Oznamujeme autorům a čtenářům, že po dohodě s nakladatelstvím Karolinum bude od roku 2024 (ročník 18) časopis Orbis scholae vycházet pouze v elektronické podobě.
Orbis scholae je odborný recenzovaný časopis zaměřený na problematiku školního vzdělávání v jeho širších sociokulturních souvislostech. Cílem časopisu je přispět k porozumění školnímu vzdělávání a jeho rozvoji, k řešení problémů praxe a vzdělávací politiky.
Časopis je zařazen do databází SCOPUS, CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO a ERIH Plus.
ORBIS SCHOLAE, Vol 16 No 2 (2022), 75–103
Searching for Consistency in Attendance Data Recording, Reporting, and Utilization in the USA
Patricia A. Graczyk, Carolyn Gentle-Genitty, Amber Humm Patnode, Sara E. Moulton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2023.6
zveřejněno: 02. 05. 2023
Abstract
According to the United States Department of Education (USDOE), 16% or over eight million kindergarten through twelfth grade students in the US missed 10% or more school days during the 2017−2018 school year. This is approximately 18 of 180 days required. We know this because schools are mandated to report their attendance data to their respective states and to the USDOE. There are concerns around accuracy and consistency because each state is allowed to compile data in their own way and report only select metrics to the USDOE to comply with federal guidelines. The consistency on federal metrics, nonetheless, allows for similar analyses at the federal and state levels and comparisons across states. To best understand what is reported, we report on data compiled by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) housed in the Institute of Education Sciences, the science branch of the USDOE, and describe how attendance data are collected, reported, and used at the national level. We share similar findings for two representative US states − Connecticut and Indiana − to highlight similarities and differences between them, and their “best practices.” Key results from these multiple levels of analyses are then discussed, with the goal of informing research, practice, and policy related to school attendance, so that students of all ages and from all backgrounds are provided the opportunity to obtain optimal benefits from schooling throughout their school careers.
klíčová slova: school attendance; chronic absenteeism; truancy; multi-level analyses; case study; National Center for Education Statistics; education policy
reference (54)
1. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. U.S. Department of Education. An Act Concerning Chronic Absenteeism, State of Connecticut Public Act 15−225 (2015). https://www.cga.ct.gov/2015/act/pa/2015PA-00225-R00SB-01058-PA.htm
2. An Act Concerning the Recommendations of the Juvenile Justice Policy and Oversight Committee, State of Connecticut Public Act 16−147 (2017). https://www.cga.ct.gov/2016/act/pa/2016PA-00147-R00HB-05642-PA.htm
3. An Act Concerning Social Equity and the Health, Safety and Education of Children, State of Connecticut Public Act 21-46, Section 19 (a) and (b) (2021). https://portal.ct.gov/−/media/SDE/Digest/2021-22/MemoMHWdaysFall-2021.pdf
4. Attendance Works. (2016). Teaching families why attendance matters. https://doe.sd.gov 101/title/documents/AttendanceMatters.pdf
5. Attendance Works. (2016, September). Chronic absence: Our top pick for the ESSA School Quality or Student Success indicator [policy brief]. https://www.attendanceworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ESSA-Brief_083016-revised.pdf
6. Attendance Works & Everyone Graduates Center. (2021, February). Using chronic absence to map interrupted schooling, instructional loss, and educational inequity: Insights from School Year 2017−2018 data. https://www.attendanceworks.org/wp-content /uploads/2019/06/Attendance-Works-Using-Chronic-Absence-to-Map_020221.pdf
7. Carminucci, J., Hodgman, S., Rickles, J., & Garet, M. (2021, June). AIR national survey of public education's response to COVID-19 research brief: Student attendance and enrollment loss in 2020−21. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/research-brief-covid-survey-student-attendance-june-2021_0.pdf
8. Chang, H., Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2022, September). Pandemic causes alarming increase in chronic absence and reveals need for better data. https://www.attendanceworks.org/pandemic-causes-alarming-increase-in-chronic-absence-and-reveals-need-for-better-data/
9. Connecticut Data Collaborative. (n.d.). Chronic absenteeism by race ethnicity. Year 2019−2020. http://data.ctdata.org/visualization/chronic-absenteeism-by-race-ethnicity
10. Connecticut General Statues, Chapter 168, School Attendance and Employment of Children (n.d.). https://www.cga.ct.gov/current/pub/chap_168.htm#sec_10-198_a_and_c
11. Connecticut Report Cards. (n. d). https://edsight.ct.gov/SASStoredProcess/guest?_program=%2FCTDOE%2FEdSight%2FRelease%2FReporting%2FPublic%2FReports%2FStoredProcesses%2FReportCardLandingPage
12. Connecticut State Department of Education. (2008). Guidelines for reporting student attendance in the public school information system (PSIS). https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Performance/Data-Collection/Help-Sites/PSIS/attendance/GuidelinesForReportingStudentAttendanceInPSIS_PDF.pdf?la=en
13. Connecticut State Department of Education. (2013). Guidelines for implementation of the definitions of excused and unexcused absences and best practices for absence prevention and intervention. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Chronic-Absence/guidelines_excused_and_unexcused_absences.pdf
14. Connecticut State Department of Education. (2017). Reducing chronic absence in Connecticut's schools: A prevention and intervention guide for schools and districts. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Chronic-Absence/Prevention_and_Intervention_Guide.pdf?la=enConnecticut State Department of Education. (2021). Tracking attendance on remote days in 2020−2021. https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/SDE/Digest/2020-21/Tracking-Attendance-On-Remote-Days-For-State-Reporting.pdf
15. Connecticut State Department of Education. (2022). Monthly attendance report. https://edsight.ct.gov/relatedreports/Supporting%20Student%20Participation%20in%202020-21.html
16. Department of Education Organization Act of 1979, Public Law No. 96-88, 93 Stat. 668 (1979). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-93/pdf/STATUTE-93-Pg668.pdf
17. Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Public Law 89−10 (1965). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79-Pg27.pdf
18. Every Student Succeeds Act, Public Law 114-95 (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ95/PLAW-114publ95.pdf
19. Gentle-Genitty, C., Karikari, I., Chen, H., Wilka, E., & Kim, J. (2015). Truancy: A look at definitions in the USA and other territories. Educational Studies, 41(1−2), 62−90. CrossRef
20. Gentle-Genitty, C., & Taylor, J. (May, 2021). Responsibility for socialization − Truancy: More than absences. Pivot Attendance Solutions.
21. Gross, B., & Opalka, A. (2020). Too many schools leave learning to chance during the pandemic. CRPE. https://www.crpe.org/thelens/too-many-schools-leave-learningchance-during-pandemic
22. Hamilton Project. (2021). Chronic absence across the United States 2017−2018. https://www.hamiltonproject.org/charts/chronic_absence_across_the_united_states_2017_18_school_year
23. Heyne, D., Gren-Landell, M., Melvin, G., & Gentle-Genitty, C. (2019). Differentiation between school attendance problems: Why and how? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 26(1), 8−34. CrossRef
24. Indiana Department of Education. (n.d.-a). Model attendees. https://inview.doe.in.gov/state/1088000000/attendance
25. Indiana Department of Education. (n.d.-b). Student population [Data source: 2020−2021 school year]. https://inview.doe.in.gov/state/1088000000/population
26. Irwin, V., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Hein, S., Wang, K., Roberts, A., York, C., Barmer, A., Bullock Mann, F., Dilig, R., & Parker, S. (2021). Report on the condition of education 2021 [NCES 2021−144]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021144
27. Jordan, P. W., & Miller, R. (2017). Who's in: Chronic absenteeism under the Every Student Succeeds Act. Future Ed. https://www.future-ed.org/whos-in-chronic-absenteeism-under-the-every-student-succeeds-act/
28. Katz, M. S. (1976). A history of compulsory education laws [Fastback Series, No. 75 - Bicentennial Series]. Phi Delta Kappa.
29. Kearney, C. A. (2022). Functional impairment guidelines for school attendance problems in youth: Recommendations for caseness in the modern era. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 53(3), 295−303. CrossRef
30. Kearney, C. A., & Graczyk, P. (2014). A response to intervention model to promote school attendance and decrease school absenteeism. Child & Youth Care Forum, 43(1), 1−25. CrossRef
31. Kearney, C. A., & Graczyk, P. A. (2020). A multi-dimensional, multi-tiered system of supports model to promote school attendance and address chronic absenteeism. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 23, 316−337. CrossRef
32. Lochmiller, C. R. (2013, October). Improving student attendance in Indiana's schools: Synthesis of existing research related to student absenteeism and effective, research-based interventions. Indiana University, Center for Education and Evaluation Policy.
33. Melvin, G., Heyne, D., Gray, K. M., Hastings, R. P., Totsika, V., Tonge, B. J., & Freeman, M. M.
34. (2019). The Kids and Teens at School (KiTeS) framework: An inclusive bioecological systems approach to understand school absenteeism and school attendance problems. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 61.
35. National Association of School Psychologists. (2022). Position statement: Grade retention and social promotion. https://www.nasponline.org/x59976.xml
36. National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). State Education Practices − Table 1.1. Minimum number of instructional days and hours in the school year, minimum number of hours per school day, and school start/finish dates, by state: 2020. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/statereform/tab1_1−2020.asp
37. National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). Digest of Educational Statistics. Table 203.90. Average daily attendance (ADA) as a percentage of total enrollment, school day length, and school year length in public schools, by school level and state: 2007−08 and 2011−12. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_203.90.asp
38. National Center for Education Statistics. (2019, December). Homeschooling in the United States: Results from the 2012 and 2016 Parent and Family Involvement Survey (PFINHES: 2012 and 2016). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020001.pdf
39. National Center for Education Statistics. (2020a). Digest of education statistics: 2020 tables and figures. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_201.10.asp?current=yes
40. National Center for Education Statistics. (2020b). Digest of education statistics: 2020 tables and figures. Table 206.10 Number and percentage of homeschooled students ages 5 through 17 with a grade equivalent of kindergarten through 12th grade, by selected child, parent, and household characteristics: Selected years, 1999 through 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d20/tables/dt20_206.10.asp
41. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2009). Every school day counts: The forum guide to collecting and using attendance data [NFES 2009−804]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
42. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2018). Forum guide to collecting and using attendance data [NFES 2017-007]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
43. National Forum on Education Statistics. (2021). Forum guide to attendance, participation, and engagement data in virtual and hybrid learning models [NFES-2021-058]. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
44. Nickerson, A. B., & Sulkowski, M. L. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a long-term school crisis: Impact, risk, resilience, and crisis management. School Psychology, 36(5), 271−276. CrossRef
45. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 − P. L. 107−110 (2002). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/PLAW-107publ110/pdf/PLAW-107publ110.pdf
46. Regional Educational Laboratory West. (n.d.). Helpful links about multi-tiered attendance interventions. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/west/relwestFiles/pdf/REL-West-Every-Student-Every-Day-Helpful-Links-508.pdf
47. Stevenson, H. &, Lee, S. (1996). The educational system in the United States: Case study findings. https://www2.ed.gov/PDFDocs/UScasestudy.pdf
48. UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO figures show two thirds of an academic year lost on average worldwide due to Covid-19 school closures. https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-figures-show-two-thirds-academic-year-lost-average-worldwide-due-covid-19-school
49. UNESCO-IBE. (2007). United States of America. In World Data on Education (6th ed.). http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/document/world-data-education-sixth-edition-2006-07
50. U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). Population estimates July 1 2021. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221
51. U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). Ed Data Express. https://eddataexpress.ed.gov/
52. U.S. Department of Education. (2019). Chronic absenteeism in the nation's schools: A hidden educational crisis. https://www2.ed.gov/datastory/chronicabsenteeism.html
53. U.S. News & World Report. (2021). Education rankings: Measuring how well states are educating their students. https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/education
54. Van Dinther, M., Dochy, F., & Segers, M. (2011). Factors affecting students' self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 95−108. CrossRef
Searching for Consistency in Attendance Data Recording, Reporting, and Utilization in the USA is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
157 x 230 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177