Orbis scholae is an academic journal published by Charles University, Prague. It features articles on school education in the wider socio-cultural context. It aims to contribute to our understanding and the development of school education, and to the reflection of teaching practice and educational policy.
Video Clubs: EFL Teachers’ Selective Attention Before and After
Eva Minaříková, Michaela Píšová, Tomáš Janík, Klára Uličná
announced: 01. 02. 2018
The paper aims to introduce results of a study of the effects of participation in video clubs on EFL (English as a Foreign Language) teachers’ selective attention. It is a part of a larger project concerned with EFL teachers’ professional vision. The paper introduces the theoretical background of study on teachers’ professional vision and selective attention and the rationale of video clubs used specifically for EFL teachers. 11 EFL teachers participated in this year-long study and attended video club meetings that aimed to foster their professional vision for conscious development of pupils’ communicative competence. They were interviewed at the beginning and at the end of the programme; video sequences of their own teaching and of other teacher’s teaching were used as prompts. The transcribed data were analysed using a theory-driven system of categories describing the areas of teachers’ selective attention (i.e. aims, context, content, pupil/s, teacher, process). The results suggest that after participating in video clubs the teachers paid more attention to aims and content, and less to the teacher. The results for the category of pupil(s) differed for the own/other video sequence. As the development of communicative competence represents the ultimate goal of EFL teaching, it is encouraging that after the intervention the teachers’ comments were more aim and content oriented.
keywords: professional vision; selective attention; video in teacher education; video clubs; English as a foreign language; teacher education; teacher professional development
1. Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Blomber, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Effects of viewers teaching subjects and the subject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131−1140. CrossRef
3. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press.
4. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417−436. CrossRef
5. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2004). Using video in teacher education. Oxford: Elsevier. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1−47.
6. Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. (2001). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (1995). Cognitive psychology. A student's handbook. Hove: Psychology Press.
8. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education, 20 (pp. 3−56). Washington: American Educational Research Association. CrossRef
9. Glaser, R., & Chi, M. T. (1988). Overview. In M. T. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv−xxviii). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
10. Gold, B., Förster, S., & Holodynski, M. (2013). Evaluation eines videobasierten Trainingsseminars zur Förderung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Klassenführung im Grundschulunterricht. Zeitschrift für pädagogische Psychologie, 27(3), 141−155. CrossRef
11. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606−633. CrossRef
12. Grossman, P. (1995). Content as context: The role of school subjects in secondary school teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(8), 5−23. CrossRef
13. Heimann, P., Otto, G., & Schulz, W. (1969). Unterricht, Analyse und Planung. Hannover: Schroedel.
14. Jacobs, J. K., & Morita, E. (2002). Japanese and American teachers' evaluations of videotaped mathematics lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 154−175. CrossRef
15. Jacobs, V., Philipp, R., & Sherin, M. (2011). Preface. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathmatics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. xxv−xxvii). New York: Routledge.
16. Janík, T., Janíková, M., Knecht, P., Kubiatko, M., Najvar, P., Najvarová, V., & Šebestová, S. (2009). Exploring different ways of using video in teacher education: Examples from CPV Video Web. In T. Janík, & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in classroom (pp. 207−224). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.
17. Kansanen, P. (2009). The curious affair of pedagogical content knowledge. Orbis scholae, 3(2), 5−18.
18. Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., Borko, H., Schneider, C., Pittman, M. E., Eiteljorg, E., Bunning, K., & Frykholm, J. (2007). The Problem-Solving Cycle: A model to support the development of teachers' professional knowledge. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 9(3), 273−303. CrossRef
19. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Freeman, D. (2008). Language moves: The place of "foreign" languages in classroom teaching and learning. Review of Research in Education, 32, 147−186. CrossRef
21. Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319−326. CrossRef
22. Píšová, M. (2005). Klinický rok: procesy profesního rozvoje studentů učitelství a jejich podpora [Clinical year: professional development processes in student teachers and their support]. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice, Fakulta humanitních studií.
23. Píšová, M., & Janík, T. (2011). On the nature of expert teacher knowledge. Orbis Scholae, 5(2), 95−115.
24. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4−15. CrossRef
25. Savignon, S. J. (1983). Communicative competence: theory and classroom practice; texts and contexts in second language learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
26. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., & Stürmer, K. (2010). OBSERVE − Validierung eines videobasierten Instruments zur Erfassung der professionellen Wahrnehmung von Unterricht. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 56(Beiheft), 296−306.
27. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259−267. CrossRef
28. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383−396). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
29. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathmatics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers' eyes. New York: Routledge.
30. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Situating the study of teacher noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathmatics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 3−13). New York: Routledge.
31. Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27−46.
32. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20−37. CrossRef
33. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4−14. CrossRef
34. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1−22. CrossRef
35. Star, J. R., Lynch, K., & Perova, N. (2011). Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' abilities to attend to classroom features: A replication study. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathmatics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers' eyes (pp. 117−133). New York: Routledge.
36. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 107−125 CrossRef
37. Stürmer, K., Könings, K. D., & Seidel, T. (2013). Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: Effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 467−483. CrossRef
38. Van Ek, J. A. (1986). Objectives for foreign language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Available from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/sourcepublications/scope_vanek_en.doc
39. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in "learning to notice". Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(4), 125−135.
40. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244−276. CrossRef
41. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers' thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 113(2), 55−176. CrossRef
42. Wolff, C. E. (2014, June). Teachers' processing of problematic classroom situations. Paper presented at the EARLI SIG 11 conference, Frauenchiemsee, Germany.
Video Clubs: EFL Teachers’ Selective Attention Before and After is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
published: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk