Mluvit, či nemluvit? Participace na výukové komunikaci očima vokálních a tichých žáků a jejich učitelek

This study is based on the well-known fact that different students in the same classroom participate differently in classroom discourse. Some students are vocal, often and willingly raise their voice, whereas others remain silent. Although many studies are dealing with student participation patterns, the inner perspective of students and their point of view are explored very rarely. We conducted an ethnographic inquiry in language arts lessons in four ninth grade classes. We took video recordings of lessons as well as interviews with students and their teachers. In this study, we analyse interview data with the aim to understand classroom discourse participation patterns and to identify meanings of these patterns as perceived by students and their teachers. We focus on differences between vocal and silent students as well as differences between high-achieving and low-achieving students. Our analysis shows that student participation behaviour is linked to learning opportunities that students gain. Also, student participation behaviour has a noticeable impact on how competent and intelligent appear to themselves and their teachers. Concerning this, silent low-achieving students are heavily disadvantaged.

1. Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.

2. Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.

3. Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598. CrossRef

4. Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598. CrossRef

5. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school english. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730. CrossRef

6. Applebee, A. N., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school english. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 685-730. CrossRef

7. Black, L. (2004). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34-54.

8. Black, L. (2004). Differential participation in whole-class discussions and the construction of marginalised identities. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(1), 34-54.

9. Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1-2), 20-30. CrossRef

10. Black, L. (2007). Analysing cultural models in socio-cultural discourse analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1-2), 20-30. CrossRef

11. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(5), 365-374. CrossRef

12. Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(5), 365-374. CrossRef

13. Brown, B. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834. CrossRef

14. Brown, B. (2004). Discursive identity: Assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 810-834. CrossRef

15. Clarke. S. N. (2015). The right to speak. In L. B. Resnick, Ch. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (s. 167-180). Washington: AERA.

16. Clarke. S. N. (2015). The right to speak. In L. B. Resnick, Ch. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (s. 167-180). Washington: AERA.

17. Clarke, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 27-39. CrossRef

18. Clarke, S. N., Howley, I., Resnick, L., & Rosé, C. P. (2016). Student agency to participate in dialogic science discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 10, 27-39. CrossRef

19. Drexlerová, A. (2018). Kluků je škoda, holky na to nemají: Genderové aspekty v hodnocení nejslabších žáků třídy. Studia paedagogica, 23(1), 9-28. CrossRef

20. Drexlerová, A. (2018). Kluků je škoda, holky na to nemají: Genderové aspekty v hodnocení nejslabších žáků třídy. Studia paedagogica, 23(1), 9-28. CrossRef

21. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.

22. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Anchor Books.

23. Hall, L. A., Johnson, A. S., Juzwik, M. M., Wortham, S. E., & Mosley, M. (2010). Teacher identity in the context of literacy teaching: Three explorations of classroom positioning and interaction in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 234-243. CrossRef

24. Hall, L. A., Johnson, A. S., Juzwik, M. M., Wortham, S. E., & Mosley, M. (2010). Teacher identity in the context of literacy teaching: Three explorations of classroom positioning and interaction in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 234-243. CrossRef

25. Helgevold, N. (2016). Teaching as creating space for participation - establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 315-328. CrossRef

26. Helgevold, N. (2016). Teaching as creating space for participation - establishing a learning community in diverse classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 22(3), 315-328. CrossRef

27. Howe, Ch., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review accross four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325-356. CrossRef

28. Howe, Ch., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review accross four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325-356. CrossRef

29. Hrabal, V.,  Pavelková, I. (2010). Jaký jsem učitel. Praha: Portál.

30. Hrabal, V.,  Pavelková, I. (2010). Jaký jsem učitel. Praha: Portál.

31. Hrabal, V.,  Pavelková, I. (2011). Školní výkonová motivace žáků: Dotazník pro žáky. Praha: Národní ústav odborného vzdělávání.

32. Hrabal, V.,  Pavelková, I. (2011). Školní výkonová motivace žáků: Dotazník pro žáky. Praha: Národní ústav odborného vzdělávání.

33. Ing, M., Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. H. (2015). Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: The missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 341-356.

34. Ing, M., Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. H. (2015). Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: The missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90(3), 341-356.

35. Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23(1), 33-42. CrossRef

36. Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013). How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction. Learning and Instruction, 23(1), 33-42. CrossRef

37. Kelly, S. (2008). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434-448. CrossRef

38. Kelly, S. (2008). Race, social class, and student engagement in middle school English classrooms. Social Science Research, 37(2), 434-448. CrossRef

39. Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3-4), 141-158. CrossRef

40. Kovalainen, M., & Kumpulainen, K. (2007). The social construction of participation in an elementary classroom community. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(3-4), 141-158. CrossRef

41. Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students' discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23-31. CrossRef

42. Kumpulainen, K., & Rajala, A. (2017). Dialogic teaching and students' discursive identity negotiation in the learning of science. Learning and Instruction, 48, 23-31. CrossRef

43. Lefstein, A., & Snell J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. London: Routledge.

44. Lefstein, A., & Snell J. (2014). Better than best practice: Developing teaching and learning through dialogue. London: Routledge.

45. Mead, G. H. (2017). Mysl, já a společnost. Praha: Portál.

46. Mead, G. H. (2017). Mysl, já a společnost. Praha: Portál.

47. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge. CrossRef

48. Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children's thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge. CrossRef

49. Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A.-M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2018). Quality of educational dialogue and association with students' academic performance. Learning and Instruction, 55, 67-79. CrossRef

50. Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A.-M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2018). Quality of educational dialogue and association with students' academic performance. Learning and Instruction, 55, 67-79. CrossRef

51. Myhill, D. (2002). Bad boys and good girls? Patterns of interaction and response in whole class teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339-352. CrossRef

52. Myhill, D. (2002). Bad boys and good girls? Patterns of interaction and response in whole class teaching. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339-352. CrossRef

53. O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). "Scalling down" to explore the role of talk in learning: From disctrict intervention to controlled classroom study. In L. B. Resnick, Ch. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (s. 111-126). Washington: AERA.

54. O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). "Scalling down" to explore the role of talk in learning: From disctrict intervention to controlled classroom study. In L. B. Resnick, Ch. S. C. Asterhan, & S. N. Clarke (Eds.), Socializing intelligence through academic talk and dialogue (s. 111-126). Washington: AERA.

55. Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, Ch. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2017). Student discourse for learning. In G. E. Hall, D. M. Gollnick, & L. F. Qzinn (Eds.). Handbook of teaching and learning. Wiley: Wiley-Blackwell.

56. Resnick, L. B., Asterhan, Ch. S. C., & Clarke, S. N. (2017). Student discourse for learning. In G. E. Hall, D. M. Gollnick, & L. F. Qzinn (Eds.). Handbook of teaching and learning. Wiley: Wiley-Blackwell.

57. Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik., M., Navratilova, A., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (v recenzním řízení). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement.

58. Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik., M., Navratilova, A., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (v recenzním řízení). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement.

59. Seidel, T. (2006). The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching-learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 9, 253-271. CrossRef

60. Seidel, T. (2006). The role of student characteristics in studying micro teaching-learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 9, 253-271. CrossRef

61. Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). "Low ability", participation, and identity in dialogic pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40-78. CrossRef

62. Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). "Low ability", participation, and identity in dialogic pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40-78. CrossRef

63. Šeďová, K. (2016). Co je dialogické vyučování. In K. Šeďová, R. Švaříček, M. Sedláček, & Z. Šalamounová, Jak se učitelé učí. Cestou profesního rozvoje k dialogickému vyučování (s. 11-64). Brno: MU.

64. Šeďová, K. (2016). Co je dialogické vyučování. In K. Šeďová, R. Švaříček, M. Sedláček, & Z. Šalamounová, Jak se učitelé učí. Cestou profesního rozvoje k dialogickému vyučování (s. 11-64). Brno: MU.

65. Šeďová, K., Sucháček, P., & Majcík, M. (2015). Kdopak to mluví? Participace žáků ve výukové komunikaci na druhém stupni základní školy. Pedagogika, 65(2), 143-162.

66. Šeďová, K., Sucháček, P., & Majcík, M. (2015). Kdopak to mluví? Participace žáků ve výukové komunikaci na druhém stupni základní školy. Pedagogika, 65(2), 143-162.

67. Šeďová, K., & Šalamounová, Z. (2016). Teacher expectancies, teacher behaviour and students'participation in classroom discourse. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 15(1), 44-61.

68. Šeďová, K., & Šalamounová, Z. (2016). Teacher expectancies, teacher behaviour and students'participation in classroom discourse. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 15(1), 44-61.

69. Šeďová, K., Švaříček, R., & Šalamounová, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě. Praha: Portál.

70. Šeďová, K., Švaříček, R., & Šalamounová, Z. (2012). Komunikace ve školní třídě. Praha: Portál.

71. Triplett, Ch. F. (2007). The social construction of "struggle": Influences of school literacy contexts, curriculum, and relationships. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 95-126. CrossRef

72. Triplett, Ch. F. (2007). The social construction of "struggle": Influences of school literacy contexts, curriculum, and relationships. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 95-126. CrossRef

73. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others' mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 79-93. CrossRef

74. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others' mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 79-93. CrossRef

75. Zormanová, L. (2009). Gender ve vzdělávání dětí a mládeže na ZŠ: srovnání míry aktivity chlapců a dívek ve výuce občanské výchovy na základní škole (Disertační práce). Brno: PedF MU. Dostupné z http://is.muni.cz/th/239706/pedf_d/

76. Zormanová, L. (2009). Gender ve vzdělávání dětí a mládeže na ZŠ: srovnání míry aktivity chlapců a dívek ve výuce občanské výchovy na základní škole (Disertační práce). Brno: PedF MU. Dostupné z http://is.muni.cz/th/239706/pedf_d/