Jak vidím své žáky – hodnoticí úsudek učitelky o jednotlivých žácích v 6. třídě

The aim of this study is to describe formation and successive progression of teacher’s judgments about individual pupils. To reveal the teacher’s judgment repeated semi-structured interviews with a second grade teacher were used. The fact that the teacher’s judgment about pupils is changing in the course of time is the main result of this case study. The group of pupils judged as excellent gradually decreases during the school year, while the group of average pupils increases. Teacher’s judgments are based primarily on two factors: the way how pupils communicate and their school results. Natural abilities and efforts of the pupils are also considered by a teacher. Based on her judgment, the teacher’s differential behaviour towards individual pupils is formed.

1. Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23, 1−9. CrossRef

2. Babad, E. (2005). Guessing teachers' differential treatment of high- and low-achievers from thin slices of their public lecturing behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 29(2), 125−134. CrossRef

3. Bláha, K., & Šebek, M. (1988). Já − tvůj žák, Ty − můj učitel. Praha: SPN.

4. Bohlmann, N. L., & Weinstein, R. S. (2013). Classroom context, teacher expectations, and cognitive level: Predicting children's math ability judgments. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34, 288−298. CrossRef

5. Bressoux, P., & Pansu, P. (2015). Pupils' self-perceptions: The role of teachers' judgment controlling for big-fish-little-pond effect. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 341−357. CrossRef

6. Brophy, J. E. (1982). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. East Lansing: Michigan State University, Institute for Research on Teaching.

7. Canal, L., Bonini, N., Micciolo, R., & Tentori, K. (2012). Consistency in teachers' judgments. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 319−327. CrossRef

8. Cooper, H. M., et al. (1979). Understanding Pygmalion: The social psychology of self-fulfilling classroom expectations. Columbia: Missouri University.

9. Higgins, C. S. (2011). Teacher-student relationship development: A qualitative study of interpersonal connections in an early childhood classroom (Disertační práce). Columbus: College of Education and Human Ecology, The Ohio State University.

10. Chang, J. (2011). A case study of the "Pygmalion effect": Teacher expectations and student achievement. International Education Studies, 4(1), 198−201. CrossRef

11. Kaiser, J., Retelsdorf, J., Südkamp, A., & Möller, J. (2013). Achievement and engagement: How student characteristics influence teacher judgments. Learning and Instruction, 28, 73−84. CrossRef

12. Kierein, N., & Gold, M. (2000). Pygmalion in work organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 21(1), 913−928. CrossRef

13. Kolář, Z., & Šikulová, R. (2009). Hodnocení žáků. Praha: Grada.

14. McMillan, J., & Turner, A. (2014). Understanding student voices about assessment: Links to learning and motivation. Philadelphia: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

15. Newberry, M. (2010). Identified phases in the building and maintaining of positive teacher-student relationships. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1695−1703. CrossRef

16. Newberry, M. (2013). Reconsidering differential behaviors: Reflection and teacher judgment when forming classroom relationships. Teacher Development, 17(2), 195−213. CrossRef

17. Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers' perceptions of young children's cognitive abilities: The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 335−360. CrossRef

18. Rubie-Davies, Ch. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 289−306. CrossRef

19. Rubie-Davies, Ch. M., Hattie, J., & Hamilton, R. (2006). Expecting the best for students: Teacher expectations and academic outcomes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 429−444. CrossRef

20. Santini, J. (2014). Reflections on expectations. Odyssey, 15(1), 74−78.

21. Sedláček, M. (2007). Případová studie. In R. Švaříček & K. Šeďová, et al., Kvalitativní výzkum v pedagogických vědách (s. 96−112). Praha: Portál.

22. Sharp, A. C., Brandt, L., Tuft, E. A., & Jay, S. (2016). Relationship of self-efficacy and teacher knowledge for prospective elementary education teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2432−2439. CrossRef

23. Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Francis, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2009). Gender "matters" in the primary classroom: pupils' and teachers' perspectives. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 187−204. CrossRef

24. Stoicescu, S., & Ghinea, V. (2013). Pygmalion teaching style: Is there a need for it? Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 8(4), 699−722.

25. Šeďová, K., Sucháček, P., & Majcík, M. (2015). Kdopak to mluví? Participace žáků ve výukové komunikaci na druhém stupni základní školy. Pedagogika, 65(2), 143−162.

26. Šeďová, K., & Šalamounová, Z. (2015). Žákovská participace na komunikaci jako produkt interakcí mezi učitelem a žákem. Lifelong Learning, 5(3), 75−94.

27. Urhahne, D., Chao, S., Florineth, M. L., Luttenberger, S., & Paechter, M. (2011). Academic self-concept, learning motivation, and test anxiety of the underestimated student. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 161−177. CrossRef

28. Urhahne, D., & Zhu, M. (2015). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' subjective well-being. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 226−232. CrossRef

29. Walker, H. M., Marquez, B., Yeaton, P., Pennefather, J., Forness, S. R., & Vincent, C. G. (2015). Teacher judgment in assessing students' social behavior within a response-to-intervention framework: Using what teachers know. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(3), 363−382. CrossRef

30. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.