Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 61 No 4 (2015), 73–85
Status menšinových jazyků v německém právu – právo na topografická označení a na užívání jazyka ve veřejné sféře
[Status of Minority Languages in German Law – The Right to Topographical Indications and to the Use of Language in the Public Sphere]
Martina Fraňková
published online: 06. 01. 2016
abstract
The study concerns itself with the status of minority languages in the Federal Republic of Germany with the focus on the right to topographical indications and the use of language in the public sphere, i.e. the contact of a citizen with courts, public authorities and bodies of local governments. The study works on the obligations undertaken by the Federal Republic of Germany in the European Council on the basis of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the Charter of Minority Languages at the end of the 1990s. Considering the theoretical basis of German law, both instruments have the character of federal laws; however, the implementation of particular obligations is vested in individual states. The study deals with the status of the Danish, Frisian, Romany and Sorbian languages, i.e. languages of so-called traditional minorities. A brief introduction to individual minorities and their languages is followed by a summary of their regulation at the constitutional and under-constitutional level, namely the regulation of Danish minority and the Danish language in Schleswig-Holstein, of the Frisians and the Northern and Sater Frisian language in Schleswig-Holstein and Lower Saxony, and of Lusatian Sorbs and Lower and Upper Sorbian in Brandenburg and Saxony. When asserting their rights to the communication with public authorities and bodies of local governments in their minority language and to topographical indications, the minorities are confronted with the ignorance of the regulation of said rights or with the inadequate language training of officers. Also, the particular regulation of rights at the level of individual states might lead to a different standard of protection even within the framework of one and the same language. The situation is different in the case of Roma and Sinti and of the Romany language as, unlike the aforementioned minorities, they are scattered throughout a larger number of constituent states; the Romany language is not codified in the Federal Republic of Germany; the main emphases are put rather on rights connected with education and the social sphere, as well as on the prohibition of discrimination in general. The main benefit of said conventions is, apart from increasing the standard of legal protection of the above stated minorities, the reinforcement of their status with respect to public authorities and bodies of selfgovernments, as well as the opening of a public debate on the issue of rights of minorities in general.
keywords: Federal Republic of Germany; Danish; Frisian; Lusatian Sorbian; Roma and Sinti; topographical indications; minority languages in the public sphere Spolková republika Německo; dánština; fríština; lužická srbština; Romové a Sintové; topografická označení; menšinový jazyk ve veřejné sféře
Status menšinových jazyků v německém právu – právo na topografická označení a na užívání jazyka ve veřejné sféře is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478