Shadow Education in Uzbekistan: Teachers’ Perceptions of Private Tutoring in the Context of Academic Lyceums

Private tutoring is a globally widespread phenomenon which can be associated with marketization and privatization. After the breakdown of the Soviet Union, the transition to a free-market economy in Uzbekistan facilitated the rise of informal private sector in public education. This in turn has affected mainstream schooling in many ways and changed the face of education. Considering socio-economic transformations in the country, the theory of hidden privatisation by Ball and Youdell (2007) is employed to analyse different facets of informal privatization in the form of shadow education. Drawing on 24 face-to-face interviews with teachers, (vice) principals and students and student questionnaires, this article examines the nature and scale of private tutoring as well as teachers’ perspectives on the influence of tutoring on teaching and learning process. The findings demonstrated that teachers’ overall attitudes towards private tutoring were positive and teachers mostly considered tutoring as an indispensable part of teaching and learning process. The most significant finding was that the scale of tutoring was exceptionally high (95%) in academic lyceums. The pervasiveness of the phenomenon is associated with entrance examinations, which increased the dependency of teachers and students on tutoring. The article concludes by elucidating how the emergence of shadow education in academic lyceums resulted in the change of the nature of mainstream schooling and the transformation of teacher identities.

1. Altinyelken, H. K. (2013). The demand for private tutoring in Turkey: Unintended consequences of curriculum reform. In M. Bray, A. E. Mazawi, & R. G. Sultana (Eds.), Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity (pp. 187-204). Sense Publishers. CrossRef

2. Bagdasarova, N., & Ivanov, A. (2009). Private tutoring in Kyrgyzstan. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia: New opportunities and burdens (pp. 119-142). IIEP-UNESCO.

3. Baker, D. P., & Le Tendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: world culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University Press.

4. Ball, S. J., & Youdell, D. (2007). Hidden privatisation in public education. Education International. CrossRef

5. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: private tutoring and its implications for planners [Fundamentals of Educational Planning No. 61]. IIEP-UNESCO.

6. Bray, M. (2003). Adverse effects of private supplementary tutoring: Dimensions, implications and government responses. UNESCO.

7. Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare, 36(4), 515-530. CrossRef

8. Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? IIEP-UNESCO.

9. Bray, M. (2011). The challenge of shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union. European Commission.

10. Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014). The global spread of shadow education: Supporting or undermining qualities of education? In D. B. Napier (Ed.), Qualities of education in a globalized world (pp. 185-200). Sense Publishers. CrossRef

11. Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2015). Evolving ecosystems in education: The nature and implications of private supplementary tutoring in Hong Kong. Prospects, 45, 465-481. CrossRef

12. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC), The University of Hong Kong.

13. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2015). Designing and implementing mixed approaches to shadow education research: Experiences and lessons in Hong Kong. In M. Bray, O. Kwo, & B. Jokić (Eds.), Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures (pp. 149-178). The University of Hong Kong and Springer. CrossRef

14. Bray, M., Kwo, O., & Jokić, B. (2015). Introduction. In M. Bray, O. Kwo, & B. Jokić (Eds.), Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures (pp. 3-19). Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC), The University of Hong Kong and Springer.

15. Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: conceptual considerations, and socio-economic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review 22, 611-620. CrossRef

16. Bray, M., & Silova, I. (2006). The private tutoring phenomenon: International patterns and perspectives. In I. Silova, V. Būdiene, & M. Bray (Eds.), Education in a hidden marketplace: monitoring of private tutoring (pp. 27-40). Open Society Institute.

17. Brehm, W. C., & Silova, I. (2014). Hidden privatization of public education in Cambodia: Equity implications of private tutoring. Journal for Educational Research Online, 6(1), 94-116.

18. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed). Taylor & Francis, Routledge.

19. Dawson, W. (2009). The tricks of the teacher: Shadow education and corruption in Cambodia. In S. P. Heyneman (Ed.), Buying your way into heaven: Education and corruption in international perspective (pp. 51-74). Sense Publishers. CrossRef

20. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea, and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 14-24. CrossRef

21. Foondun, R. A. (2002). The issue of private tuition: An analysis of the practice in Mauritius and selected South-East Asian countries. International Review of Education, 48(6), 485-515. CrossRef

22. Hays, J. (2008). Education in Uzbekistan. Retrieved September 9, 2020, from http://factsanddetails.com/central-asia/Uzbekistan/sub8_3f/entry-4733.html

23. Ireson, J. (2004). Private tutoring: How prevalent and effective is it? London Review of Education, 2(2), 109-122. CrossRef

24. Kalikova, S., & Rakhimzhanova, Z. (2009). Private tutoring in Kazakhstan. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 93-118). IIEP-UNESCO.

25. Kazimzade, E., & Lepisto, E. (Eds.) (2010). Drawing the line: Parental informal payments for education across Euro-Asia. Open Society Institute.

26. Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014). Corruption risks of private tutoring: Case of Georgia, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 455-475. CrossRef

27. Kobakhidze, M. (2018). Teachers as tutors: Shadow education market dynamics in Georgia. The University of Hong Kong, CERC and Springer. CrossRef

28. Kodirov, Sh., & Amonov, N. (2009). Private tutoring in Tajikistan. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 143-166). IIEP-UNESCO.

29. Kwo, O., & Bray, M. (2011). Facing the shadow education system in Hong Kong. IIAS Newsletter [University of Leiden, International Institute for Asian Studies], 56(20). http://old.iias.asia/article/facing-shadow- education-system-hong-kong

30. Kwok, P. L. Y. (2004). Examination-oriented knowledge and value transformation in East Asian cram schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(1), 64-75. CrossRef

31. Liu, J. (2015). How a research instrument changed in different settings: Methodological lessons from adaptation and adjustment. In M. Bray, O. Kwo, & B. Jokić (Eds.), Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures (pp. 247-259). Comparative Education Research Centre (CERC), The University of Hong Kong and Springer. CrossRef

32. Loveluck, L. (2012, March). Education in Egypt: Key challenges [Background paper]. Chatham House.

33. Matiashvili, A., & Kutateladze, N. (2006). Georgia. In I. Silova, V. Būdiene, & M. Bray (Eds.), Education in a hidden marketplace: monitoring of private tutoring (pp. 191-209). Open Society Institute.

34. Murawska, B., & Putkiewicz, E. (2005). Private tutoring in Poland. The Institute of Public Affairs.

35. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Collins, K. M. (2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report,12(2), 281-316.

36. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools. 13(1), 48-63.

37. Popa, S., & Acedo, C. (2006). Redefining professionalism: Romanian secondary education teachers and the private tutoring system. International Journal of Educational Development, 26, 98-110. CrossRef

38. President Decree of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. 2829 (President Decree No. 2829). (2017, March 14). On measures to further improve the activities of secondary special and vocational education institutions. https://lex.uz/docs/3133119

39. Pussurmanova, G. (2017). Nature and factors influencing high school students and parents' demands for private supplementary tutoring in Kazakhstan [Unpublished master's thesis]. Nazarbayev University. https://nur.nu.edu.kz/bitstream/handle/123456789/2568/Gulzada_Pussurmanova.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

40. Robinson, K. (2013, May). How to escape education's death valley. TED talks education. http://youtu.be/wX78iKhInsc

41. Shafiq, M. N. (2002). The economic burden of private tutoring expenses on households in developing countries: The case of Bangladesh. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Comparative & International Education Society. Orlando, Florida, USA.

42. Silova, I. (Ed). (2009a). Introduction. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 27-32). IIEP-UNESCO.

43. Silova, I. (2009b). Global patterns and post-socialist realities in the private tutoring market: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 33-47). IIEP-UNESCO.

44. Silova, I. (2009c). Education and post-socialist transformations in Central Asia. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 49-68). IIEP-UNESCO.

45. Silova, I. (2009d). Examining the scope, nature and implications of private tutoring in Central Asia. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia. New opportunities and burdens (pp. 69-92). IIEP-UNESCO

46. Silova, I. (2010). Private tutoring in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: Policy choices and implications. Compare, 40(3), 327-344. CrossRef

47. Silova, I., & Bray, M. (2006a). The context: societies and education in the post-socialist transformation. In I. Silova, V. Būdiene, & M. Bray (Eds.), Education in a hidden marketplace: monitoring of private tutoring (pp. 41-60). Open Society Institute.

48. Silova, I., & Bray, M. (2006b). The hidden marketplace: Private tutoring in former Socialist countries. In I. Silova, V. Būdiene, & M. Bray (Eds.), Education in a hidden marketplace: monitoring of private tutoring (pp. 71-98). Open Society Institute.

49. Silova, I., & Kazimzade, E. (2006). Azerbaijan. In I. Silova, V. Būdiene, & M. Bray (Eds.), Education in a hidden marketplace: monitoring of private tutoring (pp. 113-141). Open Society Institute.

50. Sun, M. Y. F. (2017). Private supplementary tutoring in a Hong Kong primary school: What Chinese and English teachers think about the phenomenon, and how tutoring may affect dimensions of teacher professionalism [Unpublished master's thesis]. The University of Hong Kong.

51. Teddlie, Ch., & Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori & Ch. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Sage.

52. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2017). Global education monitoring report, 2017/8: Accountability in education - Meeting our commitments. UNESCO.

53. Wang, D., & Bray, M. (2016). When whole-person development encounters social stratification: Teachers' ambivalent attitudes towards private supplementary tutoring in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5), 873-881. CrossRef