Sailing across the North Sea: the development of trust in a short-term high intensity environment

Interpersonal trust among team members is an important phenomenon influencing working relationships and performance outcomes. However, there is a lack of empirical studies investigating the development of trust with respect to behavioural and environmental factors in a group of strangers. This exploratory, mixed method study investigated the development of two-dimensional interpersonal trust (affective and cognitive) and team cohesion in a newly formed temporary team of novice adults during a seven-day sail training programme. A descriptive longitudinal case study approach was adopted in the current study. Seven crew members completed the standardised psychometric questionnaires and were interviewed during the voyage. Results suggested that the development of trust occurs over three phases; 1) initial perception of shared identity, 2) early trust and 3) two dimensional trust comprising cognitive and affective dimensions. Distinct antecedents for the development of trust at each stage were identified and the importance of the competence-oriented subcomponent of cognitive trust within this challenging environmental context was highlighted. Exploratory interpretation suggests some overlap in the antecedents of interpersonal trust and team cohesion. However, further longitudinal research must examine this relationship and establish corroborative evidence for the model of trust. This research can impact on practitioners leading programmes to better understand how trust can develop over time, and offers a pragmatic approach to investigations in real world contexts.

1. Aubert, B. A., & Kelsey, B. (2003). Further understanding of trust and performance in virtual teams. Small Group Research, 34(5), 575–618. CrossRef

2. Barker, J. B., & Jones, M. V. (2006). Using hypnosis, technique refinement and self-modeling to enhance self-efficacy: A case study in cricket. The Sport Psychologist, 20, 94–110. CrossRef

3. Bhattacharya, R., Devinney, T. M., & Pillutla, M. M. (1998). A formal model of trust based on outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 23, 459–472. CrossRef

4. Brahm, T., & Kunze, F. (2011). How to increase the performance of virtual teams – A moderated-mediation model of goal setting, task cohesion and trust. In: Decent Work and Beyond – W&O Psychologists' Contribution to Society. Maastricht: EAWOP.

5. Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 270–283. CrossRef

6. Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport team: The group environment questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244–266. CrossRef

7. Costa, A. C., Roe, R. A., & Taillieu, T. (2001). Trust within teams: The relation with performance effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(3), 225–244. CrossRef

8. Dirsk, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004–1012. CrossRef

9. Donnelly, P., & Young, K. (1988). The construction and confirmation of identity in sport subcultures. Sociology of Sport Journal, 5(3), 223–240. CrossRef

10. Dunn, J. G. H., & Holt, N. L. (2004). A qualitative investigation of a personal-disclosure mutual-sharing team building activity. The Sport Psychologist, 18(4), 363–380. CrossRef

11. Erdem, F., & Ozen, J. (2003). Cognitive and affective dimensions of trust in developing team performance. Team Performance Management, 9(5/6), 131–135. CrossRef

12. Evans, A. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2014). Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust. Judgement and Decision Making, 9(2), 90–103.

13. Fung, H. P. (2014). Relationships among team trust, team cohesion, team satisfaction and project team effectiveness as perceived by project managers in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 1(1), 1–15.

14. Giacobbi, P. R., Poczwardowski, A., & Hager, P. (2005). A pragmatic research philosophy for applied sport psychology. The Sport Psychologist, 19(1), 18–31. CrossRef

15. Glass, J. S., & Benshoff, J. M. (2002). Facilitating group cohesion among adolescents though challenge course experiences. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 268–277. CrossRef

16. Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36(3), 217–223. CrossRef

17. Hackett, G. M. A. (2014). Examining the relationships between trust in athlete leadership and cohesion (Doctoral thesis, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada).

18. Hansen, M. H., Morrow Jr., J. L., & Batista, J. C. (2002). The impact of trust on cooperative membership retention, performance, and satisfaction: An exploratory study. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 5(4), 41–59. CrossRef

19. Hodge, S. R., Ammah, J. O. A., Casebolt, K., Lamaster, K., & O'Sullivan, M. (2004). High school general physical education teachers' behaviors and beliefs associated with inclusion. Sport, Education and Society, 9(3), 395–419. CrossRef

20. Hong, L. K., & Duff, R. (2002). Modulated participant-observation: Managing the dilemma of distance in field research. Field Methods, 14(2), 190–196. CrossRef

21. Jirasek, I., & Dvorackova, A. (2016). The development of group connectedness and sense of community during a twelve-day winter journey on showshoes: Non-formal education through the Czech Outward Bound course. IDO MOVEMENT FOR CULTURE. Journal of Martial Arts Anthropology, 16(1), 39–48.

22. Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 311(5), 376–380. CrossRef

23. Julien, H. (2008). Content analysis. In: L. M. Given (Ed.), SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 1&2, pp. 120–122). Los Angeles, USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

24. Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2010). Single-case designs technical documentation. Retrieved June 9 2014 from What Works Clearinghouse website: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED510743.pdf.

25. Lau, D. C., & Liden, R. C. (2008). Antecedents of coworkers trust: Leaders' blessings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1130–1138. CrossRef

26. Lusher, D., Kremer, P., & Robins, G. (2014). Cooperative and competitive structures of trust relations in teams. Small Group Research, 45(1), 3–36. CrossRef

27. Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 771–794. CrossRef

28. Mahoney, M. J., & Avener, M. (1977). Psychology of the elite athlete: An exploratory study. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(2), 135–141. CrossRef

29. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. CrossRef

30. McAllister, D. J. (1995). Foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. CrossRef

31. Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In: R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc. CrossRef

32. Mooney, A. C., Holahan, P., & Amason, A. C. (2007). Don't take it personally: Exploring cognitive conflict as a mediator of affective conflict. Journal of Management Studies, 44(5), 733–758. CrossRef

33. Ocean Youth Trust South (2006). About the boat. Retrieved from http://www.oytsouth.org/about-our-boat.asp.

34. Pain, M., & Harwood, C. (2009). Team building through mutual sharing and open discussion of team functioning. The Sport Psychologist, 23(4), 523–542. CrossRef

35. Pratt, M. G. (2009). From the Editors: For the lack of a boilerplate: Tips on writing up (and reviewing) qualitative research. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 856–862. CrossRef

36. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research project. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.

37. Shooter, W., Sibthorp, J., & Gookin, J. (2010). The importance of trust in outdoor education: Exploring the relationship between trust in outdoor leaders and developmental outcomes. Research in Outdoor Education, 10, 48–56.

38. Sibthorp, J., & Jostad, J. (2014). The social system in outdoor adventure education programs. Journal of Experiential Education, 37(1), 60–74. CrossRef

39. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications.

40. Von Wald, K., & Allison, P. (2011). Sail training programme evaluation: Self-assessment toolkit. (2nd ed.). Gosport: Sail Training International.

41. Webber, S. S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams: A longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 39(6), 746–769. CrossRef

42. Woodcock, C., Richards, H., & Mugford, A. (2008). Quality counts: Critical features for neophyte professional development. The Sport Psychologist, 22(4), 491–506. CrossRef

43. Zhang, Z. (2004). Trust in leadership in sport: Its antecedents and its consequences (Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University, USA).