Variation in speech tempo and its relationship to prosodic boundary occurrence in two speech genres

The present study focuses on two problems connected with speech tempo. First, earlier research has been prevalently concerned with central tendencies while variation was mostly perceived as an auxiliary result. We believe, however, that information about data dispersion is essential for proper modelling and experiment design in the field of temporal structure of speech. Therefore, the present study provides reference values for some of the tempo metrics of variation that pertain to (a) between-genre differences, (b) within-genre differences, (c) inter-speaker differences, and (d) intra-speaker differences. Second, we tested the claim that faster tempi lead to fewer prosodic breaks in spoken texts. This claim had been supported by studies where a respondent was asked to produce the same text at various rates. We, on the other hand, pose a question of the number of prosodic breaks in speakers who are fast or slow inherently. The material used in the study represents two genres: poetry reciting and news reading, and we obtained recordings from 24 speakers in each genre. Apart from providing the quantifications, the outcomes suggest, for example, that the predisposition of individual speakers to produce fast or slow tempi differs between the two genres. The fastest speakers in news reading were not necessarily the fastest in poetry reciting. This result points at specific behaviour in different situations and invites caution concerning the idea of hard-wired speaking stereotypes in individuals. Also, the correlation between speakers’ rates and the number of phrases they produced was significant only in news reading, not in poetry reciting. This result was corroborated by greater variation in prosodic boundary placement in news reading. In addition, the results offer an insight into the relationship between articulation rate and speech rate, together with the comparison of measurements in syllables per second and phones per second. The latter can be of interest since Czech (the language of the material) belongs to languages with a complex syllabic structure.

1. Barik, H. C. (1977). Cross-linguistic study of temporal characteristics of different types of speech materials. Language and Speech, 20, 116-126. CrossRef

2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Computer programme downloaded at http://www.praat.org/.

3. Campbell, W.N. (1992). Syllable-based segmental duration. In: G. Bailly, C. Benoit, T. Sawallis (Eds.) Talking Machines. Theories, Models, and Designs. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. 211-224.

4. Carlson, R., & Granström, B. (1986). A search for durational rules in a real-speech database, Phonetica 43, 140-154. CrossRef

5. Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., Boves, L. (1997). Automatic evaluation of Dutch pronunciation by using speech recognition technology. In: S. Furui, B.H. Juang, W. Chou, (Eds.), Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Santa Barbara, pp. 622-629. CrossRef

6. Dankovičová, J. (2001). The Linguistic Basis of Articulation Rate Variation in Czech. (Forum Phoneticum 71). Frankfurt am Main: Hector.

7. Fougeron, C. & Jun, S.-A. (1998). Rate effects on French intonation: prosodic organization and phonetic realization. Journal of Phonetics 26, 45-69. CrossRef

8. Fourakis M. (1986). An acoustic study of the effects of tempo and stress on segmental intervals in Modern Greek. Phonetica, 43(4), 172-188. CrossRef

9. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1961), The significance of changes in the rate of articulation. Language and Speech, 4, 171-174 CrossRef

10. Graham, C., & Nolan, F. (2019). Articulation rate as a metric in spoken language assessment. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH, Graz: ISCA pp. 3564-3568. CrossRef

11. Grosjean, F. (1980). Comparative studies of temporal variables in spoken and sign languages: A short review. In: W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.) Temporal variables in speech, pp. 307-312. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossRef

12. Jessen, M. (2007). Forensic reference data on articulation rate in German. Science & Justice, 47, 50-67. CrossRef

13. Johnson, C. C., Hollien, H. & Hicks, J. W. (1984). Speaker identification utilizing selected temporal speech features. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 319-326. CrossRef

14. Künzel, H. J. (1997). Some general phonetic and forensic aspects of speaking tempo. Forensic Linguistics, 4, 48-83. CrossRef

15. Koreman, J. (2006). Perceived speech rate: The effects of articulation rate and speaking style in spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 582-596. CrossRef

16. Lennon, P. A. (1990). Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach. Language Learning, 40, 387-417. CrossRef

17. O'Shaughnessy, D. (1984). A multispeaker analysis of durations in read French paragraphs. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1664-1672. CrossRef

18. Palková, Z. (1994). Fonetika a fonologie češtiny. Praha: Karolinum.

19. Pfitzinger, H.R. (1998). Local speech rate as a combination of syllable and phone rate. In: Proceedings of ICSLP '98 - Sydney, vol. 3, pp. 1087-1090. CrossRef

20. Pollák, P., Volín, J. & Skarnitzl, R. (2007). HMM-based phonetic segmentation in Praat environment. In: Proceedings of XIIth Speech and Computer - SPECOM 2007, pp. 537-541.

21. Port, R.F. (1979). The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 45-56. CrossRef

22. Skalská, H. (1992). Úvod do biostatistiky. Hradec Králové: LF UK.

23. Trouvain, J. & Grice, M. (1999). The effect of tempo on prosodic structure. Proc. of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. San Francisco: IPA, pp. 1067-1070.

24. Trouvain, J. & Möbius, B. (2014). Sources of variation of articulation rate in native and non-native speech: comparisons of French and German. Proceedings of 7th Speech Prosody, Dublin, pp. 275-279. CrossRef

25. Volín, J. (2009). Metric warping in Czech newsreading. In: R. Vích (Ed.) Speech Processing - 19th Czech-German Workshop, pp. 52-55. Praha: AVČR.

26. Wagner, P. Trouvain, J. & Zimmerer, F. (2015). In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research. Journal of Phonetics 48, 1-12. CrossRef

27. Werner, R. Trouvain, J., & Möbius, B. (2022). Optionality and variability of speech pauses in read speech across languages and rates. In: S. Frota, M. Cruz, & M. Vigário (Eds.) Proceedings of 11th Speech Prosody, Lisbon, pp. 312-316. CrossRef