Vybrané zahraniční programy hodnocení učitelů s využitím profesních standardů

Mezinárodně srovnávací studie si klade otázku, jak mohou profesní standardy pomáhat při hodnocení práce učitelů. Nejdříve naznačíme aktuální teoretické přístupy k hodnocení práce učitelů a uvedeme zdroje, ze kterých vycházejí. Potom se soustředíme na roli profesních standardů v hodnocení kvality učitele, postupy jejich tvorby a aktuální stav jejich využívání v některých anglosaských zemích. Podrobněji popíšeme procesy hodnocení organizace National Board for Professional Teaching Standards z USA a aktuální vývoj zavádění hodnocení na bázi profesních standardů v Austrálii. An international comparative study is trying to find out the answer for the question how professional standards help in the teacher assessment. First of all we draw theoretical approaches to teaching and their resources. Afterwards we concentrate on the role of professional teaching standards in the teachers’ assessment, procedures of their development and current state of art in some English speaking countries. We continue with a detailed description of evaluation procedures in US organization National Board for Professional Teaching Standards and the actual professional standards development in Australia.

1. Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., Shepard, L. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, D. C.: Economic Policy Institute. Dostupné z http://www.epi.org/publications/entry/bp278.

2. Berliner, D. C. (2005). The near impossibility of testing for teacher quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(3), 205−213. CrossRef

3. Berliner, D. C. (1987). Simple views of effective teaching and a simple theory of classroom instruction. In D. C. Berliner, & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (s. 93−110). New York: Random House.

4. Cantrell, S., Fullerton, J., Kane, T., & Staiger, D. (2008). National Board certification a teacher effectiveness: Evidence from a random assignment experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. CrossRef

5. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107(1), 186−213. CrossRef

6. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. Dostupné z http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeachEffectiveness.pdf.

7. Haertel, E. (1986). The valid use of student performance measures for teacher evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 8, 45−60. CrossRef

8. Hamilton, L. S. (2012). Measuring teaching quality using student achievement tests: Lessons from educators' responses to No Child Left Behind. In S. Kelly (Ed.), Assessing teacher quality (s. 49−76). New York: Teachers College Press. PubMed

9. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267−271. CrossRef

10. Hattie, J., & Clinton, J. (2008). Identifying accomplished teachers: A validation study. In L. C. Ingvarson, & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National board for professional teaching standards. Advances in program evaluation (s. 313−344). Bingley: Emerald. CrossRef

11. Ingvarson, L. C., & Kleinhenz, E. (2006). Standards for advanced teaching. A review of national and international developments. Canberra: Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

12. Ingvarson, L. C., & Rowe, K. (2008). Conceptualizing and measuring teacher quality: Substantive and methodological issues. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 5−34. CrossRef

13. Ingvarson, L. C., & Hattie, J. (Eds.) (2008). Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National board for professional teaching standards. Advances in program evaluation (s. 313−344). Bingley: Emerald.

14. Ingvarson, L. C. (2010). Recognising accomplished teachers in Australia: Where have we been? Where are we heading? Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 46−71. CrossRef

15. Kelly, S. (Ed.). (2012). Assessing teacher quality. New York: Teachers College Press.

16. Kennedy, M. (Ed.) (2010). Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

17. Křivohlavý, J. (2012). Hořet, ale nevyhořet. Kostelní Vydří: Karmelitánské nakladatelství.

18. Marzano, R. J., & Toth, M. D. (2013). Teacher evaluation that makes a difference. A new model for teacher growth and student acheivement. Alexandria: ASCD.

19. McCormac, G. (2011). Advancing professionalism in teaching. The report of the Review of Teacher Employment in Scotland. Scotland: APS Group.

20. NBPTS (1991). Toward high and rigorous standards: What teachers should know a be able to do. Dostupné z http://www.nbpts.org.

21. Pearlman, M. (2008). The design architecture of NBPTS certification assessments. In L. C. Ingvarson & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National board for professional teaching standards. Advances in program evaluation (s. 55−92). Bingley: Emerald. CrossRef

22. Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.

23. Píšová, M., Najvar, P., Janík, T., Hanušová, S., Kostková, K., Janíková, Zerzová, J. (2011). Teorie a výzkum expertnosti v učitelské profesi. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.

24. Reese, J. P. (2010). The National Board for Professional Teching Standards: An investment for the future? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teacher assessment and the quest for teacher quality: A handbook (s. 283−296). San Francisco: Jossey−Bass.

25. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 19(2), 4−14. CrossRef

26. Schochet, P. Z., & Chiang, H. S. (2010). Error rates in measuring teacher and school performance based on student test score gains. Washington: U.S. Department of Education. Dostupné z http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20104004/. PubMed

27. Smith, T. W., Baker, W. K., Hattie, J., & Bond, L. (2008). A validity study of the certification system of the NBPTS. In L. C. Ingvarson, & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National board for professional teaching standards. Advances in program evaluation (s. 313−344). Bingley: Emerald.

28. Spilková, V., & Tomková, A., et al. (2010). Kvalita učitele a profesní standard. Praha: PedF UK.

29. Starý, K. (2013, v tisku). Učitelské profesní standardy v anglicky mluvících zemích a jejich místo v systému profesního rozvoje učitelů. In D. Greger (Ed.), Srovnávací pedagogika: Proměny a výzvy. Praha: PedF UK.

30. Vašutová, J. (2004). Profese učitele v českém vzdělávacím kontextu. Brno: Paido.

31. Wolf, K., Davis. A., & Borko, H. (2008). Providing feedback to teacher candidates for NBPTS: A study of teacher preferences and learning. In L. C. Ingvarson & J. Hattie (Eds.), Assessing teachers for professional certification: The first decade of the National board for professional teaching standards. Advances in Program Evaluation (s. 313−344). Bingley: Emerald. CrossRef