HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE
HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE

Interdisciplinární časopis se zaměřuje především ze sociologického, politologického a historického hlediska na problematiku dlouhodobých sociálních procesů a trendů, modernizace, globalizačních tendencí a vlivů. Časopis vytváří širší platformu pro badatele v historických sociálních vědách. Epistemologické pole časopisu není striktně ohraničené a počítá s přesahy do civilizacionistiky, kulturní sociologie a dalších spřízněných oblastí.

Časopis vydává nakladatelství Univerzity Karlovy v Praze Karolinum ve spolupráci s Fakultou humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy v Praze.

Historická sociologie je vědecký časopis s otevřeným přístupem, což znamená, že veškerý obsah je volně k dispozici bez poplatku pro uživatele nebo instituci. Uživatelé mohou číst, stahovat, kopírovat, distribuovat, tisknout, vyhledávat nebo odkazovat na plné texty článků v tomto časopise, aniž by potřebovali předchozí povolení od vydavatele nebo autora.

Recenzovaný vědecký časopis vychází dvakrát ročně, v červnu a v prosinci.

Časopis je abstraktován a indexován v CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.

Dlouhodobou archivaci elektronického obsahu časopisu zajišťuje Portico.

HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 6 No 2 (2014), 9–42

Goals and Behaviour

Milan Stuchlík

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2014.1
zveřejněno: 10. 12. 2014

Abstract

In the first part of this paper I intend to argue that anthropologists have a predominantly causal conception of explanation and that the only feasible way to avoid this is to apply consistently the assumption of goal-orientation of behaviour, that is to hold what could broadly be called a teleological conception of explanation – a view that developments are due to the purpose or design that is served by them. Further on I will try to show that groups and norms do not exist and act independently of people. They have no existence as “things” apart from forming a part of the relevant stock of knowledge of the members of society. They can be brought to bear on actions only by people invoking them. Thus we have to make a sharp distinction between the conceptual or notional level of phenomena, and the transactional or processual level, sometimes known as cultural and social respectively.

klíčová slova: goal orientation of behaviour; groups; norms; causal explanation of behaviour; individual strategies

reference (41)

1. Antoun, R. T. [1967]. Social organization and the life cycle in an Arab village. Ethnology (6): 294–308. CrossRef

2. Appell, G. N. [1967]. Observational procedures for identifying kindreds: Social isolates among the Rungus of Borneo. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (23): 192–207. CrossRef

3. Barnes, J. A. [1967]. Agnation among the Engga: a review article. Oceania (38): 33–43. CrossRef

4. Barth, F. [1959]. Political leadership among Swat Pathans. London: LSE Monograph on Social Anthropology No. 19.

5. Berger, P. L. – Luckmann, T. [1972 (1966)]. The social construction of reality. London: Penguin Books. Bohannan, P. [1957]. Justice and Judgement among the Tiv. London: Oxford University Press. Cancian, F. [1975]. What are Norms? Cambridge University Press.

6. Deutscher, I. [1966]. Words and deeds: Social science and Social policy. Social Problems (13): 235–254. Douglas, J. P. (ed.) [1971]. Understanding everyday life. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

7. Douglas, J. P. (ed.) [1970]. Witchcraft confessions and accusations. London: ASA Monographs 9, Tavistock Publications.

8. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. [1940]. The Nuer. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Firth, R. [1951]. Elements of social organization. London: Watts.

9. Fortes, M. [1945]. The dynamics of clanship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.

10. Fortes, M. [1953]. The structure of unilineal descent groups. In. Goody, J. [1971]. Kinship. London: Penguin Books.

11. Fortes, M. [1969 (1949)]. The web of kinship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press. Freeman, J. D. [1961]. On the concept of the kindred. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (91). Garfinkel, H. [1967]. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

12. Gibbs, J. P. [1965]. Norms: the problem of definiton and classification. Am. Journal of Sociology (60): 586–594. CrossRef

13. Goodenough, W. [1955]. A problem in Malayo-Polynesian social organization. American Anthropologist (57): 71–83. CrossRef

14. Goodenough, W. [1965]. Rethinking "status" and "role". In. The relevance of models for social anthropology. London: ASA Monographs 1, Tavistock Publications. Goody, J. [1971]. Kinship. London: Penguin Books.

15. Harris, M. [1968]. The rise of anthropological theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

16. Heath, A. F. [1976]. Decision making and transactional theory. In. Kapferer, B. (ed.). Transaction and meaning. London: ASA Essays in Social Anthropology Vol. 1.

17. Holy, L. [1967]. The social consequences of dia. Africa XXXVII: 466–478. CrossRef

18. Holy, L. (ed.). [1967]. Knowledge and Behaviour. Queen's University Papers in Social Anthropology, Vol 1.

19. Holy, L. [1976a]. Kin Groups: Structural analysis and the study of behaviour. Annual Review of Anthropology V. CrossRef

20. Holy, L. [1976b]. Knowledge and behaviour. In Holy, L. (ed.). Knowledge and behaviour. Belfast: Queen's Univeristy Papers in Social Anthropology Vol. 1. CrossRef

21. Howard, A. [1963]. Land, activity systems and decision-making models in Rotuma. Ethnology (2): 407–440. CrossRef

22. Keesing, R. M. [1967]. Statistical models and decision models of social structure: a Kwaio case. Ethnology (6): 1–16. CrossRef

23. Keesing, R. M. [1969]. On quibblings over squabblings of sublings: new perspecive on kin terms and role behaviour. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology (25): 207–227. CrossRef

24. Keesing, R. M. [1970a]. Shrines, ancestors and cognatic descent: the Kwaio and Tallensi. American Anthropologist (72): 755–775. CrossRef

25. Keesing, R. M. [1970b]. Descent, residence and cultural codes. In. Hiatt – Jayawardena (eds.). Anthropology in Oceania. Sydney: Angus and Robertson.

26. Lepervanche, M. de. [1967–1968]. Descent, residence an leadership in the New Guinea Highlands. Oceania (38): 134–158; 163–189. CrossRef

27. MacIntyre, H. [1967]. Mistake about causality in social sciences. In. Laslett – Runciman (eds.). Philosophy, politics and society. Oxford: Blackwell.

28. Nadel, S. F. [1951]. Foundations of social anthropology. London: Cohen and West.

29. Paine, R. [1974]. Second thoughts about Barth's model. London: RAI Occasional Paper No. 32. Pehrson, R. [1964]. Bilateral kin groupings. In. Goody, J. [1971]. Kinship. London: Penguin Books.

30. Peters, E. L. [1967]. Some structural aspects of the feud among the camel-herding Bedouins of Dyrenaica. Africa XXXVII: 261–282. CrossRef

31. Pospisil, L. [1964 (1958)]. Kapauku Papuans and their law. Human Relations Area File Press.

32. Rappaport, R. [1967]. Ritual regulation of environmental relations among a New Guinea people. Ethnology (6): 17–30. CrossRef

33. Scheffler, H. W. [1965]. Choiseul Island social structure. University of California Press.

34. Scheffler, H. W. [1966]. Ancestor worship in anthropology: or observations on descent and descent groups. Current Anthropology (7): 541–551.

35. Schneider, D. W. [1965]. Some muddles in the models. In. The relevance of models in Social Anthropology. ASA Monographs 1, London: Tavistock Publications.

36. Stanner, W. E. H. [1958–1959]. Continuity and schism in an African tribe: a review. Oceania (28): 208–217. Strathern, A. [1971]. The rope of moka. Cambridge University Press.

37. Strathern, A. [1972]. One father, one blood. Canberra: Australian National University Press. Stuchlik, M. [1976]. Whose knowledge? In. Holy, L. (ed.) Knowledge and Behaviour.

38. Stuchlik, M. [1976a]. Land tenure on the contemporary Mapuche reservations. In. Holy, L. (ed.) Knowledge and Behaviour.

39. Stuchlik, M. [1976b]. Life on half-share: Mechanisms of social recruitment among the Mapuche of Southern Chile. London: Hurst.

40. White, A. R. (ed) [1968]. The philosophy of action. Oxford University Press. Williams, R. M. [1960]. The American Society. New York: Alfred Knopf.

41. Wright, G. H. von. [1971]. Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Creative Commons License
Goals and Behaviour is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 120 Kč
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525

Ke stažení