Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica (AUC Kinanthropologica) is an international peer reviewed journal for the publication of research outcomes in the humanities, the social sciences and the natural sciences, as applied to kinathropology. It is a multidisciplinary journal accepting only original unpublished articles in English in the various sub-disciplines and related fields of kinanthropology, such as Anthropology, Anthropomotorics, Sports Pedagogy, Sociology of Sport, Philosophy of Sport, History of Sport, Physiology of Sport And Exercise, Physical Education, Applied Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Human Biomechanics, Psychology of Sport, Sports Training and Coaching, Sport Management, etc. The journal also welcomes interdisciplinary articles. The journal also includes reports of relevant activities and reviews of relevant publications.
The journal is abstracted and indexed by CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, SPOLIT, SPORTDiscus, and Ulrichsweb.
AUC KINANTHROPOLOGICA, Vol 49 No 1 (2013), 5–16
The Normality of EU Sport Policy Studies: Disciplinary Locus in Political Science, Sport Science or Elsewhere?
Jacob Kornbeck
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366052.2014.8
zveřejněno: 23. 05. 2014
Abstract
The Normality of EU Sport Policy Studies: Disciplinary Locus in Political Science, Sport Science or Elsewhere? Mainstream European integration research has shown that research on the EU tends to follow the conjunctures of European integration itself. This realisation has led to some debate on which branch of political science – international relations or government – or indeed other academic disciplines is/are the most appropriate locus for such research. The paper takes these debates one step further by looking at the occurrence of ‘EU & sport’ studies within the wider field of EU studies. The main material used comes from the ECLAS database. Findings lead to a discussion of whether ‘EU & sport’ studies should rather be for EU specialists or for sport specialists and a plea for disciplinary normalisation whereby sport science would need to get more directly involved (without necessarily overwriting political science). Some ideas are added regarding the need for a mapping of Central & Eastern European scholarship. Normalita politických studií EU v oblasti sportu: místo v oborech politologie, sportovních vědách či jinde? Hlavní integrační proudy v evropském výzkumu dokumentují, že výzkum v EU má tendenci zkoumat evropskou integraci jako takovou. Toto poznání vedlo k diskusi, v kterém oboru politologie – mezinárodní vztahy či vláda – nebo i v jiných akademických disciplínách je nejvhodnější místo pro takový výzkum. Stať se pokouší posunout tyto diskuse o krok dále tím, že studie o „EU a sportu“ se posuzují v širším záběru EU studií. Hlavní informační zdroje pocházejí z databáze ECLAS. Naše zjištění vedou k diskusi o problematice „EU a sportu“ v tom smyslu, zda by tyto studie měly být spíše určeny odborníkům EU, nebo sportovním specialistům. Důležitá je otázka disciplinární začlenění této problematiky, s širším zapojením sportovních věd (aniž by se nutně přepisovaly politické vědy). Některé přidané myšlenky se týkají potřeb stipendií pro země Střední a Východní Evropy.
klíčová slova: European Union; European integration; EU studies; sport policy; sport science; research agenda Evropská unie; Evropská integrace; studie EU ve sportovní politice; sportovní vědy; výzkumné programy
reference (29)
1. Andrews, D. M. (2012). The rise and fall of EU studies in the USA. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 755–775. CrossRef
2. BBC (2013). West Germany 'sponsored doping in sports' study. 5 August 2013. Last updated at 14:12 GMT. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-23573169
3. Bickerton, C. J. (2013). European Integration: from nation-states to member states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.
5. Coopers & Lybrand (1994). The Impact of EC Activities on Sport. Brussels: Coopers & Lybrand.
6. Cottrell, M. P. & Nelson, T. (2011). Not just the Games?: Power, protest and politics at the Olympics. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 729–753. CrossRef
7. Coudenhove-Kalergi, R. (1926). Pan-Europe. NYC: Knopf.
8. Dennis, M. & Grix, J. (2012). Sport under Communism: Behind the East German 'miracle'. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef
9. Gabel, M., Hix, S. & Schneider, G. (2002). Who Is Afraid of Cumulative Research?: Improving Data on EU Politics. European Union Politics, 3(4), 481–500. CrossRef
10. García, B. & Meier, H. E. (2012). Limits of Interest Empowerment in the European Union: the case of football. Journal of European Integration, 34(4), 359–378. CrossRef
11. García, B. & Weatherill, S. (2012). Engaging with the EU in order to minimize its impact: sport and the negotiation of the Treaty of Lisbon. Journal of European Public Policy, 19, (2), 238–256. CrossRef
12. Haas, E. B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford UP.
13. Hix, S. (1998). The Study of the European Union II: The 'New Governance' Agenda and its Rival. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 38–65. CrossRef
14. Ilešič, M. (2010). The Development of the Law and the Practice in the Post-Bosman Era. In: Poiares Maduro, M. P. & Azoulai, L. (eds) The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty 2010. Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 477–479.
15. Kauppia, N. (2010). The Political Ontology of European Integration. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 19–36. CrossRef
16. Keeler, J. T. (2005). Mapping EU Studies: the evolution from boutique to boom field 1960–2001. Common Market Law Review, 43(3), 551–582. CrossRef
17. Kornbeck, J. (2012). Die Henne, das Ei, die Integration und die Integrationsforschung. Ein Beitrag zur Grundlegung einer EU-Sportpolitikwissenschaft". Cork: University College Cork, College of Arts, Celtic Studies and Social Sciences (William Thompson Working Papers; 25), http://www.ucc.ie/en/socialpolicy/williamthompsonworkingpapers/WT_WP-25_Kornbeck_henne.pdf.
18. Kreppel, A. (2012). The normalization of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 635–645. CrossRef
19. Lösche, P. (2010). Sportpolity, Sportpolitics und Sportpolicy als theoretische Annäherung an eine Sportpolitikwissenschaft. In: Tokarski, W. & Petry, K. (eds) Handbuch Sportpolitik. Schorndorf: Hofmann, 11–28.
20. Makins, C. J. (1998). The Study of Europe in the United States. Washington, DC: European Commission & German Marshall Fund of the United States. PubMed
21. Mittag, J. & Groll, M. (2010). Theoretische Ansätze zur Analyse europäischer und transnationaler Sportpolitik und Sportstrukturen. In: Tokarski, W. & Petry, K. (eds) Handbuch Sportpolitik. Schorndorf: Hofmann, 29–46.
22. Mitrany, D. (1958). The Progress of International Government. London: George Allen & Unwin.
23. Parrish, R. (2003). Sports Law and the European Union. Manchester & New York: Manchester University Press. CrossRef
24. Parrish, R. (2012). Lex Sportiva and EU Sports Law. European Law Review, 37(6), 716–733.
25. Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
26. Ryall, E. (2011). The notion of a science of sport: some conceptual considerations. In: Schulz, H., Wright, P. R. & Hauser, T. (eds) Exercise, Sports and Health. Chemnitz: Chemnitz University of Technology, 171–176.
27. Tokarski, W., Petry, K., Groll, M. & Mittag, J. (2009). A Perfect Match? Sport and the European Union. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.
28. Van den Bogaert, S. (2010). Bosman: The Genesis of European Sports Law. The Past and Future of EU Law. In: Poiares Maduro, M. P. & Azoulai, L. (eds) The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty 2010. Oxford & Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 488–497.
29. Woll, C. & Jacquot, S. (2010). Using Europe: Strategic action in multi-level Politics. Comparative European Politics, 8(1), 110–126. CrossRef
157 x 230 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 190 Kč
ISSN: 1212-1428
E-ISSN: 2336-6052
