Aux frontières de l’humanité : (in)efficacité de l’empathie et de l’expérience esthétique

The humanities in general, and literature in particular – Martha Nussbaum argues – deserve a leading role within the educational system, because they contribute in a fundamental way to the functioning of a democratic society. More concretely, they would help to cultivate empathetic citizens, concerned with the experiences, suffering and vulnerability of people whose lives seem radically different from their own. In the present article, the correlation between literary education, empathy, and justice established by Martha Nussbaum will be tested by reference to an extreme case, i.e. the affective relations between human beings and artificial creatures as represented in Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus by Mary Shelley, and Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. The limits and dangers of empathy, on the one hand, and the ambivalent character of aesthetic experience, on the other, will be emphasized. In these two novels – the author argues – the arbitrary distinction between human and non-human, as well as the differential justice that follows the lines of this cleavage, is consolidated precisely by the deep sympathy/empathy/compassion felt for members of the same group of belonging, be it social class, gender, race, or species. Furthermore, if aesthetic education functions for the protagonists of the two novels both as an illusory compensation and a means of subjectivation, the effect that the narratives may have on the readers is far from clear and unequivocal: even though empathy for otherness is partially able to undermine our closure of identity, it remains powerless as a motivation for acting ethically, if this implies the loss of benefits for our group of belonging (ethnic, national or human).

1. Adams, C. J. « Frankenstein's Vegetarian Monster ». In Ead. (1994) : The Sexual Politics of Meat : a Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory. New York : Continuum, pp. 108–119.

2. Bachtin, M. (2010) : Estetica e romanzo. Torino : Einaudi.

3. Bloom, P. (2006) : Against Empathy : the Case for Rational Compassion. New York : Ecco.

4. Booth, W. (1969) : The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago-London : University of Chicago Press.

5. Currie, M. « Controlling Time : Never Let Me Go ». In Matthews, S. – Groes, S. (2009) : Kazuo Ishiguro. Contemporary Critical Perspectives. New York : Continuum, pp. 91–103.

6. Davis, T. F. – Womach, K. (2001) : Mapping the Ethical Turn : A Reader in Ethics, Culture, and Literary Theory. The University Press of Virginia

7. Goldie, P. (2000) : The Emotions : A Philosophical Explorations. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

8. Hakemulder, J. (2000), « The Moral Laboratory : Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-Concept », Utrecht Publications in General and Comparative Literature, 34.

9. Herman, D. – Jahn, M. – Ryan M.-L. (2005) : Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. London-New York.

10. Hoeveler, D. « Frankenstein, Feminism, and Literary Theory ». In Schor, E. (2004) : The Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–62.

11. Ishiguro, K. (2017) : Never Let Me Go. London : Faber and Faber.

12. Keen, S. (2007) : Empathy and the Novel. Oxford : Oxford University Press, CrossRef

13. Lowe-Evans, M. « Reading with a "Nicer Eye" : Responding to Frankenstein ». In Smith, J. (1992) : Frankenstein. Boston : Bedford books of St. Martinʼs Press, pp. 215- 229.

14. McLane, M. N. (1996) : « Literate Species : Populations, "Humanities", and Frankenstein », ELH, 63, 4, pp. 959–988. CrossRef

15. Mellon, A. K. « Making a "Monster" : An Introduction to Frankenstein ». In Schor, E. (2003) : Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

16. Miall, D. S. (1988) : « Affect and Narrative : A Model of Responses to Stories », Poetics 17, pp. 259–72. CrossRef

17. Miall, D. S. (2000) : « On the Necessity of Empirical Studies of Literary Reading », Frame, 14, 2–3, pp. 43–59.

18. Miller, I. W. (1997) : The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge-London : Harvard University Press.

19. Mosser, A. W. von (2014) : Cosmopolitan Minds : Literature, Emotion, and the Transnational Imagination. Austin : University of Texas Press.

20. Mullan, J. « On First Reading Never Let Me Go ». In Matthews, S. – Groes, S. (2009) : Kazuo Ishiguro. Contemporary Critical Perspectives. New York : Continuum.

21. Ngai, S. (2005) : Ugly Feelings. Cambridge-London : Harvard University Press.

22. Nussbaum, M. (1995) : Poetic Justice : the Literary Imagination and Public Life. Boston : Beacon Press.

23. Nussbaum, M. (1997) : Cultivating Humanity : a Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge-London : Harvard University Press.

24. Nussbaum, M. (2010) : Not for Profit : Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton-Oxford : Princeton University Press.

25. Pedwell, C. (2014) : Affective Relations : The Transnational Politics of Empathy. London-New York : Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

26. Saïd, E. (1993) : Culture and Imperialism. New York : Knopf.

27. Schor, E. (2003) : Cambridge Companion to Mary Shelley. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

28. Shelley, M. (1994) : Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus. London : Penguin Books.

29. Smith, J. M. « 'Cooped Up' : Feminine Domesticity in Frankenstein ». In Smith, J. (1992) : Frankenstein. Boston : Bedford books of St. Martinʼs press, pp. 270–85.

30. Sontag, S. (2003) : Regarding the Pain of Others. New-York : Picador.

31. Spivak, G. C. (2004) : « Righting Wrongs », The South Atlantic Quarterly, 113, 2–3, pp. 523–581.

32. Spivak, G. C. (1985) : « Three Women's Texts and a Critique of Imperialism », Critical Inquiry, XII, 1, pp. 243–261. CrossRef

33. Sullivan, Z. T. (1989) : « Race, Gender, and Imperial Ideology in the Nineteenth Century », Nineteenth-Century Contexts, XIII, 1, pp. 19–32. CrossRef

34. Tortonese, P. « La creatura. Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, 1818 ». In Moretti, F. (2003) : Il romanzo. IV Temi, luoghi, eroi. Torino : Einaudi, pp. 753–761.

35. Vernay, J.-F. (2013) : Plaidoyer pour un renouveau de l'émotion en littérature. Paris : Complicités. Mossner

36. Whitehead, A. (2011) : « Writing with Care : Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go », Contemporary Literature, 52, 1, pp. 54–83. CrossRef

37. Wimsatt, W. K. – Beardsley, M. (1949) : « The Affective Fallacy », Sewanee Review, 57, 1, pp. 31–55.

38. Wimsatt, W. K. – Beardsley, M. (1954) : The Verbal Icon : Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington : University of Kentucky Press.