Proměny postojů učitelů ke kurikulární reformě a jejímu zavádění

The aim of this study was to describe the changes of primary and lower secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards curriculum reform and its implementation. In order to capture the attitudes changes retrospectively in the selected time span of ten years we looked at the attitudes from these positions: teachers’ expectations of curriculum reform before its implementation, critical moments which teachers experienced during the implementation and teachers’ attitudes towards the reform today. Qualitative investigation included semi-structured interview with 18 teachers teaching at primary and lower secondary schools. Data was analysed by means of thematic, axial, and selective coding. The research showed individual differences in attitude trajectories including the three positions. Respondents were divided into three basic groups according to their prevailing current attitude: positive − “supporting”, neutral − “balancing”, and negative − “disenchanted”. The “supporting” teachers were characterised by prevailing positive perceptions of the reform, agreement with the reform ideas and negative feelings fading out. The “balancing” teachers had ambivalent attitudes and were aware of both positive and negative aspects of the reform. The group of “disenchanted” teachers was primarily negatively oriented because of various failures and shortcomings which the reform brought from their point of view.

1. Albarracin, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. Advances in experimental social psychology, 34, 61–130. CrossRef

2. Angelides, P. (2001). The development of an efficient technique for collecting and analyzing qualitative data: The analysis of critical incidents. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(3), 429–442. CrossRef

3. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. CrossRef

4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 173–222). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

5. Brendl, C. M., Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology 28 (s. 95–160). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

6. Brückmann, M., Duit, R., Tesch, M., Fischer, H., Kauertz, A., Reyer, T., … Labudde, P. (2007). The potential of video studies in research on teaching and learning science. In R. Pinto & D. Couso (Eds.), Contributions from science education research (s. 77–89). Berlin: Springer.

7. Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374. CrossRef

8. Dahrendorf, R. (2005). Reflections on the revolution in Europe. New Brunswick and London: Transaction publishers.

9. Day, C. (1999). Developing teacher: The challenges of lifelong learning. London: Falmer Press.

10. Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677–692. CrossRef

11. Dvořák, D., Starý, K., & Urbánek, P. (2015). Malá škola po pěti letech: proměny školy v době reformy. Pedagogická orientace, 25(1), 9–31. CrossRef

12. Eagly, A. E., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 743–768). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

13. Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna, The handbook of attitudes (s. 79–124). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

14. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (s. 247–282). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

15. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Attitudes: Foundations, functions, and consequences. In M. A. Hogg, & J. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (s. 139–160). London: Sage.

16. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

17. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison–Wesley.

18. Flores, A. M. (2005). Teachers' view on recent curriculum changes: tension and challenges. The Curriculum Journal, 16(3), 401–413. CrossRef

19. Gläser-Zikuda, M. (2008). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse in der Lernstrategie- und Lernemotionsforschung. In P. Mayring & M. Gläser-Zikuda (Eds.), Die Praxis der Qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse (s. 63–83). Weinheim: Beltz.

20. Goodson, I. F. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(1), 45–63. CrossRef

21. Goodson, I. F., & Anstead, C. J. (2012). The life of a school. New York: Peter Lang.

22. Graham, M., Milanowski, A., & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. Center for educator compensation reform. Dostupné z http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532068.pdf

23. Hardman, J., & A-Rahman, N. (2014). Teachers and the implementation of a new English curriculum in Malaysia. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260–277. CrossRef

24. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.

25. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 575–630. CrossRef

26. Janík, T. (2013). Od reformy kurikula k produktivní kultuře vyučování a učení. Pedagogická orientace, 23(5), 634–663. CrossRef

27. Janík, T., Janko, T., Pešková, K., Knecht, P., & Spurná, M. (2018). Czech teachers' attitudes towards curriculum reform implementation. Human Affairs, 28(1), 54–70. CrossRef

28. Janík, T., Knecht, P., Najvar, P., Pavlas, T., Slavík, J., & Solnička, D. (2010). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích v rozhovorech s koordinátory pilotních a partnerských škol. Praha: VÚP.

29. Janík, T., Knecht, P., Najvar, P., Píšová, M., & Slavík, J. (2011). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích: výzkumná zjištění a doporučení. Pedagogická orientace, 21(4), 375–415.

30. Jorgensen, R., Walsh, L., & Niesche, R. (2009). Reforming schools: A case study of New Basics in a primary school. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(2), 115–133. CrossRef

31. Karakhanyan, S., van Veen, K., & Bergen, Th. C. M. (2011). Teachers' voices in the context of higher education reforms in Armenia. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 508–523. CrossRef

32. Krosnick, J. A., & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R.E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Antecedents and consequences (s. 1–24). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

33. Kruglanski, A. W., & Stroebe, W. (2005). The influence of beliefs and goals on attitude: Issues of structure, function, and dynamics. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 323–368). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

34. Lazarová, B. (2005). Osobnost učitele a rezistence vůči změně. Studia paedagogica, 53(10), 109–122.

35. Lee, J. Ch. (2000). Teacher receptivity to curriculum change in the implementation stage: The case of environmental education in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(1), 95–115. CrossRef

36. Marková, I. (Ed.). (2004). Trust and democratic transition in post-communist Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

37. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. CrossRef

38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.

39. Moree, D. (2013). Učitelé na vlnách transformace: Kultura školy před rokem 1989 a po něm. Praha: Karolinum.

40. Moscovici, S., (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (s. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

41. Olson, J. M., & Stone, J., (2005). The influence of behavior on Attitudes. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (s. 223–272). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

42. Pešková, K., Spurná, M., & Knecht, P. (2017). Teoretický model pro výzkum vnímání kurikulárních změn učiteli ZŠ. Orbis scholae, 11(2), 99–124. CrossRef

43. Pešková, K., Spurná, M., & Knecht, P. (zasláno redakci). Teachers' acceptance of curriculum reform in the Czech Republic: 10 years after. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal.

44. Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (2009). Shaping school culture: Pitfalls, paradoxes, & promises. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

45. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubugue: Brown.

46. Píšová, M., Kostková, K., Janík, T., Doulík, P., Hajdušková, L., Knecht, P., …, Vlček, P. (2011). Kurikulární reforma na gymnáziích. Případové studie tvorby kurikula. Praha: VÚP.

47. Plichtová, J. (1998). Sociálne reprezentácie: Teória, výskum, výzva. Československá psychologie, 6(42), 503–250.

48. Porubský, Š., Kosová, B., Doušková, A., Trnka, M., Poliach, V., Sabo, R., … Simanová, L. (2016). Kurikulum základnej školy očami učiteľov (empirické zistenia). Banská Bystrica: Belianum.

49. Rekkor, S., Ümarik, M., & Loogma, K. (2013). Adoption of national curricula by vocational teachers in Estonia. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 65(4), 489–506. CrossRef

50. Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers' sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949–965. CrossRef

51. Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B., & Olshavsky, R. W. (1996). A reexamination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing, 60(3), 15–32. CrossRef

52. Spurná, M., & Knecht, P. (2018). Využívání kurikulárních dokumentů učiteli základních škol: aplikace Johnsonovy typologie. Studia paedagogica, 23(1), 29–54. CrossRef

53. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, 9(4), 1–11.

54. Straková, J. (2010). Postoje českých učitelů k hlavním prioritám vzdělávací politiky. In R. K. Váňová, Učitel v současné škole (s. 167–175). Praha: FF UK.

55. Thompson, M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about attitudinal ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (s. 361–386). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

56. Tripp, D. (1994). Teachars' lives, critical incidents, and professional practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 7(1), 65–76. CrossRef

57. Tůmová, A. (2012). Effects of age and length of professional experience on teachers' attitudes to curricular reform. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 6(2), 84–99.

58. Vähäsantanen, K., & Eteläpelto, A. (2011). Vocational teachers' pathways in the course of a curriculum reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(3), 291–312. CrossRef

59. van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2006) How does it feel? Teachers' emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 85–111. CrossRef

60. van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2009). Teachers' emotions in a context of reforms: To a deeper understanding of teachers and reform. In P. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers' lives (s. 233–252). New York: Springer. CrossRef

61. Výrost, J. (2008). Postoje, jejich utváření a změna. In J. Výrost & I. Slaměník (Eds.), Sociální psychologie (s. 127–146). Praha: Grada Publishing.

62. Watkins, M. W., & Pacheco, M. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(4), 205–212. CrossRef

63. Waugh, R. F., & Punch, K. F. (1987). Teacher receptivity to systemwide change in the implementation stage. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 237–254. CrossRef