Is It Still Too Early to Tell? Rethinking Sociology’s Relations to the French Revolution

It seems almost impossible today to deny the importance of the French Revolution in creating both the distinctively modern social world and sociology’s characteristic responses to it. This paper takes issue with various of the standard narrations of these matters. It aims at developing fresh thinking about what the Revolution was, and what roles it may, or may not have, played in generating subsequent social phenomena and the sociology tasked with comprehending them. The claim by Robert Nisbet that the roots of sociology especially lie in Conservative responses to the Revolution are critically assessed. The potential importance of Durkheim and de Tocqueville for creating new narrations of the connections between the Revolution and sociology are considered. The manners in which the Revolution has been invoked to construct concepts of “modernity” and dramatic historical breaks with the past are reflected upon.

1. Arendt, Hannah [1973]. On Revolution. London: Pelican.

2. Arnason, Johann P. [1989]. The Imaginary Constitution of Modernity. Revue Europeenne des Sciences Sociales 27: 323−37.

3. Aron, Raymond [1965]. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. London: Pelican.

4. Baehr, Peter [2002]. Founders, Classics, Canons. New Brunswick: Transaction.

5. Berlin, Isaiah [2000]. The Roots of Romanticism. London: Pimlico.

6. Censer, Jack – Hunt, Lynn [2005]. Imaging the French Revolution. American Historical Review 110: 38–45.

7. De Tocqueville, Alexis [2008 (1856)]. The Ancien Regime and the Revolution. London: Penguin.

8. Dubois, Laurent [2000]. La Republique Metissee: Citizenship, Colonialism and the Borders of French History. Cultural Studies 14: 15–34. CrossRef

9. Durkheim, Emile [2001 (1912)]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

10. Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. [2004]. The Civilizational Dimension of Modernity: Modernity as a Distinct Civilization. In. Arjomand, Said – Tiryakian, Edward A. (eds.). Rethinking Civilizational Analysis. London: Sage.

11. Engels, Friedrich [1959]. Anti-Duhring. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.

12. Engels, Friedrich [1968]. Socialism, Utopian and Scientific. In. Marx / Engels: Selected Works. London: Lawrence and Wishart.

13. Evans, Mary [2006]. A Short History of Society. London: McGraw Hill.

14. Fukuyama, Francis [1992]. The End of History and the Last Man. London: Hamish Hamilton.

15. Furet, Francois [1981]. Interpreting the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16. Furet, Francois [1988]. Marx and the French Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17. Giddens, Anthony [1976]. Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 81: 703–729. CrossRef

18. Go, Julian [2013]. For a Postcolonial Sociology. Theory and Society 42: 25–55. CrossRef

19. Goldberg, Chad Alan [2011]. The Jews, the Revolution, and the Old Regime in French Anti-Semitism and Durkheim's Sociology. Sociological Theory 29: 248–271. CrossRef

20. Goldhammer, Jesse [2005]. The Headless Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

21. Harison, Casey [2002]. Teaching the French Revolution. The History Teacher 35: 137–162. CrossRef

22. Hawthorn, Geoffrey [1976]. Enlightenment and Despair. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23. Heilbron, Johan [1995]. The Rise of Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

24. Himmelstein, Jerome L. [1981] Review: The Two Nisbets: The Ambivalence of Contemporary Conservatism. Social Forces 60: 231–236. CrossRef

25. Inglis, David [2015]. Co je dnes v sociologii obhajitelne? Prezentismus, historicka vize a proč je sociologie užitečna. Historical Sociology 1: 20–24.

26. Kouvelakis, Stathis [2003]. Philosophy and Revolution: From Kant to Marx. London: Verso.

27. Krause, Alison [2016]. "Western Hegemony" in the Social Sciences: Fields and Model Systems. Sociological Review Monograph Series 64: 194–211.

28. Krejči, Jaroslav [2004] The Paths of Civilization: Understanding the Currents of History. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

29. Kumar, Krishan [1986]. Prophecy and Progress. London: Pelican.

30. Latour, Bruno [1993]. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

31. Levine, Donald N. [1995]. Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

32. MacVarish, Kathryn [2005]. Illusions of Revolution: Francois Furet's Critique of Marx. History of European Ideas 31: 491–508. CrossRef

33. Marcuse, Herbert [1963]. Reason and Revolution. London: Routledge.

34. Martindale, Don [1967]. The Nature and Types of Sociological Theory. London: Routledge.

35. Mazlish, Bruce [1989]. A New Science: The Breakdown of Connections and the Birth of Sociology. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.

36. Netter, Marie-Laurence [2003]. Raymond Aron and the French Revolution. European Journal of Political Theory 2: 373–382. CrossRef

37. Nisbet, Robert [1943]. The French Revolution and the Rise of Sociology in France. American Journal of Sociology 49: 136–164. CrossRef

38. Nisbet, Robert [1952]. Conservatism and Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 58: 167–175. CrossRef

39. Nisbet, Robert [1974]. The Social Philosophers. London: Paladin.

40. Nisbet, Robert [1980]. The Sociological Tradition. London: Heinemann.

41. Sewell, William F. [1999]. Three Temporalities: Toward an Eventful Sociology. In. McDonald, Terence J. (ed.). The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.

42. Toynbee, Arnold J. [1967]. A Study of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

43. Wallerstein, Immanuel [1987]. World-Systems Analysis. In. Giddens, Anthony – Turner, Jonathan (eds.). Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity.

44. Wood, Ellen Meiksins [1999]. The Origin of Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.