AUC Philologica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica) je akademický časopis publikující jak lingvistické, tak literárně historické a teoretické studie. Nedílnou součástí časopisu jsou i recenze odborných knih a zprávy z akademického prostředí.
Časopis je indexován v databázích CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO a ERIH PLUS.
AUC PHILOLOGICA, Vol 2025 No 3 (2025), 85–95
ArticleProsodic prominence of modal verbs in narratives
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2025.22
zveřejněno: 26. 01. 2026
Abstract
The study deals with accentuation (presence or absence of realized lexical stress) of modal verbs in continuous spoken texts. The material was taken from audiobooks where Czech professional actors (8 male + 8 female) read out various narratives produced by renowned authors. A corpus of over 17,000 words was used. The recordings were annotated with special attention to presence or absence of materialized stress (i.e., accent). The chief purpose of the study was to provide descriptive data on modal verbs in connected speech, namely in the genre of narrative monologue. The results showed that modal verbs were deaccented in more than a quarter of their occurrences, but that monosyllabic and polysyllabic verbs behaved differently from each other. The infinitives associated with modal were also inspected. They were much less often unaccented and, importantly, the influence of monosyllabicity followed a different pattern than in modals. Additionally, information on mutual position of modals and associated infinitives is provided and an observation of negative forms of modals is made. The data can be further used in follow-up research to find out how structural and communicative requirements interact to produce the actual prosodic forms, or how modals in narratives differ from those in other communicative genres.
klíčová slova: accenting; associated infinitive; modal verbs; modality; negative form; prominence; prosodic backgrounding
reference (23)
1. Auwera, van der, J., & Plungian, V. A. (1998). Modality's semantic map. Linguistic Typology, 2(1), 79-124. CrossRef
2. Benešová, E. (1973). K sémantické klasifikaci českých modálních sloves. In Otázky slovanské syntaxe III, Brno: Universita J. E. Purkyně, 217-219.
3. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer (Version 6.2). [Computer Program]. Available online: www.praat.org (accessed in April 2022).
4. Daneš, F. (1979). O identifikaci známé (kontextově zapojené) informace v textu. Slovo a slovesnost, 40(4), 257-270.
5. Féry, C. (2017). Intonation and Prosodic Structure. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
6. Franz, I., Knoop, Ch., Kentner, G., Rothbart, S., Kegel, V., Vasilieva, J., Methner, S., Scharinger, M., & Menninghaus, W. (2022). Prosodic Phrasing and Syllable Prominence in Spoken Prose. A Validated Coding Manual. OSF Preprints. CrossRef
7. Geigerich, H. J. (1992). English Phonology: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
8. Grepl, M., & Karlík, P. (1986). Skladba spisovné češtiny [Syntax of Standard Czech] (1st ed.). Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
9. Hengeveld, K. (2004). Illocution, mood and modality. In G. Booij, C. Lehmann, J. Mugdan, & S. Skopeteas (eds.), Morphology: An International Handbook on Inflection and Word-Formation, Vol. 2. de Gruyter.
10. Hoye, L. F. (2005). "You may think that; I couldn't possibly comment!" Modality studies: Contemporary research and future directions. Part I. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1295-1321. CrossRef
11. Hualde, J. I. (2010). Secondary stress and stress clash in Spanish. In M. Ortega-Llebaria (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 11-19.
12. Karlík, P., & Šimík, R. (2017). Modální sloveso. In Petr Karlík, Marek Nekula, & Jana Pleskalová (eds.), CzechEncy - Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. URL: https://www.czechency.org/slovnik/MODÁLNÍ SLOVESO (retrieved: 02-02-2025).
13. Klinge, A. (1993). The English modal auxiliaries: from lexical semantics to utterance interpretation. Journal of Linguistics, 29(2), 315-357. CrossRef
14. Lunden, A. (2019). Explaining word-final stress lapse. In R. Goedemans, J. Heinz, & H. van der Hulst (eds.), The Study of Word Stress and Accent: Theories, Methods and Data, 76-101. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
15. Nauze, F. (2008). Modality in Typological Perspective. Doctoral thesis DS-2008-08, University of Amsterdam.
16. Palková, Z. (1994). Fonetika a fonologie češtiny [Phonetics and phonology of Czech] (1st ed.). Univerzita Karlova, Nakladatelství Karolinum.
17. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality, Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics (2nd ed.), Cambridge University Press.
18. Rosa, de la V. M., & Romero, E. D. (2021). Epistemic and non-epistemic modals: The key to interpreting the spirit of counter-terrorism United Nations Security Council resolutions. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 89-101. CrossRef
19. Svoboda, K. (1967). Dvě úvahy ke spisu K. Welkeho o "modálních" slovesech v němčině (O komunikačním efektu a o modálních slovesech). Slovo a slovesnost, 28(4), 426-431.
20. Volín, J., & Hanžlová, A. (2024). Deaccented verb as an element in the utterance information structure. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2024, 911-915. Leiden: ISCA. CrossRef
21. Volín, J., Šturm, P., Skarnitzl, R., & Bořil, T. (2024). Prosodic Phrase in Spoken Czech. Karolinum. CrossRef
22. Volín, J., & Skarnitzl, R. (2020). Accent-groups vs. stress-groups in Czech clear and conversational speech. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2020. Tokyo: ISCA, 695-699. CrossRef
23. Volín, J., & Skarnitzl, R. (2018). Segmentální plán češtiny [Segmental plan of the Czech Language]. FF UK.

Prosodic prominence of modal verbs in narratives is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 0567-8269
E-ISSN: 2464-6830
