The effect of voice quality on hiring decisions

This paper examines the effect of voice quality on hiring decisions. Considering voice quality an important tool in an individual’s self-presentation in the job market, it may very well enhance his/her job prospects, while some voice qualities may affect employers’ judgments in a negative way. Five men and five women were recorded reading four different utterances representing answers to job interviewers’ questions in four different phonation guises: modal, breathy, creaky and pressed. 38 professional employment interviewers recorded the speakers’ hireability and personality ratings (likeability, self-confidence and trustworthiness) on 7-point semantic differential scales based on the speakers’ voice. The results revealed a significant effect of the phonation guises on the speakers’ ratings with the modal voice being superior to the cluster of non-modal voices. Interestingly, the non-modal guises were evaluated in a very similar way, except for the self-confidence category with the breathy voice getting the lowest scores on the one hand and the pressed voice correlating with high self-confidence ratings on the other.

1. Abdelli-Beruh, N. B., Wolk, L. & Slavin, D. (2014). Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers. Journal of Voice, 28, 185–190. CrossRef

2. Anderson, R. C., Klofstad, C. A., Mayew, W. J. & Venkatachalam, M. (2014). Vocal fry may undermine the success of young women in the labor market. PloS One, 9, e97506. CrossRef

3. Andrews, M. L. & Schmidt, C. P. (1997). Gender presentation: Perceptual and acoustical analyses of voice. Journal of Voice, 11/3, 307–313. CrossRef

4. Babel, M., McGuire, G. & King, J. (2014). Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness. PloS One, 9(2), e88616. CrossRef

5. Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.4.08). Downloaded: May 5 2015, http://www.praat.org.

6. Borkowska, B. & Pawlowski, B. (2011). Female voice frequency in the context of dominance and attractiveness perception. Animal Behaviour, 82, 55–59. CrossRef

7. Childers, D. G. & Lee, C. K. (1991). Vocal quality factors: Analysis, synthesis, and perception. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 90(5), 2394–2409. CrossRef

8. DeVito, J. A. (2016): The Interpersonal Communication Book. Harlow: Pearson.

9. Fox, J. (2003). Effect displays in R for generalised linear models. Journal of Statistical Software, 8(15), 1–27. CrossRef

10. Fraccaro, P. J., O'Connor, J. J. M., Re., D. E., Jones, B. J., DeBruine, L. M. & Feinberg, D. R. (2013). Faking it: deliberately altered voice pitch and vocal attractiveness. Animal Behaviour, 85, 127–136. CrossRef

11. Greer, S. D. F. & Winters, S. J. (2015). The perception of coolness: Differences in evaluating voice quality in male and female speakers. In: Proceedings of the 18th ICPhS, Paper 0883.

12. Gobl, C. & Ní Chasaide, A. (2003). The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication, 40, 189–212. CrossRef

13. Henton, C. G. & Bladon, R. A. W. (1985). Breathiness in normal female speech: Inefficiency versus desirability. Language & Communication, 5, 221–227. CrossRef

14. Henton, C. G. & Bladon, R. A. W. (1988). Creak as a sociophonetic marker. In: Hyman, L. M. a Li, C. N. (Eds.), Language, Speech and Mind: Studies in Honour of Victoria A. Fromkin, 3–29. London: Routledge.

15. Keating, P., Garellek, M. & Kreiman, J. (2015). Acoustic properties of different kinds of creaky voice. In: Proceedings of the 18th ICPhS, Paper 821.

16. Kreiman, J., Vanlancker-Sidtis, D. & Gerratt, B. L. (2003). Defining and measuring voice quality. In: Proceedings of VOQUAL'03 ISCA, Tutorial and Research Workshop, 115–120.

17. Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. New York: CUP.

18. Liu, X. & Xu, Y. (2011). What makes a female voice attractive? In: Proceedings of 17th ICPhS, 1274–1277.

19. Mendoza, E. et al. (1996). Differences in voice quality between men and women: Use of the Long-Term Average Spectrum (LTAS). Journal of Voice, 10/1, 59–65. CrossRef

20. Moisik, S. R. (2012). Harsh voice quality and its association with blackness in popular American media. Phonetica, 69, 193–215. CrossRef

21. Puts, D. A., Hodges-Simeon, C., Cárdenas, R. A. & Gaulin, S. J. C. (2007). Men's voices as dominance signals: vocal fundamental and formant frequencies influence dominance attributions among men. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 28, 340–344. CrossRef

22. R Core Team (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.

23. Skarnitzl, R. (2016). Co dokáže náš hlas? Fonetický pohled na variabilitu řečové produkce. Slovo a smysl, 26, 95–113.

24. Skills You Need (2016). Effective Speaking. Retrieved on December 22, 2016 from http://www.skillsyouneed.com/ips/effective-speaking.html.

25. Titze, I. R. (1989). Physiological and acoustic differences between male and female voices. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 85(4), 1699–1707. CrossRef

26. Traunmüller, H. & Eriksson, A. (2000). Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 3438–3451. CrossRef

27. Tykalová, T., Rusz, J., Čmejla, R., Růžičková, H. & Růžička, E. (2014). Acoustic investigation of stress patterns in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Voice, 28(1), 129.e1–129.e8. CrossRef

28. Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (use R!). New York: Springer. CrossRef