textos Seleccionados do XXII Encontro Nacional da APL., pp. 649–661.
2. Britto, V. da Silva (2008): O prisma clássico e moderno de metáfora. Cadernos do XII Congresso Nacional de Linguística e Filologia, vol. 6, pp. 118–132.
3. Chiappe, D. L. – Kennedy, J. M. (1999): Aptness predicts preference for metaphors or similes, as well as recall bias. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 6, num. 4, pp. 668–676. CrossRef
4. Chiappe, D. L. – Kennedy, J. M. (2000): Are Metaphors Elliptical Similes? Journal of Psycholonguistic Research, vol. 29, pp. 371–398. CrossRef
5. Čermák, F. (2007): Frazeologie a idiomatika česká a obecná = Czech and general phraseology. 1. ed. Praha: Karolinum.
6. Davies, M. – Ferreira, M. (2006–): Corpus do Português: 45 million words, 1300s–1900s. [online] Disponível em: http://www.corpusdoportugues.org.
7. Dicionário Priberam da Língua Portuguesa [online] Disponível em: http://www.priberam.pt/dlpo.
8. Farias, E. M. P. (2007): Metáfora e metonímia na geração de sentido. Organon. Porto Alegre, vol. 43, pp. 85–95.
9. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (1992): Categorization and Metaphor Understanding. Psychological Review, vol. 99, núm. 3, pp. 572–577. CrossRef
10. Lakoff, G. – Johnson, M. (1980): Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
11. Moon, R. (1998): Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: a Corpus-Based Approach. 1st publ. Oxford: Clarendon Press, XI.
12. Olano Otaola, C. (2004): Los cambios de significado o cambios semánticos. Lexicología y semántica léxica: Teoría y aplicación a la Lengua Espa-ola. Madrid: Ediciones Académicas, pp. 359–387.
13. Paiva, V. Menezes Oliveira (2011): O Processamento metonímico/metafórico à luz da teoria do caos/complexidade. Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades: Estudos Linguísticos, vol. 15, núm. 1, pp. 51–66.
14. Philip, G. (2011): Colouring meaning: collocation and connotation in figurative language [online]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Co., Studies in corpus linguistics; vol. 43 [cit. 2015-06-16]. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/natl/Doc?id=10448699.
15. Rio-Torto, G. – Ribeiro, S. (2010): Unidades pluriverbais – ensino e processamento. Língua portuguesa: ultrapassar fronteiras, juntar culturas, vol. 32, pp. 227–248.
16. Sánchez, M. – García-Page (2008): Introducción a la fraseología espa-ola: estudio de las locuciones. 1. ed. Rubí, Barcelona: Anthropos.
17. Titone, D. A. – Connine, C. M. (1999): On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 31, pp. 1655–1674. CrossRef
18. Veale, T. – Hao, Y. (2009): Support structures for linguistic creativity: A computational analysis of creative irony in similes. Proceedings of CogSci 2009, the 31st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1376–1381.
19. Vilela, M. (2001): A metáfora ou a força categorizadora da língua: releitura de Lições de Filologia Portuguesa de Carolina Michaelis. Revista da Faculdade de Letras: Línguas e Literaturas, série II, vol. 18, pp. 171–180.
230 x 157 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 0567-8269
E-ISSN: 2464-6830
