Orbis scholae is an academic journal published by Charles University, Prague. It features articles on school education in the wider socio-cultural context. It aims to contribute to our understanding and the development of school education, and to the reflection of teaching practice and educational policy.
Practice What You Teach: A Video-Based Practicum Model of Professional Development for Elementary Science Teachers
Eric Berson, Hilda Borko, Susan Million, Edit Khachatryan, Kerri Glennon
announced: 01. 02. 2018
This study examines an innovative professional development program that provides teachers with an opportunity to practice pedagogical strategies in a low stakes classroom context. Elementary teachers participated in a one-week summer Institute and two-week Practicum focused on learning strategies for facilitating scientific discourse and argumentation in their classrooms. During the Practicum, teachers taught lessons in a summer program for elementary school students and engaged in daily video-based discussions to reflect on their instruction. This study identified the instructional practices that were most emphasized during the Institute and examined the extent to which teachers took up those practices during the subsequent practicum experience. A classroom vignette illustrates how one teacher engaged her students in the discourse practices, and a coaching vignette portrays her video reflection group’s discussion of the episode. Findings suggest that the focal instructional practices were taken up to different degrees during the Practicum, and that opportunities for practice and reflection are potentially valuable features of professional development programs. The project illustrates the value of video as a tool for both professional development and research.
keywords: professional development; science talk; pedagogy; science education; science instruction; classroom video
1. Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626−639. CrossRef
2. Bell, C. A., Wilson, S. M., Higgins, T., & McCoach, D. B. (2010). Measuring the effects of professional development on teacher knowledge: The case of developing mathematical ideas. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(5), 479−512.
3. Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 548−556). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossRef
5. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Seago, N. & Mangram, C. (2014). Facilitating video-based professional development: Planning and orchestrating productive discussions. In Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 259−281). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. CrossRef
6. Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73−105. CrossRef
7. Chi, B., Visintainer, T., Chung, J., de Nova, J., & Sacco, K. (2011). ¡Youth & the Ocean! (¡YO!) Final Evaluation Report, 2007−2010. Report prepared for NSF Geosciences Directorate for OEDG Grant #0703812.
8. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181−199. CrossRef
9. Garet, M. S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., … Sztejnberg, L. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement (NCEE 2008−4030). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
10. Garet, M. S., Wayne, A. J., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., … Doolittle, F. (2011). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011−4024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
11. Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333−362. CrossRef
12. Jacobs, J., Borko, H., & Koellner, K. (2009). The power of video as a tool for professional development and research: Examples from the problem-solving cycle. In T. Janik & T. Seidel (Eds.), The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom (pp. 259−273). Munster: Waxmann Publishing.
13. Jennings, L., & Mills, H. (2009). Constructing a discourse of inquiry: Findings from a five-year ethnography at one elementary school. Teachers College Record, 111(7), 1583−1618. Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2015). Distinguishing models of professional development: The case of an adaptive model's impact on teachers' knowledge, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 51−67.
14. Martin, A. M., & Hand, B. (2009). Factors affecting the implementation of argument in the elementary science classroom. A longitudinal case study. Research in Science Education, 39(1), 17−38. CrossRef
15. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of 53 helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359−377. CrossRef
16. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2011). Ocean Sciences Curriculum Sequences for Grades 3−5. Available from http://mare.lawrencehallofscience.org/sites/mare.lawrencehallofscience.org/files/images/OSS%203-5%20Sampler%20Web_2015%20%281%29.pdf
17. Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463−466. CrossRef
18. Penuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in Earth systems science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 996−1025. CrossRef
19. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 21(1), 4−15. CrossRef
20. Resnick, L. B., Michaels, S., & O'Connor, C. (in press). How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In R. Sternberg & D. Preiss (Eds.), From Genes to Context: New Discoveries about learning from educational research and their applications. New York: Springer.
21. Ryan, G., Toohey, S., & Hughes, C. (1996). The purpose, value and structure of the practicum in higher education: A literature review. Higher Education, 31(3), 355−377. CrossRef
22. Seago, N. M., Jacobs, J. K., Heck, D. J., Nelson, C. L., & Malzahn, K. A. (2014). Impacting teachers' understanding of geometric similarity: Results from field testing of the Learning and teaching geometry professional development materials. Professional Development in Education, 40(4), 627−653. CrossRef
23. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: Using video in teacher education (pp. 1−27). Oxford: Elsevier.
24. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers' thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155−176. CrossRef
25. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef
26. Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310−313. CrossRef
27. Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35−62. CrossRef
Practice What You Teach: A Video-Based Practicum Model of Professional Development for Elementary Science Teachers is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
published: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk