ORBIS SCHOLAE

ORBIS SCHOLAE

Orbis scholae je odborný recenzovaný časopis zaměřený na problematiku školního vzdělávání v jeho širších sociokulturních souvislostech. Cílem časopisu je přispět k porozumění školnímu vzdělávání a jeho rozvoji, k řešení problémů praxe a vzdělávací politiky.

ORBIS SCHOLAE, Vol 14 No 3 (2020), 9–31

Vývoj globálneho diskurzu vzdelávacej politiky a nové sociálne funkcie predškolského vzdelávania

[Development of Global Discourse of Educational Policy and New Social Functions of Early Childhood Education]

Ondrej Kaščák

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2021.1
zveřejněno: 20. 01. 2021

Abstract

The study analyses the nature of global education governance and the mechanisms of transnational influencing of national education systems today, with an emphasis on early childhood education. Through a discursive analysis of key OECD and EU documents, it clarifies the new conceptualization of the early childhood education and early childhood education sector as such. The conceptualization, based on a prospective and economizing view, is promoted through various reform mechanisms within particular national contexts. The study gives examples of reform movements in Slovakia and Germany. The study confirms the validity of the so-called convergence hypothesis for early childhood education, despite the diversity of early childhood education traditions in Europe.

Klíčová slova: early childhood education; discourse; OECD; EU; social investment paradigm; Slovakia; Germany; convergence hypothesis

reference (65)

1. Auld, E., & Morris, P. (2019). The OECD and IELS: Redefining early childhood education for the 21st century. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 11-26. CrossRef

2. Campbell-Barr, V., & Bogatić, K. (2017). Global to local perspectives of early childhood education and care. Early Child Development and Care, 187(10), 1461-1470. CrossRef

3. Campbell-Barr, V., & Nygård, M. (2014). Losing sight of the child? Human capital theory and its role for early childhood education and care policies in Finland and England since the mid-1990s. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 15(4), 346-359. CrossRef

4. Casalini, B. (2014). The early childhood education and care policy debate in the EU. Interdisciplinary Journal of Family Studies, 19(1), 77-94.

5. Clausen, S. B. (2015). Schoolification or early years democracy? A cross-curricular perspective from Denmark and England. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 16(4), 355-373. CrossRef

6. Commission of the European Communities. (2003). Education & training 2010. The success of the Lisbon strategy hinges on urgent reforms. COM (2003) 685. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

7. Council of the European Union. (1992). 92/241/EEC: Council recommendation of 31 March 1992 on child care. Brussels: Council of the European Union.

8. Daly, M. (2019). Children and their rights and entitlements in EU welfare states. Journal of Social Policy, 49(2), 343-360. CrossRef

9. Dos Santos Sousa, D., Grey, S., & Oxley, L. (2019). Comparative international testing of early childhood education: The democratic deficit and the case of Portugal. Policy Futures in Education, 17(1), 41-58. CrossRef

10. European Commission. (2014). Proposal for key principles of a quality framework for early childhood education and care. Brussels: European Union.

11. European Commission. (2018). Monitoring the quality of early childhood education and care - Complementing the 2014 ECEC quality framework proposal with indicators. Brussels: European Commission.

12. European Council. (2000). Presidency conclusions. Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm#.

13. Európska komisia. (2010). EURÓPA 2020: Stratégia na zabezpečenie inteligentného, udržateľného a inkluzívneho rastu. KOM(2010) 2020. Brusel: Európska komisia.

14. Európska komisia. (2011). Vzdelávanie a starostlivosť v ranom detstve: zabezpečenie optimálneho začiatku pre všetky naše deti vo svete budúcnosti. KOM(2011) 66. Brusel: Európska komisia.

15. Európska komisia. (2013). Investovať do detí: východisko z bludného kruhu znevýhodnenia (2013/112/EÚ). Brusel: Európska komisia.

16. Európska komisia. (2018a). Odporúčanie Rady týkajúce sa vysokokvalitných systémov vzdelávania a starostlivosti v ranom detstve. COM(2018) 271. Brusel: Európska komisia.

17. Európska komisia. (2018b). Správa komisie Európskemu parlamentu, Rade, Európskemu hospodárskemu a sociálnemu výboru a výboru regiónov o rozvoji zariadení starostlivosti o malé deti na účely zvýšenia účasti žien na trhu práce, zabezpečenia rovnováhy medzi pracovným a súkromným životom pracujúcich rodičov a zaistenia udržateľného a inkluzívneho rastu v Európe (Barcelonské ciele). COM(2018) 273. Brusel: Európska komisia.

18. Fangmeyer, A., & Kaščák, O. (2016). Transgressionen: Zum diskursiven Rekonfigurieren von institutionalisierten (frühen) Kindheiten. Ein slowakisch­deutscher Vergleich von curricularen Dokumenten. In I. Nentwig-Gesemann, I., K. Fröhlich-Gildhoff, T. Betz & S. Viernickel (Eds.), Forschung in der Frühpädagogik 9 (s. 141-172). Freiburg: FEL.

19. Frindte, A., & Mierendorff, J. (2017). Bildung, Erziehung [education] and care in German early childhood settings - spotlights on current discourses. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(1), 99-120. CrossRef

20. Gisbert, K. (2004). Neue Bildungsinhalte. In I. Wehrmann, I. (Ed.), Kindergärten und ihre Zukunft (s. 138-148). Weinheim: Beltz.

21. Hemerijck, A. C. (2016). Rethinking E(M)U governance from the perspective of social investment. In P. Iglesias-Rodriguez, A. Triandafyllidou, & R. Gropas (Eds.), The Financial Crisis and Paradigm Shift: Legal, Economic, and Political Perspectives (s. 173-211). London: Palgrave / MacMillan.

22. Humes, W. (2000). The discourses of educational management. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(1), 35-53.

23. Childcare network. (1996). Quality targets in services for young children. Proposals for a ten year programme. https://www.childcarecanada.org/sites/default/files/Qualitypaperthree.pdf.

24. Jones, P. (2010). The politics of the economics of education in the European Union. European Educational Research Journal, 9(3), 359-380. CrossRef

25. Kašparová, I., & Klvaňová, R. (2016). Dítě a dětství: proměnlivá konceptualizace pojmů a její vazby na vzdělávání. Sociológia, 48(4), 377-398.

26. Klimovský, D. (2010). Genéza koncepcie good governance a jej kritické prehodnotenie v teoretickej perspektíve. Ekonomický časopis, 58(2), 188-205.

27. Komisia európskych spoločenstiev. (2006). Efektívnosť a rovnosť v európskych systémoch vzdelávania a odbornej prípravy. KOM(2006) 481. Brusel: Európska komisia.

28. Krstovic, J., & Drakulic, M. (2019). Did Cinderella arrive at the ball? Implications of contemporary European education policies on the prospects of early childhood education and care. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education, 6(3), 40-49. CrossRef

29. Lemke, T. (2001). ,Die Ungleichheit ist für alle gleich' - Michel Foucaults Analyse der neoliberalen Gouvernementalität. Miszelle, 16(2), 99-115.

30. Mahon, R. (2009). The OECD's discourse on the reconciliation of work and family life. Global Social Policy, 9(2), 183-204. CrossRef

31. Mahon, R. (2016). Early childhood education and care in global discourses. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (s. 224-240). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. CrossRef

32. Malatinská, S. (2014). Kritická historická analýza vplyvu pruského vzdelávacieho systému na americký vzdelávací systém. Pedagogika.sk, 5(2), 122-136.

33. Mierendorff, J. (2014). Annäherungen von Kindergarten und Schule. Wandel früher Kindheit? In P. Cloos, K. Hauenschild, I. Pieper, & M. Baader (Eds.), Elementar- und Primarpädagogik. Internationale Diskurse im Spannungsfeld von Institutionen und Ausbildungskonzepten (s. 23-37). Wiesbaden: Springer. CrossRef

34. Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Beyond the welfare state as we know it? In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges (s. 1-30). Bristol: Policy Press. CrossRef

35. Moss, P. (2009). There are alternatives! Markets and democratic experimentalism in early childhood education and care. Working papers No. 53. The Hague: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

36. Moss, P. (2017). Power and resistance in early childhood education: From dominant discourse to democratic experimentalism. Journal of Pedagogy, 8(1), 11-32. CrossRef

37. Moss, P., Dahlberg, G., Grieshaber, S., Mantovani, S., May, H., Pence, A., Rayna, S., Swadener, B. B., & Vandenbroeck, M. (2016). The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's International Early Learning Study: Opening for debate and contestation. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 17(3), 343-351. CrossRef

38. OECD. (1960). Convention on the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/general/conventionontheorganisationforeconomicco-operationanddevelopment.htm.

39. OECD. (2001). Starting strong: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD. CrossRef

40. OECD. (2006). Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD. CrossRef

41. OECD. (2012). Starting strong III: A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

42. OECD. (2015). Starting strong IV: Monitoring quality in early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD.

43. OECD. (2017). Starting strong V: Transitions from early childhood education and care to primary education. Paris: OECD.

44. OECD. (2018a). Early learning matters. Paris: OECD.

45. OECD. (2018b). Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

46. Ochs, K., & Phillips, D. (2004). Processes of educational borrowing in historical context. In D. Phillips & K. Ochs (Eds.), Educational policy borrowing: Historical perspectives (s. 7-23). Oxford: Symposium Books. CrossRef

47. Olk, T. (2010). Investing in children? Changes in policies concerning children and families in European countries. In M. Ajzenstadt & J. Gal (Eds.), Children, gender and families in mediterranean welfare states. Children's well-being: Indicators and research, vol. 2 (s. 3-33). Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef

48. Paananen, M., Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2015). Hybridisation or ousterisation? The case of local accountability policy in Finnish early childhood education. European Educational Research Journal, 14(5), 395-417. CrossRef

49. Pal, L. A. (2012). Frontiers of governance: The OECD and global public management reform. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

50. Pence, A. (2016). Baby PISA: Dangers that can arise when foundations shift. Journal of Childhood Studies, 41(3), 54-58. CrossRef

51. Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2003). Processes of policy borrowing in education: Some analytical and explanatory devices. Comparative Education, 39(4), 451-461. CrossRef

52. Portnoi, L. M. (2016). Policy borrowing and reform in education: Globalized processes and local contexts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

53. Quinlivan, A., & Schön, E. (2002). Breaking down the barriers? New public management in the European Commission. Journal of Public Affairs, 2(2), 19-32. CrossRef

54. Rada Európskej únie. (2009). Závery Rady z 12. mája 2009 o strategickom rámci pre európsku spoluprácu vo vzdelávaní a odbornej príprave ("ET 2020") (2009/C 119/02). Brusel: Rada Európskej únie.

55. Rada Európskej únie. (2015). Závery Rady o úlohe vzdelávania v ranom detstve a primárneho vzdelávania pri podpore tvorivosti, inovačnosti a digitálnej kompetencie (2015/C 172/05). Brusel: Rada Európskej únie.

56. Schleicher, A. (2019). Helping our youngest to learn and grow: Policies for early learning. International summit on the teaching profession. Paris: OECD Publishing. CrossRef

57. Shuey, E. A., & Kankaraš, M. (2018). The power and promise of early learning. OECD education working paper No. 186. Paris: OECD.

58. Shuey, E. A., Kim, N., Cortazar, A., Poblete, X., Rivera, L., Lagos, M. J., Faverio, F., & Engel, A. (2019). Curriculum alignment and progression between early childhood education and care and primary school: A brief review and case studies. OECD education working paper No. 193. Paris: OECD.

59. Schreiber, N. (2009). Die Einführung der neuen Bildungspläne in Kindertageseinrichtungen - Ergebnisse von Begleitstudien in drei Bundesländern. Diskurs Kindheits- und Jugendforschung, 4(3), 431-437.

60. Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. (2004). Gemeinsamer Rahmen der Länder für die frühe Bildung in Kindertageseinrichtungen. Bonn/Berlin: KMK.

61. Taguma, M., Litjens, I., & Makowiecki, T. (2012). Quality matters in early childhood education and care: Slovak Republic 2012. Paris: OECD. CrossRef

62. Tolofari, S. (2005). New public management and education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 75-89. CrossRef

63. Turunen, T. A., & Rafferty, J. (2013). Insights beyond neo-liberal educational practices: the value of discourse analysis. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 12(1), 43-56. CrossRef

64. Urban, M. (2018). (D)evaluation of early childhood education and care? A critique of the OECD's International Early Learning Study. In M. Matthes, L. Pulkkinen, C. Clouder, & B. Heys (Eds.), Improving the Quality of Childhood in Europe, Volume 7 (s. 91-99). Brussels: Alliance for Childhood European Network Foundation.

65. Vero, J. (2012). From the Lisbon strategy to Europe 2020: The statistical landscape of the education and training objectives through the lens of the capability approach. Social Work and Society, 10(1), 1-16.

Creative Commons License
Vývoj globálneho diskurzu vzdelávacej politiky a nové sociálne funkcie predškolského vzdelávania is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177

Ke stažení