Rámcové vzdělávací programy a paradigma světových náboženství

The paper deals with the world religions paradigm (WRP) in education on religions in the Czech education. The paper summarizes the criticism of WRP in the study of religions. The WRP formed in the 19th century under strong influence of Christian theology and colonialism, there are no objective criteria for its defining, it is highly abstract, ahistorical and it leads to essentialism and normative understanding of religions. The analysis of framework education programmes reveals that the WRP is applied in this curricular documents. The framework programme for basic education covers Christianity, Judaism and Islam, while Christianity has a privileged position. Framework programme for secondary education connects religions with the concept of civilization circles. World religions, understood in essentialistic and highly abstract terms, represent a basis for culture circles. This concept corresponds with the model of world civilizations by S. P. Huntington. In this perspective, world civilizations are based on religious traditions of WRP. European civilization is founded on Christianity, other religions are represented as aliens. The WRP in framework programmes enables formation of stereotypes on religious traditions and identities.

1. Alberts, T. K. (2016). Shamanism, discourse, modernity. New York: Routledge. CrossRef

2. Asad, T. (2001). Reading a modern classic. W. C. Smith's 'The Meaning and End of Religion'. History of Religions, 40(3), 205–222. CrossRef

3. Barnard, A. (2004). History and theory in anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Bell, C. (2006). Paradigms behind (and before) the modern concept of religion. History and Theory, 45(4), 27–46. CrossRef

5. Beneš, Z. (2005). Výzva nebo destrukce? Česká kurikulární reforma a dějepis. Pedagogika, 55(1), 37–47.

6. Burman, E., & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1993). Discourse analytic research: Repertoires and readings of texts in action. London: Routledge.

7. Cotter, Ch. R., & Robertson, G. R. (Eds.). (2016). After world religions: Reconstructing religious studies. New York: Routledge. CrossRef

8. Cox, J. L. (2007). From primitive to indigenous: The academic study of indigenous religions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

9. Čermáková, E., & Topinka, D. (2016). Obraz islámu a muslimů v učebnicích pro základní školy. In D. Topinka (Ed.), Muslimové v Česku: Etablování muslimů na veřejnosti (s. 202–213). Brno: Barrister & Principal.

10. Černá, Z. (2017). Reflexe náboženství ve vzdělávání s důrazem na analýzu českých středoškolských materiálů. Pardubice: UP.

11. Dubuisson, D. (2003). The western construction of religion: Myths, knowledge, and ideology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

12. Dvořák, D. (2007). Pojmová analýza jednoho společenskovědního tématu v RVP. In T. Janík, P. Knecht, & V. Najvarová (Eds.), Příspěvky k tvorbě a výzkumu kurikula (s. 111–120). Brno: Paido.

13. Dvořák, D. (2012). Od osnov ke standardům: Proměny kurikulární teorie a praxe. Praha: PedF UK.

14. Dvořáková, I. (2010). Obsahová analýza / formální obsahová analýza / kvantitativní obsahová analýza. AntropoWebzin, (2), s. 95–99. Dostupné z http://www.antropoweb.cz/media/document/antropowebzin-2-2010_1_.pdf

15. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman Group Limited.

16. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman Group Limited.

17. Fitzgerald, T. (1990). Hinduism and the "World Religion" fallacy. Religion, 20(2), 101–118. CrossRef

18. Fitzgerald, T. (2000). The ideology of religious studies. New York: Oxford University Press.

19. Foucault, M. (2007). Slova a věci. Brno: Computer Press.

20. Fujda, M. (2010). Akulturace hinduismu a formování moderní religiozity: K sociálním dějinám českého okultismu 1891–1941. Praha: Malvern.

21. Geaves, R. (2005). The dangers of essentialism: South Asian communities in Britain and the 'world religions' approach to the study of religions. Contemporary South Asia, 14(1), 75–90. CrossRef

22. Hartney, Ch., & Tower, D. J. (2016). Religious categories and the construction of the indigenous. Boston: Brill. CrossRef

23. Harwell, M. R. (2011). Research design in qualitative/quantitative/mixed methods. In C. F. Conrad & R. C. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook for research in education: Pursuing ideas as the keystone of exemplary inquiry (s. 147–182). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. CrossRef

24. Havlíček, J. (2011). Cesty božstev: Otázky interpretace náboženství a nacionalismu v moderním Japonsku. Brno: MU.

25. Havlíček, J. (2013). Existuje v Japonsku náboženství? Kategorie náboženství a postmoderní kritika v sociálních vědách. Religio, 21(2), 163–188.

26. <bez popisu> CrossRef

27. Horyna, B. (1994). Úvod do religionistiky. Praha: ISE – Institut pro středoevropskou kulturu a politiku, Oikúmené.

28. Huntington, S. (2001). Střet civilizací: Boj kultur a proměna světového řádu. Praha: Rybka Publishers.

29. Chidester, D. (2014). Empire of religion: Imperialism and comparative religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

30. Christie, Ch. (2007). Content analysis. In R. Baumeister & K. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (s. 176). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. CrossRef

31. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A quide to methods, practice and using software. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. CrossRef

32. Květina, J. (2016). Koncepce liberalismu a demokracie v edukačním procesu: Dekonstrukce neoliberální dominance v RVP. Pedagogika, 66(3), 312–329. CrossRef

33. Lane, G. (2006). Daily life in the Mongol empire. London: Greenwood Press.

34. Leaf, M. J. (2014a). The anthropology of Eastern religions: Ideas, organizations, and constituencies. Lanham: Lexington Books.

35. Leaf, M. J. (2014b). The anthropology of Western religions: Ideas, organizations, and constituencies. Lanham: Lexington Books.

36. Lundberg, Z. (2004). Bahā'ī and the holy land: Religiogenesis and Shoghi Effendi's The faith of Bahā'u'llāh: A world religion. In M. Sharon (Ed.), Studies in modern religions, religious movements and the Bābī-Bahā'ī faiths (s. 299–317). Leiden: Brill.

37. Lužný, D. (1997). Nová náboženská hnutí. Brno: MU.

38. Lynch, G. (2012). Living with two cultural turns: The case of the study of religion. In S. Roseneil & S. Frosh (Eds.), Social research after the cultural turn (s. 73–92). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef

39. Masuzawa, T. (2005). The invention of world religions: Or, how European universalism was preserved in the language of pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossRef

40. Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2), b. s. Dostupné z http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0002204

41. McCutcheon, R. T. (1997). Manufacturing religion: The discourse on sui generis religion and the politics of nostalgia. New York: Oxford University Press.

42. Molendijk, A. L. (2016). Friedrich Max Müller and the sacred books of the East. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

43. Muzzey, D. S. (1943). Ethical religion: Its historical sources, its elements, its sufficiency, its future. New York: New Union Press.

44. Oberoi, H. (1994). The construction of religious boundaries: Culture, identity, and diversity in the Sikh tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

45. Owen, S. (2011). The world religions paradigm. Time for a change. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 10(3), 253–268. CrossRef

46. Pennington, B. K. (2005). Was Hinduism invented? Britons, Indians, and the colonial construction of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

47. Robinson, C. A. (2006). Interpretations of the Bhagavad-Gita and images of the Hindu tradition: The song of the lord. London: Routledge.

48. RVP G. (2007). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro gymnázia. Dostupné z http://www.msmt.cz/uploads/Vzdelavani/Skolska_reforma/RVP/RVP_gymnazia.pdf

49. RVP ZV. (2016). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání. Dostupné z http://www.msmt.cz/file/37052/

50. Said, E. W. (2001). The clash of ignorance. Nation, 273(12), 11–14.

51. Smart, N. (1969). The religious experience of mankind. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.

52. Smith, J. Z. (1998). Religion, religions, religious. In M. C. Taylor (Ed.), Critical terms for religious studies (s. 269–284). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

53. Smith, W. C. (1962). The meaning and end of religion. New York: Mentor Books.

54. Stocking, G. W. (Ed.). (1996). Volksgeist as method and ethic: Essays on Boasian ethnography and the German anthropological tradition. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

55. Stump, R. W. (2008). The geography of religion: Time, place, and space. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

56. Sun, A. X. D. (2013). Confucianism as a world religion: Contested histories and contemporary realities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

57. Tiele, C. P. (1886). Religions. In The encyclopædia Britannica: Dictionary of arts, sciences, and general literature, ninth edition, volume XX (s. 358–371). Edinburgh: Adame and Charles Black.

58. Tomalin, E. (2013). Religions and development. New York: Routledge. CrossRef

59. Troeltsch, E. (1923/1999). Christian thought: Its history and application. Lectures written for delivery in England during March 1923. Eugene: Wipf & Stock Publishers.

60. Vlčková, K. (2011). Smíšený výzkum: Jedná se o nové a závažné téma? In T. Janík, P. Knecht, & S. Šebestová (Eds.), Smíšený design v pedagogickém výzkumu: Sborník příspěvků z 19. výroční konference České asociace pedagogického výzkumu (s. 1–6). Brno: MU.

61. Waardenburg, J. (1996). Bohové zblízka: Systematický úvod do religionistiky. Brno: MU.

62. Weber, M. (1915/1946). The social psychology of the world religions. In H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (s. 267–301). New York: Oxford University Press.

63. Weber, M. (1920/1989). Die Wirtschaftsethik der Weltreligionen – Konfuzianismus und Taoismus: Schriften 1915–1920. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

64. Weber, M. (1923/1998). Sociologie náboženství. Praha: Vyšehrad.

65. Zbíral, D. (2007). Největší hereze: Dualismus, učenecká vyprávění o katarství a budování křesťanské Evropy. Praha: Argo.