HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE

HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE

Interdisciplinární časopis se zaměřuje především ze sociologického, politologického a historického hlediska na problematiku dlouhodobých sociálních procesů a trendů, modernizace, globalizačních tendencí a vlivů. Časopis vytváří širší platformu pro badatele v historických sociálních vědách. Epistemologické pole časopisu není striktně ohraničené a počítá s přesahy do civilizacionistiky, kulturní sociologie a dalších spřízněných oblastí.

Časopis vydává nakladatelství Univerzity Karlovy v Praze Karolinum ve spolupráci s Fakultou humanitních studií Univerzity Karlovy v Praze.

Historická sociologie je vědecký časopis s otevřeným přístupem, což znamená, že veškerý obsah je volně k dispozici bez poplatku pro uživatele nebo instituci. Uživatelé mohou číst, stahovat, kopírovat, distribuovat, tisknout, vyhledávat nebo odkazovat na plné texty článků v tomto časopise, aniž by potřebovali předchozí povolení od vydavatele nebo autora.

Recenzovaný vědecký časopis vychází dvakrát ročně, v červnu a v prosinci.

Časopis je abstraktován a indexován v CEEOL, CEJSH, DOAJ, EBSCO, Emerging Sources Citation Index, ERIH PLUS, OAJI, recensio.net, Scopus, SSOAR, Ulrichsweb.

Dlouhodobou archivaci elektronického obsahu časopisu zajišťuje Portico.

HISTORICKÁ SOCIOLOGIE, Vol 5 No 1 (2013), 9–32

Social History and Historical Sociology

Wolfgang Knöbl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363525.2014.27
zveřejněno: 23. 01. 2018

Abstract

This paper deals with exchanges and misunderstandings between the German school of social history (most prominently represented by scholars from the University of Bielefeld (such as Hans-Ulrich Wehler) and Anglo-American trends in historical sociology (exemplified by the works of Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol and Michael Mann). The social historians tended to dismiss historical sociology as too dependent on modernization theory, without taking into account the critique of that tradition by authors who brought processes of state formation and revolutionary change into the debate. On the other side, mainstream historical sociology worked with assumptions that limited its ability to change the terms and directions of sociological discourse, and to assimilate lessons from history. Among these inbuilt biases, organizational realism and materialism – particularly pronounced in the work of Michael Mann – stand out as particularly important. The paper closes with arguments in favour of bringing more history into historical sociology, with particular emphasis on three sets of problems. There is a need for more historical approaches to differentiation, less dependent on functionalist premises than the hitherto prevalent paradigm. A more explicit thematization of temporality in history and society would, among other things, help to clarify issues linked to the notion of path dependency. Finally, a reconsideration of the models and types of explanation in historical sociology would place more emphasis on their interpretive dimension.

Klíčová slova: historical sociology; social history; modernization theory; differentiation; path dependency; explanation

reference (123)

1. Abbott, Andrew. [1983]. Sequences of Social Events: Concepts and Methods for the Analysis of Order in Social Processes. Historical Methods 16 (4), pp. 129–147. CrossRef

2. Abbott, Andrew. [1984]. Event Sequence and Event Duration: colligation and Measurement. Historical Methods 17 (4), pp. 192–204. CrossRef

3. Abbott, Andrew. [1988]. The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

4. Abbott, Andrew. [1991]. History and Sociology: The Lost Synthesis. Social Science History 15 (2), pp. 201–238. CrossRef

5. Abbott, Andrew. [2002]. Time Matters. On Theory and Method. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

6. Abbott, Andrew. [2004]. Methods of Discovery. Heuristics for the Social Sciences. New York & London: W. W. Norton & Company.

7. Abbott, Andrew. [2006]. A Brief Note on Pasturization. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 47 (5), pp. 343–349. CrossRef

8. Adams, Julia – Clemens, Elisabeth S. – Orloff, Ann Shola (eds.). [2005]. Remaking Modernity. Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham & London: Duke Up.

9. Adams, Julia – Clemens, Elisabeth S. – Orloff, Ann Shola. [2005a]. Introduction: Social Theory, Modernity, and the Three Waves of Historical sociology. in. Adams, Julia – Clemens, Elisabeth S. – Orloff, Ann Shola. Remaking Modernity. Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham & London: Duke Up, pp. 1–72.

10. Agrama, Hussein Ali. [2010]. Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State? Comparative Studies in Society and History 52 (3), pp. 495–523. CrossRef

11. Amenta, Edwin. [2003]. What we know about the Development of Social Policy. Comparative and Histori cal Research in Comparative and Historical Perspective. in. Mahoney, James – Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 91–130. CrossRef

12. Asad, Talal. [2003]. Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford: Stanford Up.

13. Baldwin, Peter. [1990]. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State 1875–1975. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

14. Barkey, Karen. [2008]. Empire of Difference. The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

15. Bensel, Richard. [1990]. Yankee Leviathan. The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859–1877. Cambridge. Cambridge Up.

16. Biernacki, Richard. [2005]. The Action Turn? Comparative-Historical Inquiry beyond the Classical Models of Conduct. in. Adams, Julia – Clemens, Elisabeth S. – Orloff, Ann Shola. Remaking Modernity. Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham & London: Duke Up, pp. 75–91.

17. Blumer, Herbert. [1960]. Early Industrialization and the labouring class. Sociological Quarterly 1 (1), pp. 5–14. CrossRef

18. Blumer, Herbert. [1990 (1956)]. Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change. A Critical Analysis. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

19. Boltanski, luc. [1982]. Le Cadres. La formation d'un groupe social. Paris: Minuit.

20. Boltanski, luc. [2010]. Soziologie und Sozialkritik. Frankfurter Adorno-Vorlesungen 2008. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

21. Brubaker, Rogers. [1984]. The Limits of Rationality. An Essay on the Social and Moral Thought of Max Weber. London: Allen & Unwin.

22. Bühl, Walter l. [2003]. Historische Soziologie – Theoreme und Methoden. Münster, Hamburg, London: lit.

23. Burawoy, Michael. [1989]. Two Methods in Search of Science. Skocpol versus Trotsky. Theory and Society 18 (6), pp. 759–805. CrossRef

24. Calhoun, Craig. [1996]. The Rise and Domestication of Historical Sociology. In. Mcdonald, Terrence J. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 305–337.

25. Cassirer, Ernst. [2000 (1910)]. Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. gesammelte Werke – Hamburger ausgabe. Band 6. Hamburg: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

26. Centeno, Miguel a. [2002]. Blood and Debt. War and the Nation-State in Latin-America. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State Up.

27. Collier, Ruth Berins. [1999]. Paths Toward Democracy. The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. collins, randall. [1986]. Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

28. Daniel, Ute. [2010 (1993)]. ,Kultur' und ,Gesellschaft'. Überlegungen zum Gegenstandsbereich der Sozialgeschichte. in: Hitzer, Bettina – Welskopp, Thomas. Die Bielefelder Sozialgeschichte. Klassische Texte zu einem geschichtswissenschaftlichen Programm und seinen Kontroversen, Bielefeld: transcript, pp. 393–426.

29. Davis, Diane E. [2004]. Discipline and Development. Middle Classes and Prosperity in East Asia and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

30. Downing, Brian M. [1992]. The Military Revolution and Political Change. Origins of Democracy and Autocracy in Early Modern Europe. Princeton: Princeton Up.

31. Ertman, Thomas. [1997]. Birth of the Leviathan. Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

32. Esping-Andersen, Gosta. [1990]. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton Up.

33. Evans, Peter. [1995]. Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton Up.

34. Evans, Peter – Rueschemeyer, Dietrich – Skocpol, Theda (eds.) [1985]. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge Up.

35. Frevert, Ute. [1995 (1991)]. Men of Honour: A Social and Cultural History of the Duel. London: Polity Press.

36. Giddens, Anthony. [1984]. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

37. Giddens, Anthony. [1985]. The Nation-State and Violence. Volume Two of A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

38. Goldstone, Jack A. [1991]. Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley/Los Angeles/ London: University of California Press.

39. Goldstone, Jack A. [2003]. Comparative Historical Analysis and Knowledge Accumulation in the Study of Revolutions. in. Mahoney, James – Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 41–90. CrossRef

40. Goodwin, Jeff. [2001]. No Other Way Out. States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945–1991. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

41. Gorski, Philip S. [2003]. The Disciplinary Revolution. Calvinism and the Rise of the State in Early Modern Europe. Chicago und London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

42. Gorski, Philip S. [2006]. Mann's theory of ideological power: sources, applications and elaborations. in. Hall, John A. – Schroeder, Ralph. An Anatomy of Power. The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 101–134.

43. Gourevitch, Peter. [1986]. Politics in Hard Times. Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. ithaca & London: cornell Up.

44. Grießinger, Andreas. [1981]. Das symbolische Kapital der Ehre. Streikbewegungen und kollektives Bewusstsein deutscher Handwerksgesellen im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt/Main et al.: Ullstein.

45. Hall, John A. [1985]. Powers and Liberties. The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. London: Penguin.

46. Hall, John A. [1989]. They do things differently there, or, the contribution of British Historical sociology. British Journal of Sociology 40 (4), pp. 544–564. CrossRef

47. Hall, Peter A. [1986]. Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford Up.

48. Hicks. Alexander. [1999]. Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. A Century of Income Security Politics. Ithaca & London: Cornell Up.

49. Honneth, Axel. [1995 (1992)]. The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. transl. by Joel anderson. Cambridge: Polity Press.

50. Hunt, lynn. [1984]. Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

51. Ikegami, Eiko. [1995]. The Taming of the Samurai. Honorific Individualism and the Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge & London: Harvard Up.

52. Joas, Hans. [1996 (1992)]. The Creativity of Action. Translated by Jeremy Gaines and Paul Keast. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

53. Joas, Hans. [2003]. The Modernity of War: Modernization Theory and the Problem of Violence. in. Joas, Hans, War and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity, pp. 43–54.

54. <bez popisu>

55. Keil, Hartmut. [2000]. Handeln und Verursachen. Frankfurt/Main: Klostermann.

56. Kaelble, Hartmut – Jürgen Schriewer (eds.) [2003]. Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt/Main & New York: Campus.

57. Kocka, Jürgen. [1972]. Otto Hintze. in. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Deutsche Historiker. Band III. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 41–64.

58. Kocka, Jürgen. [1981]. Otto Hintze, Max Weber und das problem der Bürokratie. Historische Zeitschrift 233, pp. 65–105. CrossRef

59. Kocka, Jürgen. [2002]. Sozialgeschichte in Deutschland seit 1945. Aufstieg – Krise – Perspektiven. Vortrag auf der Festveranstaltung zum 40-jährigen Bestehen des Instituts für Sozialgeschichte am 25. Oktober 2002 in Braunschweig. Bonn: Friedrich-ebert-stiftung. Historisches Forschungszentrum.

60. Kohli, Atul. [1987]. The state and poverty in India. The politics of reform. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

61. Laak, Dirk van. [2001]. Infra-strukturgeschichte. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 27 (3), pp. 367–393.

62. Laak, Dirk van. [2004]. Imperiale Infrastruktur. Deutsche Planungen für eine Erschließung Afrikas 1880–1960. Paderborn et al.: F. Schöningh.

63. Laak, Dirk van. [2008]. Planung. Geschichte und Gegenwart des Vorgriffs auf die Zukunft. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 34 (3), pp. 305–326. CrossRef

64. Lamont, Michèle. [1992]. Money, Morals & Manner. The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

65. Lange, Matthew. [2009]. Despotism and Development. British Colonialism and State Power. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

66. Lange, Matthew – Rueschemeyer, Dietrich (eds.) [2005]. States and Development. Historical Antecedents of Stagnation and Advance. Basingstoke: Palgrave/Macmillan.

67. Lenger, Friedrich. [2010]., Historische sozialwissenschaft': Aufbruch oder Sackgasse. In. Cornelißen, Christoph. Geschichtswissenschaft im Geist der Demokratie. Wolfgang J. Mommsen und seine Generation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 115–132. CrossRef

68. Lorenz, Chris. [2004]. Wozu noch Theorie der Geschichte? Über das ambivalente Verhältnis zwischen Gesellschaftsgeschichte und Modernisierungstheorie. In. Lorenz, Chris, Wozu Geschichte? Geschichtswissenschaft und Geschichtsphilosophie im Widerstreit. Stuttgart: Steiner, pp. 117–143.

69. Luhmann, Niklas. [1991]. Soziologische Aufklärung. in. Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossRef

70. Mahoney, James. [2001]. The Legacies of Liberalism. Path Dependence and Political Regimes in Central America. Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins Up.

71. Mahoney, James. [2010]. Colonialism and Postcolonial Development. Spanish America in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

72. Mann, Michael. [2006]. The sources of social power revisited: a response to criticism. in. Hall, John a. – schroeder, ralph. An Anatomy of Power. The Social Theory of Michael Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 343–396.

73. Mann, Michael. [1986; 1993; 2012]. The Sources of Social Power. 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge Up.

74. Mayntz, Renate. [2009]. Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären. Probleme einer Theoriebildung und Methodologie. Frankfurt/Main & New York: Campus.

75. Moore, Barrington, Jr. [1966]. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.

76. Moore, Barrington, Jr. [1978]. Injustice. The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. London & Basingstoke: Macmillan.

77. Moore, Barrington, Jr. [1984]. Privacy. Studies in Social and Cultural History. Armonk & London: M. E. Sharpe.

78. Orloff, Ann Shola. [1993]. The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

79. Osterhammel, Jürgen. [2006]. Gesellschaftsgeschichte und Historische Soziologie. in. Osterhammel, Jürgen – Langewiesche, Dieter – Nolte, Paul. Wege der Gesellschaftsgeschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 81–102.

80. Page, Edward C. [1990]. The Political Origins of Self-government and Bureaucracy: Otto Hintze's Conceptual Map of Europe. Political Studies 38 (1), pp. 39–55. CrossRef

81. Paige, Jeffrey M. [1997]. Coffee and Power. Revolution and the Rise of Democracy in Central America. Cambridge, Mass. & London: Harvard Up.

82. Parsa, Misagh. [2000]. States, Ideologies, and Social Revolutions. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

83. Pierson, Paul [1994]. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

84. Ragin, Charles C. [1987]. The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.

85. Ragin, Charles. [2000]. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.

86. Roth, Guenther. [1989]. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der historischen Soziologie. Weiß, Johannes. Max Weber heute: Erträge und Probleme der Forschung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 406–424.

87. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich. [2009]. Usable Theory. Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton Up.

88. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich – Huber Stephens, Evelyne – Stephens, John D. (eds.) [1992]. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

89. Schwinn, Thomas. [2001]. Differenzierung ohne Gesellschaft. Umstellung eines soziologischen Konzepts. Velbrück: Velbrück Wissenschaft.

90. Sewell, William H., Jr. [1994]. Ideologies and social revolutions: reflections on the French case. in. Skocpol, Theda. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 169–198. CrossRef

91. Sewell, William H., Jr. [2005]. Logics of History. Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

92. Sheehan, James J. [1980]. Barrington Moore on obedience and revolt. Theory and Society 9 (5), pp. 723–734. CrossRef

93. Skocpol, Theda. [1979]. States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia & China. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. CrossRef

94. Skocpol, Theda. [1987]. Social History and Historical Sociology: Contrasts and Complementarities. Social Science History 11 (1), pp. 17–30. CrossRef

95. Skocpol, Theda. [1992]. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press.

96. Skocpol, Theda. [1994a]. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge Up.

97. Skocpol, Theda. [1994b]. A Critical review of Barrington Moore's Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. in. Skocpol, Theda. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 25–54.

98. Skocpol, Theda. [1994c]. Cultural idioms and political ideologies in the revolutionary reconstruction of state power: a rejoinder to Sewell. In. Skocpol, Theda. Social Revolutions in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge Up, pp. 199–209.

99. Skowronek, Stephen. [1982]. Building a New American State. The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge Up. soifer, Hillel. [2008]. state infrastructural power: approaches to conceptualization and Measurement. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3/4), pp. 231–251.

100. Soifer, Hillel – Hau, Matthias vom. [2008]. Unpacking the Strength of the state: The Utility of state infrastructural power. Studies in Comparative International Development 43 (3/4), pp. 219–230.

101. Spohn, Willfried. [1989]. Zum methodologischen Verhältnis von Sozialgeschichte, historischer Soziologie und Geschichtsphilosophie am Beispiel einiger jüngerer Interpretationsansätze der Klassenformierung der Arbeiterschaft. Archiv für Kulturgeschichte 71 (2), pp. 487–501.

102. Starrett, Gregory. [2010]. The Varieties of Secular Experience. Comparative Studies in Society and History 52 (3), pp. 626–651. CrossRef

103. steinmetz, george (ed.) [1999]. State/Culture. State-Formation after the Cultural Turn. ithaca & London: cornell Up.

104. Steinmetz, George. [2005]. The Epistemological Unconsciousness of U.S. Sociology and the Transition to post-Fordism: The case of Historical Sociology. In. Adams, Julia – Clemens, Elisabeth S. – Orloff, Ann Shola. Remaking Modernity. Politics, History, and Sociology. Durham & London: Duke Up, pp. 109–157

105. Tenbruck, Friedrich. [1981]. Emile Durkheim oder die Geburt der Gesellschaft aus dem Geiste der Soziologie. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 10, pp. 333–350. CrossRef

106. Tenbruck, Friedrich. [1994]. Internal History of Society or Universal History? Theory, Culture & Society 11 (1), pp. 75–93. CrossRef

107. Tenfelde, Klaus. [1980]. German Workers and the incapacity for revolution. Theory and Society 9 (5), pp. 735–744. CrossRef

108. Terpe, Sylvia. [2009]. Ungerechtigkeit und Duldung. Die Deutung sozialer Ungleichheit und das Ausbleiben von Protest. konstanz: Uvk.

109. Tilly, Charles. [1986]. The Contentious French. Four Centuries of Popular Struggle. Cambridge, Mass. & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard Up. CrossRef

110. Tilly, Charles. [1990]. Coercion, Capital, and European States, A.D. 990–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge Up.

111. Tilly, Charles. [1978]. From Mobilization to Revolution. New York et al.: Mcgraw-Hill.

112. Tilly, Charles – Tilly, Louise – Tilly, Richard. [1975]. The Rebellious Century 1830–1930. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Up.

113. Touraine, Alain. [1981]. Une sociologie sans société. Revue française de Sociologie 22 (1), pp. 3–13. CrossRef

114. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. [1975]. Modernisierungstheorie und Geschichte. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

115. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. [1985 (1973)]. The German Empire, 1871–1918. Oxford & New York: Berg Publishers.

116. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. [2000]. Modernisierung und Modernisierungstheorien. in. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. Umbruch und Kontinuität. Essays zum 20. Jahrhundert. München: C. H. Beck, pp. 214–250.

117. Wehler, Hans-Ulrich. [2010 (1988)]. Historische sozialwissenschaft. eine Zwischenbilanz nach dreißig Jahren. in. Hitzer, Bettina – Welskopp, Thomas. Die Bielefelder Sozialgeschichte. Klassische Texte zu einem geschichtswissenschaftlichen Programm und seinen Kontroversen. Bielefeld: transcript, pp. 433–441.

118. Weiss, linda [1998]. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca & New York: Cornell Up.

119. Welskopp, Thomas. [1998]. Die Sozialgeschichte der Väter. Grenzen und Perspektiven der Historischen Sozialwissenschaft. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 24, pp. 173–198.

120. Welskopp, Thomas.[1999]. Westbindung auf dem ,sonderweg'. Die deutsche Sozialgeschichte vom Appendix der Wirtschaftsgeschichte zur Historischen Sozialwissenschaft. In. Küttler, Wolfgang – Rüsen, Jörn – Schulin, Ernst. Geschichtsdiskurs. Band 5: Globale Konflikte, Erinnerungsarbeit und Neuorientierungen seit 1945, Frankfurt/Main: Fischer, pp. 191–237.

121. Wirtz, Rainer. [1981]. ,Widersetzlichkeiten, Excesse, Crawalle, Tumulte und Skandale'. Soziale Bewegung und gewalthafter sozialer Protest in Baden 1815–1848. Frankfurt/Main et al.: Ullstein.

122. Zelizer, Viviana A. [1994]. The Social Meaning of Money. New York: Basic Books.

123. Ziemann, Benjamin.[2003]. Sozialgeschichte jenseits des Produktionsparadigmas. Überlegungen zu Geschichte und Perspektive eines Forschungsfeldes. Mitteilungsblatt des Instituts für soziale Bewegungen 28, pp. 5–35.

Creative Commons License
Social History and Historical Sociology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 120 Kč
ISSN: 1804-0616
E-ISSN: 2336-3525

Ke stažení