AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA
AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA

AUC Philosophica et Historica je víceoborový akademický časopis zaměřený na humanitní a společenskovědné obory (filozofie, psychologie, pedagogika, sociologie, obecné, české a hospodářské dějiny, pomocné vědy historické a archivnictví, etnologie).

Časopis je indexován v databázích CEEOL, DOAJ a EBSCO.

AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA, Vol 2022 No 2 (2022), 9–22

Princip závazku a konzistence chování

[The Principle of Commitment and Consistency of Behavior]

Alexandra Menting

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2025.8
zveřejněno: 12. 08. 2025

Abstract

This article’s focus is on the application of the principle of commitment and consistency, which speaks of the fact that the moment we make a commitment, we increase the likelihood that we will maintain consistent behaviour in the matter to which we have committed ourselves. An experimental study on the principle of commitment and consistency of behaviour examines the effect of signing an informed consent containing an instruction not to cheat on the consistency of behaviour – that is, whether an individual will truly not cheat – under the influence of normative social influence. Based on the data obtained, a medium to strong and statistically significant relationship was found between commitment and behaviour. It has been found that half of the participants, when having made a commitment, maintain consistent behaviour even when conditions directly encourage them to be inconsistent. The results show that this is an effective principle of persuasion that works automatically and without us even realising it.

klíčová slova: behavioural economics; persuasion; commitment; consistency of behaviour

reference (34)

1. Allgeier, A. R., Byrne, D., Brooks, B., & Revnes, D. (1979). The waffle phenomenon: Negative evaluations of those who shift attitudinally. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 170-182. CrossRef

2. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290. CrossRef

3. Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 553, 452-454. CrossRef

4. Becker, H. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-40. CrossRef

5. Borodaeva, Z., Chipeeva, N., Maslennikova, E., Feklicheva, I., Soldatova, E., Esipenko, E., Sharafieva, K., Ismatullina, V., Malykh, S., & Kovas, Y. (2018). Stem gender gap and intra-individual strengths in maths and Russian language. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, 55, 133-144. CrossRef

6. Buchanan, T. (1985). Commitment and leisure behavior: A theoretical perspective. Leisure Sciences, 7(4), 401-420. CrossRef

7. Camerer, C. F. (2020). Introduction. In A. Samson (Ed.), The Behavioral Economics Guide 2020 (pp. VII-XV). https://www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/the-behavioral-economics-guide-2020/

8. Cialdini, R. B., Cacioppo, J. T., Bassett, R., & Miller, J. A. (1978). Low-ball procedure for producing compliance: Commitment then cost. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 463-476. CrossRef

9. Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: Science and practice (Rev. ed.). Harper Business.

10. Cialdini, R. B. (2016). Před-svědčování. Jan Melvil Publishing.

11. Crandall, C. S., & Sherman, J. (2016). On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 93-99. CrossRef

12. Crosby, L., & Taylor, J. (1983). Psychological commitment and its effects on post-decision evaluation and preference stability among voters. The Journal of Consumer Research, 9(4), 413-431. CrossRef

13. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629-636. CrossRef

14. Disman, M. (2002). Jak se vyrábí sociologická znalost. Karolinum.

15. Dunfield, K. A., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2010). Intention-mediated selective helping in infancy. Psychological Science, 21(4), 523-527. CrossRef

16. Freedman, J. L. (1965). Long-term behavioral effects of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(2), 145-155. CrossRef

17. Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195-202. CrossRef

18. Gahwiler, P., & Havitz, M. E. (1998). Toward a relational understanding of leisure social worlds, involvement, psychological commitment, and behavioral loyalty. Leisure Sciences, 20, 1-23. CrossRef

19. Gálik, S. (2012). Psychologie přesvědčování. Grada.

20. Gerard, H. B. (1968). Basic features of commitment. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. McGuire, T. Newcomb, M. Rosenberg, & P. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 456-463). Rand McNally.

21. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995-1006. CrossRef

22. Kahneman, D. (2012). Myšlení: rychlé a pomalé. Jan Melvil Publishing.

23. Knox, R. E., & Inkster, J. A. (1968). Postdecision dissonance at post time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4, Pt. 1), 319-323. CrossRef

24. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371-378. CrossRef

25. Nosek, B. A., & Errington, T. M. (2017). Making sense of replications. eLife, 6. CrossRef

26. Regan, D. T., & Kilduff, M. (1988). Optimism about elections: Dissonance reduction at the ballot box. Political Psychology, 9(1), 101-107. CrossRef

27. Romero, F. (2019). Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis. Philosophy Compass, 14(11), e12633. CrossRef

28. Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90-100. CrossRef

29. Shoemaker, D., Snizek, W., & Bryant, C. (1977). Toward a further clarification of Becker's side-bet hypothesis as applied to organizational and occupational commitment. Social Forces, 56(2), 598-603. CrossRef

30. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man, social and rational: Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. Wiley.

31. Stanovich, K., & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-665. CrossRef

32. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. CrossRef

33. Whitley, B. E., Jr., Nelson, A. B., & Jones, C. J. (1999). Academic cheating in early childhood: Role of age, gender, personality, and self-efficacy. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 41(9-10), 657-680. CrossRef

34. Zaltman, G., & Wallendorf, M. (1983). Consumer behavior: Basic findings and management implications. Wiley & Sons.

Creative Commons License
Princip závazku a konzistence chování is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


vychází: 2 x ročně
ISSN: 0567-8293
E-ISSN: 2464-7055

Ke stažení