Orbis scholae je odborný recenzovaný časopis zaměřený na problematiku školního vzdělávání v jeho širších sociokulturních souvislostech. Cílem časopisu je přispět k porozumění školnímu vzdělávání a jeho rozvoji, k řešení problémů praxe a vzdělávací politiky.


Communication as a Means of Development in a School with a High Percentage of Foreign Pupils

Denisa Denglerová, Martina Kurowski, Radim Šíp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2020.4
zveřejněno: 14. 02. 2020


The text presented is a case study of one specific school in the Czech Republic, where many pupils with migrant backgrounds are concentrated. On the theoretical level, the study is based on experiential epistemology, which emphasizes interactions over the states and essences of actors or environments. This approach enables researchers to put the Bronfenbrenner’s model of the ecological system in a broader context of Chicago School (interactions) and Palo Alto School (communication). Bronfenbrenner’s concept of the mesosystem (in our case of the school) draw attention to the importance of communication and to specify three significant themes. The themes detect conditions that support and deepen the self/development of all actors involved (pupils, teachers, management, parents, etc.). In the methodological part, the themes have used as the frame for the frame analysis. In this way, the data collected in the school by observations, field notes, interviews are analysed. Although there are not many such schools like the one the authors research, they play an essential role in the integration of migrants into Czech society. That is the reason why the authors can discuss the outcomes of the study in a broader context and offer specific recommendations for state policies on the migrants’ inclusion.

Klíčová slova: experientialist epistemology; Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model; mesosystem; communication; education; inclusion policy; migrants

reference (35)

1. Appa, V. A. (2005). Study on how asylum seekers and refugees access education in four local authorities in England. London: National Children's Bureau.

2. Barša, P. (2011). Orientálcova vzpoura [The Oriental rebellion]. Prague: Dokořán.

3. Bennett, M. J. (2009). Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: a conceptual introduction to the Intercultural Education double supplement. Intercultural Education, 20(1), 1−13. CrossRef

4. Bennett, M. (2013). Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Paradigms, principles, & practices. Boston: Intercultural Press.

5. Berry, J. W. (2006). Contexts of acculturation. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 27−42). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press.

7. Cassity, E., & Gow, G. (2005). Making up for lost time: The experiences of Southern Sudanese young refugees in high schools. Youth Studies Australia, 24(3), 51−55.

8. Český statistický úřad. (2019). Data − počty cizinců. Available from: https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/4−ciz_pocet_cizincu#cr

9. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College Hill.

10. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossRef

11. Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. New York: Pantheon Books.

12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.

13. Dewey, J. (1939). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.

14. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publicating.

15. Dewey, J., & Bentley, Arthur F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.

16. Dockett, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2012). Family transitions as children start school. Family Matters, 90, 57−67.

17. Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1997). Life cycle completed. Extended version with new chapters on ninth stage of development. New York: W. W. Norton.

18. EURYDICE. (2004). Integrating Immigrant Children into Schools in Europe. Brussel: Euridyce.

19. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers' professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397−406. CrossRef

20. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., & Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond smarter − mediated learning and the brain's capacity for change. New York: Teachers College Press.

21. Hamilton, R. J., & Moore, D. (2004). Educational interventions for refugee children: Theoretical perspectives and implementing best practice. London: Routledge Falmer. CrossRef

22. Hayes, N., O'Toole, L., & Halpenny, A. M. (2017). A Guide for practitioners and students in early years education. London: Routledge.

23. Hek, R. (2005). The role of education in the settlement of young refugees in the UK: The experience of young refugees. Practice, 17(3), 157−171. CrossRef

24. Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

25. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

26. MacCullum, D. (2009). Newcomer orientation week in Ontario high schools. INSCAN (International Settlement Canada), 23(2), 3−4.

27. Montgomery J. R. (1996). Components of refugee adaptation. International Migration Review, 30(3), 679−702. CrossRef

28. Noiriel, G. (2012). Úvod do historické sociologie [Introduction to historical sociology]. Prague: Slon.

29. Sidhu, R., & Taylor S. (2007). Educational provision for refugee youth in Australia: Left to chance? Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 283−300. CrossRef

30. Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG, 4(2), 72−79.

31. Super, Ch. M., & Harkness, S. (2002). Culture structures the environment for development. Human Development, 45(4), 270−274. CrossRef

32. Švec, V., Nehyba, J., Svojanovský, P. et al. (2017). Becoming a teacher: The dance between tacit and explicit knowledge. Brno: MUNIPress. CrossRef

33. UNESCO (2016). If you don't understand, how can you learn? Policy Paper, 24(1), 1−9.

34. Watzlawick, P. B., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1962). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.

35. Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141−155). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Creative Commons License
Communication as a Means of Development in a School with a High Percentage of Foreign Pupils is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
vychází: 3 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 150 Kč
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177

Ke stažení