Curricular Differentiation and Stratification in Australia

This paper examines curricular differentiation and stratification in the Australian education system. Our aim is to contribute to the development of a comparative framework about curricular differentiation and stratification in national systems of education. Using a typology from LeTender, Hofer and Shimizu (2003), we show how and where curricular differentiation and stratification occur in Australia. We draw on secondary sources and our insider, lived knowledge to show how and where curricular differentiation and stratification occur as well as the structural features of Australian schooling that mediate them. Curricular differentiation and stratification are not widely researched in the Australian context, suggesting that these processes are naturalised. As such, this paper presents preliminary insights that can serve as a foundation for future research.

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). 4221.0 − Schools, Australia, 2015. Canberra: Author.

2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016). Australian curriculum. Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/

3. Anderson, D. (1992). The interaction of public and private school systems. Australian Journal of Education, 36(3), 213−236. CrossRef

4. Anyon, J. (1981). Social class and social knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 235−246. CrossRef

5. Applecross Senior High School. (2016). Gifted and talented program. Retrieved February 15, 2016, from http://www.applecross.wa.edu.au/gifted-talented-program

6. Barnard-Brak, L., McGaha-Gamett, V., & Burley, H. (2011). Advanced Placement course enrollment and school-level characteristics. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 95(3), 165−174. CrossRef

7. Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards. (2016). HSC syllabuses. Retrieved February 3, 2016, from http://www.boardofstudies.nsw.edu.au/syllabus_hsc/

8. Burris, C. C., Welner, K., & Bezoza, J. W. (2009). Universal access to a quality education: Research and recommendations for the elimination of curricular stratification. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center.

9. Council of Australian Governments. (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra: Author.

10. Department of Education and Training. (2013). Selective high schools entry in year 7 2013. Sydney: Public Schools NSW.

11. Dupriez, V., Dumay, X., & Vause, A. (2008). How do school systems manage pupils' heterogeneity? Comparative Education Review, 52, 245−273. CrossRef

12. Fenwick, L. (2012). Limiting opportunities to learn in upper‐secondary schooling: Differentiation and performance assessment in the context of standards‐based curriculum reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(5), 629−651. CrossRef

13. Finnish National Board of Education. (2016). Upper secondary education and training. Retrieved February 19, 2016, from http://www.oph.fi/english/education_system/upper_secondary_education_and_training

14. Gamoran, A. (1987). The stratification of high school learning opportunities. Sociology of Education, 60(3), 135−155. CrossRef

15. Gamoran, A. (2000). Is ability grouping equitable? In R. Arum & I. R. Beattie (Eds.), The structure of schooling: Readings in the sociology of education (pp. 234−240). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

16. Gordon, S., & Nicholas, J. (2013). Prior decisions and experiences about mathematics of students in bridging courses. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(7), 1081−1091. CrossRef

17. Grubb, W. N. (1985). The convergence of educational systems and the role of vocationalism. Comparative Education Review, 29(4), 526−548. CrossRef

18. Hallinan, M. T. (2000). Tracking: From theory to practice. In R. Arum & I. R. Beattie (Eds.), The structure of schooling: Readings in the sociology of education (pp. 218−224). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.

19. Hanushek, E. A., & Wößmann, L. (2006). Does early tracking affect educational inequality and performance? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries. Economic Journal, 116(510), C63−C76. CrossRef

20. Higley, J., Deacon, D., & Smart, D. (1979). Elites in Australia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

21. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission. (2000). National inquiry into rural and remote education. Sydney: Author.

22. Klugman, J. (2013). The Advanced Placement arms race and the reproduction of educational inequality. Teachers College Record, 115(5), 1−34.

23. Lamb, S., & Fullarton, S. (2002). Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS. Australian Journal of Education, 46(2), 154−173. CrossRef

24. Lamb, S., Hogan, D., & Johnson, T. (2001). The stratification of learning opportunities and achievement in Tasmanian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 45(2), 153−167. CrossRef

25. Lamb, S., Jackson, J., Walstab, A., & Huo, S. (2015). Educational opportunity in Australia 2015: Who succeeds and who misses out. Melbourne: Mitchell Institute and Centre for International Research on Education Systems, Victoria University.

26. Lessard, V., Larose, S., Duchesne, S., & Feng, B. (2014). Tracking in high school mathematics: Individual, social, and school-based determinants in an education reform context. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 4(2), 102−116. CrossRef

27. LeTendre, G. K., Hofer, B. K., & Shimizu, H. (2003). What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany and Japan. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 43−89. CrossRef

28. Mons, N. (2007). Les nouvelles politiques éducatives: La France fait-elle les bons choix? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. CrossRef

29. Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

30. Orfield, G. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of education. New York: New Press.

31. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010a). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background − equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Vol. 2). Paris: Author.

32. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: What makes a school successful? Resources, policies and practices (Vol. 4). Paris: Author.

33. Perry, L. B., Lubienski, C., & Ladwig, J. G. (2016). How do learning environments vary by school sector and socioeconomic composition? Evidence from Australian students. Australian Journal of Education, (3), 175−190. CrossRef

34. Perry, L. B., Lubienski, C., & Ladwig, J. G. (2015). Opportunity to learn high status academic curricula in Western Australian secondary schools. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle.

35. Perry, L. B., & Southwell, L. (2014). Access to academic curriculum in Australian secondary schools: A case study of a highly marketised education system. Journal of Education Policy, 29(4), 467−485. CrossRef

36. Portes, P. R. (2005). Dismantling educational inequality: A cultural-historical approach to closing the achievement gap. New York: Peter Lang.

37. Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). National curricula: World models and national historical legacies. In M. Caruso & H.-E. Tenorth (Eds.), Comparing educational systems and semantics (pp. 91−107). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

38. Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Does segregation still matter? The impact of student composition on academic achievement in high school. Teachers College Record, 107(9), 1999−2045.

39. Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73(January), 39−67. CrossRef

40. Ryan, C., & Watson, L. (2004). The drift to private schools in Australia: Understanding its features. Canberra: Centre for Economic Policy Research, Australian National University. SCASA. (2016). Syllabus and support materials. Retrieved February 3, 2016, from http://wace1516.scsa.wa.edu.au/syllabus-and-support-materials/science

41. Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371−386. CrossRef

42. Tate, W. F. (1997). Race-ethnicity, SES, gender, and language proficiency trends in mathematics achievement: An update. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(6), 652−679. CrossRef

43. Teese, R. (2007). Stuctural inequality in Australian education. In R. Teese, S. Lamb & M. Duru-Bellat (Eds.), International studies in educational inequality, theory and policy (Vol. Two, pp. 39−62). Dordrecht: Springer.

44. Teese, R. (2011). From opportunity to outcomes. The changing role of public schooling in Australia and national funding arrangements. Melbourne: Centre for Research on Education Systems, University of Melbourne.

45. Teese, R., & Polesel, J. (2003). Undemocratic schooling: Equity and quality in mass secondary education in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.

46. VCAA. (2016). Victorian certificate of education. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/Pages/vce/index.aspx

47. Victoria State Government Education and Training. (2016). Languages policy and legislative requirements. from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/teachingresources/discipline/languages/Pages/research.aspx

48. Watson, L., & Ryan, C. (2010). Choosers and losers: The impact of government subsidies on Australian secondary schools. Australian Journal of Education, 54(1), 86−107. CrossRef

49. Werblow, J., Urick, A., & Duesbery, L. (2013). On the wrong track: How tracking is associated with dropping out of high school. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(2), 270−284. CrossRef

50. Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: Implications of ability grouping in the middle years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 607−619. CrossRef