Timing the difference: A study of gemination in Dogri consonants

This study examines the phonetic and phonological properties of singleton–geminate contrasts in Dogri within the context where the preceding vowel is short, i.e. in CVCV: word structures. Linear Mixed-Effects (LMER) statistical results reveal that geminates are temporally nearly twice as long as their singleton counterparts (~ 70 ms), followed by consistent shortening of the preceding vowel (~ 16 ms). The remaining segments, i.e., the word-initial consonant and the word-final vowel, remain indiscriminable across both word types, suggesting no anticipatory lengthening in geminate contexts for the former, and minor shortening (but statistically non-significant) among geminates for the latter. Additional findings regarding voicing effects, phrase-level context, and overall word duration for both word types confirm cross-linguistic voicing trends: voiceless geminates are longer with added evidence of pre-consonantal vowel shortening relative to their voiced counterparts. Moreover, geminates show significantly longer durations in Fixed Phrase contexts than in Carrier Phrase. Lastly, the longer total word duration for geminates (~ 53 ms) suggests that gemination in Dogri extends beyond a local phonetic phenomenon, bearing a distinctive prosodic and phonological weight. These results posit the view that temporal elongation reflects their status as phonologically contrastive units, rather than being a by-product of durational redistribution of the segments.

1. Aldubai, N. A. (2015). The impact of geminates on the duration of the preceding and following vowels in Ta'zi dialect. Arab World English Journal. Vol. 6. CrossRef

2. Bates, D., Machler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. CrossRef

3. Bhatia, T. K. (1993). Punjabi: A cognitive descriptive grammar. Routledge.

4. Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

5. Blevins, J. (2005). The typology of geminate inventories: Historical explanations for recurrent sound patterns. In Seoul Linguistics Forum 2005 (pp. 121-137). Language Education Institute, Seoul National University.

6. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.3.16, Retrieved from http://www.praat.org [Computer program]

7. Cho, H. (2016). Variation in vowel duration depending on voicing in American, British, and New Zealand English. Korean Society of Speech Sciences, 8(3), 11-20. CrossRef

8. Dulai, N. K., & Koul, O. N. (1980). Punjabi Phonetic Reader. Central Institute of Indian Languages.

9. Engstrand, O., & Krull, D. (2009). Durational Correlates of Quantity in Swedish, Finnish and Estonian: Cross-Language Evidence for a Theory of Adaptive Dispersion. Phonetica, 51(1-3), 80-91. CrossRef

10. Ghai, V. K. (1991). Studies in Phonetics and Phonology with special reference to Dogri. Ariana Publishing House.

11. Ghosh, A. (2015). Acoustic correlates of voicing and gemination in Bangla. In D. M. Sharma, R. Sangal, & E. Sherly (eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON-2015) (pp. 413-418). NLP Association of India. https://aclanthology.org/W15-5957

12. Gleason, H. A., & Gill, H. S. (1969). A reference grammar of Punjabi (3rd ed.). Punjabi University.

13. Grierson, G. A. (1904). On the modern Indo-Aryan alphabets of North-Western India. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1 (67-73). CrossRef

14. Gupta, V., & Chowdhary, S. (2024). History of translation in Dogri literature: An overview. In NTM, CIIL, Mysore (pp. 8-21).

15. Hamzah, M. H., Fletcher, J., & Hajek, J. (2016). Closure duration as an acoustic correlate of the word-initial singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Kelantan Malay. Journal of Phonetics, 58, 135-151. CrossRef

16. Han, M. S. (1994). Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96(1), 73-82. CrossRef

17. Hirata, Y. (2007). Durational variability and invariance in Japanese stop quantity distinction: Roles of adjacent vowels (sokuon, or moraic obstruent). Onsei Kenkyu (Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan), 11(1), 9-22.

18. Hussain, Q. (2015). Temporal characteristics of Punjabi word-medial singletons and geminates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(4), EL388-EL392. CrossRef

19. Idemaru, K., & Guion-Anderson, S. (2010). Relational Timing in the Production and Perception of Japanese Singleton and Geminate Stops. Phonetica, 67(1-2), 25-46. CrossRef

20. Kaur, K., & Dwivedi, A. V. (2018). Dogri and its dialects: A comparative study of Kandi and Pahari Dogri (Linguistics Edition, 115). LINCOM.

21. Kluender, K. R., Diehl, R. L., & Wright, B. A. (1988). Vowel-length differences before voiced and voiceless consonants: An Auditory Explanation. Journal of Phonetics, 16(2), 153-169. CrossRef

22. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1-26. CrossRef

23. Lahiri, A., & Hankamer, J. (1988). The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 16(3), 327-338. CrossRef

24. Lenth, R. (2025). emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.11.1-00001, https://rvlenth.github.io/emmeans

25. Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996) The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

26. Maddieson, I., & Gandour, J. (1975). Vowel length before stops of contrasting series. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(S1), S61-S61. CrossRef

27. Mitterer, H., (2018) The singleton-geminate distinction can be rate dependent: Evidence from Maltese, Laboratory Phonology 9(1). CrossRef

28. Ohala, M. (2007). Experimental methods in the study of Hindi geminate consonants. In M.-J. Solé, P. Speeter Beddor, & M. Ohala (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology (pp. 351-368). Oxford University Press. CrossRef

29. Ridouane, R. (2007). Gemination in Tashlhiyt Berber: an acoustic and articulatory study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37(2), 119-142. CrossRef

30. Ridouane, R. (2010). Geminates at the junction of phonetics and phonology. In C. Fougeron, B. Kühnert, M. D'Imperio, & N. Vallée (eds.), Laboratory phonology 2010 (pp. 61-90). De Gruyter Mouton. CrossRef

31. Rojczyk, A., & Porzuczek, A. (2019). Durational properties of Polish geminate consonants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 146(6), 4171-4182. CrossRef

32. RStudio Team. (2023). RStudio: Integrated development environment for R (Version 2023.09.0). RStudio. https://www.rstudio.com

33. Samudravijaya, K. (2003). Durational characteristics of Hindi stop consonants. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (Eurospeech 2003) (pp. 81-84). CrossRef

34. Shrotriya, N., Siva Sarma, A. S., Verma, R., & Agrawal, S. S. (1995). Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of geminate Hindi stop consonants. In K. Elenius & P. Branderud (eds.), Proceedings of ICPhS95 (vol. 4, pp. 132-135). Arne Strömbergs Grafiska.

35. Shrotriya, N., Verma, R., Gupta, S. K., & Agrawal, S. S. (1996). Durational characteristics of Hindi consonant clusters. Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (vol. 4, pp. 2427-2430). CrossRef

36. Khattab, G., & Al-Tamimi, J. (2014). Geminate timing in Lebanese Arabic: the relationship between phonetic timing and phonological structure. Laboratory Phonology, 5(2), 231-269. CrossRef

37. Tabain, M., & Jukes, A. (2016). Makasar. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 46(1), 99-111. CrossRef

38. Turco, G., & Braun, B. (2016). An acoustic study on non-local anticipatory effects of Italian length contrast. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(4). CrossRef

39. Warikoo, K. (2000). Tribal Gujjars of Jammu & Kashmir. Himalayan and Central Asian Studies, 4(1).