Ředitelská vize a vztahy v učitelském sboru: srdcaři, manažeři a přežívači

Principal’s vision along with the style of school leadership are important factors influencing school culture and thus also relationships among the teaching staff. The aim of the present paper is to present a part of the results from a series of 12 case studies of elementary schools focusing on principals’ visions, the resulting leadership styles and their reflection in ways of fostering relationships among the staff. Each case study consisted of a combination of data collection methods: questionnaire survey among teachers, interview with school management, interviews with selected teachers, analysis of school documents, and observation of school life, while the main source of data for the current contribution were 58 interviews with directors, deputy directors and teachers from 12 case schools. Relationships among teaching staff have emerged as a key value in principal’s vision. Consequently, school management uses various practices to promote professional and/or personal relationships among teachers. Based on the case studies, we identified three basic types of principals’ visions, which differ in the roles that leadership assigns to relationships among teachers. The types of visions were labeled “hearters,” “managers,” and “survivors.” The length of the time in management function and the specificity of the school compared to the others shoved both as significant factors influencing principal’s vision.

1. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational dynamics, 18(3), 19-31. CrossRef

2. Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational administration quarterly, 37(5), 662-683. CrossRef

3. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. USA, Sage Publications.

4. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. CrossRef

5. Bush, T. (2013). Distributed leadership: The model of choice in the 21th century. Educational Managment Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 543-544. CrossRef

6. Dvořák, D. (2011). Pedagogické vedení školy: hledání zdrojů a obsahu pojmu. Orbis scholae 5(3), 9-25. CrossRef

7. Early, P., Weindling, D. (2004) Understanding School Leadership. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

8. Fidler, B. (1997). School leadership: some key ideas. School Leadership and Management, 17(1), 23-37. CrossRef

9. Greenwood, R. (1996). Leadership theory: A historical look at its evolution. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 3-1. CrossRef

10. Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission and goals in school leadership and improvement. In Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9-40). Springer, Dordrecht. CrossRef

11. Hoyle, E. (2001). Teaching: Prestige, status and esteem. Educational Management & Administration, 29(2), 139-152. CrossRef

12. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534. CrossRef

13. Johnson, S., Cooper, C., Cartwright, S., Donald, I., Taylor, P., Millet, C. (2005). The experience of work-related stress across occupations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 178-187. CrossRef

14. Kurland, H., Peretz, H., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (2010). Leadership style and organizational learning: The mediate effect of school vision. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(1), 7-30. CrossRef

15. Lazarová, B. (2005). Osobnost učitele a rezistence vůči změně. Studia paedagogica, 53(10), 109-122.

16. Leithwood, K. A., Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.

17. Lukášová, R., Nový, I. (2004). Organizační kultura: od sdílených hodnot a cílů k vyšší výkonnosti podniku. Praha: Grada.

18. Mertkan, S. (2014). In search of leadership: what happened to managment? Educational Managment Administration & Leadership, 42 (2), 226-242. CrossRef

19. Plichtová, J. (1996). Obsahová analýza a jej možnosti využitia v psychológii.

20. Československá psychologie, 40(4), 304-314.

21. Ptáček, R., Raboch, J., Kebza, J. (2013). Burnout syndrom jako mezioborový jev. Praha: Grada.

22. Smetáčková, I., Viktorová, I. (2018). Teacher burnout syndrome, coping strategies and self-efficacy. Efficiency and Responsibility in Education ERIE, 336-343.

23. Southworth, G. (2004). Primary School Leadership in Context: Leading Small, Medium and Large Sized Primary Schools. London: Routledge & Falmer. CrossRef

24. Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1999). Základy kvalitativního výzkumu: Postupy a techniky metody zakotvené teorie. Boskovice, Czechia: Albert.

25. Trompenaars, F., Hampden-Turner, Ch. (1997). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural diversity in Business. [2nd] ed. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.