Violence against Men as Moderated by Couple’s Self-Control Configurations

In this paper we adhere to the view that the boundaries between common couple or situational violence and criminal act in the sense of the legal definition of the domestic violence are not totally sharp. The key thesis of general theory of crime (Gottfredson, 2005) about the importance of self-control we can develop so that the reasonable selfcontrol can act as a protective factor on the side of the men as victims of intimate partner violence. Our question is whether the individual characteristics of both actors do not create specific composition (configuration), which operates in the form of conflicts, or may encourage the emergence of IPV. For good reasons, however, we think more about the mediation role of these self-control configurations. We can justify it by the assumption that higher self-control in the case of men can support the state in which the victim is overestimating his own potential and manifested even patronizing attitude towards the offender. Our 5 item typology reconstructed for a representative sample of Czech men (N = 1001) demonstrates some special effects of asymmetric configurations. On the other side the calamity configuration based on the lack of self-control on both sides appears still as the most risky. The level of victimization of men seems to be similar if compared to women and their chance to solve the problem is limited due to some specific reasons which are discussed as well.

1. Archer, J. (2000). Sex Differences in Aggression Between Heterosexual Partners: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680. CrossRef

2. Archer, J. (2002). Sex differences and physically aggressive acts between heterosexual partners: A metaanalytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(4), 313–351. CrossRef

3. Arneklev, B. J., Grasmick, H. G., & Bursik, R. J., Jr. (1999). Evaluating the dimensionality and invariance of 'low self-control.' Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15, 307–331. CrossRef

4. Berger, B., & Berger, P. L. (1983). The War over the Family: Capturing the Middle Ground. Hutchinson Educ.

5. Buriánek, J. (2013). Violence Against Men as a Challenging Topic for Empirical Research. Pp. 61–70. In: A.Kuhn et al. (eds.), Kriminologie, Kriminalpolitik und Strafrecht aus internazionaler Perspektive, Staempfli Verlag AG Bern.

6. Buriánek, J., Kovařík, L., Zimmelová, P., & Švestková, R. (2006). Domácí násilí – násilí na mužích a seniorech. [Domestic violence – violence against men and seniors] Prague: Triton.

7. Buriánek, J., & Pikálková, S. (2013). Intimate Violence. A Czech Contribution on International Violence Against Women Survey. Prague: Karolinum.

8. Buriánek, J., Pikálková, S., & Podaná, Z. (2014). Násilí na mužích. Sonda do zákoutí partnerských vztahů. [Violence against men. A sondage on secluded places of partner relationships] Prague: FF UK.

9. Buriánek, J., Pikálková, S., & Podaná, Z. (2015). Abused, Battered, or Stalked: Violence in Intimate Partner Relations Gendered. Prague: Karolinum.

10. Burton Jr, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans, T. D., Alarid, L. F., & Dunaway, R. G. (1998). Gender, self-control, and crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35(2), 123–147. CrossRef

11. Chan, K. L. (2012). Gender symmetry in the self-reporting of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(2), 263–286. CrossRef

12. Cook, P. W. (1997). Abused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violence. Westport: Praeger.

13. Čírtková, L. (2002). Domácí násilí ve faktech a teoriích. [Domestic violence in facts and theories]. Gender – rovné příležitosti – výzkum 1/2002.

14. Čírtková, L. (2010), Muži jako oběti domácího násilí. [Men as victims of domestic violence]. Právo a rodina, 2010(7).

15. Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (1979). Violence Against Wives. A Case Against the Patriarchy. New York: The Free Press.

16. Dobash, R. P., & Dobash, R. E. (2004). Women's violence to men in intimate relationships: Working on a puzzle. British journal of criminology, 44(3), 324–349. CrossRef

17. Gelles, R. J. (2003). Violence in the family. Pp. 837–862. In: W. Heitmeyer, & J. Hagan (eds.), International Handbook of Violence Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossRef

18. Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

19. Gottfredson, M. R. (2005). The empirical status of control theory in criminology. Pp. 77–100. In: F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. Blevins, Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, Piscataway, New Jersey: Transaction.

20. Gottfredson, M. R. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

21. Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik Jr, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. CrossRef

22. Heiskanen, M. & Ruuskanen, E. (2011). Men's experiences of violence in Finland 2009. Helsinki: HEUNI.

23. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. R. (2000). In defense of self-control. Theoretical Criminology, 4(1), 55–69. CrossRef

24. Johnson, H., Ollus, N., & Nevala, S. (2008). Violence Against Women. An International Perspective. New York: Springer.

25. Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294. CrossRef

26. Johnson, M. P. (2006). Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence against women, 12(11), 1003–1018. CrossRef

27. Jungnitz, L. et al. (2004). Violence against men. Men's experience of interpersonal violence in Germany. Federal Ministry for Family Affairs.

28. Killias, M., Haymoz, S., & Lamon, P. (2006). Swiss Crime Survey. Die Kriminalitaet in der Schweiz im Lichte der Opferbefragung von 1984 bis 2005. Bern, Staempfli Verlang AG.

29. Kimmel, M. S. (2002). "Gender symmetry" in domestic violence: A substantive and methodological research review. Violence against women, 8(11), 1332–1363. CrossRef

30. Lenz, H.-J. (2006). Gewalt gegen Männer als neues Thema in Forschung und Gesellschaft. Pp. 98–116. In: W. Heitmeyer/M. Schröttle (Hrsg.): Gewalt. Beschreibungen, Analysen, Prävention. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.

31. Levinson, D. (1989). Family Violence in Cross-Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. Marshall, I., & Enzmann, D. (2012). The Generalizability of Self-Control Theory. Pp. 285–328. In: J. Junger-Tas, I. H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska, The Many Faces of Youth Crime. Contrasting Theoretical Perspectives on Juvenile Delinquency across Countries and Cultures, New York: Springer.

32. Martinková, M., & Macháčková, R. (2001). Vybrané kriminologické a právní aspekty domácího násilí. [Selected criminological and legal aspects of domestic violence] Prague: IKSP.

33. Martinková, M., Slavětínský, V., & Vlach, J. (2014). Vybrané problémy z oblasti domácího násilí. [Selected problems of domestic violence]. Prague: IKSP.

34. Mutchnick, R., Martin, R., & Austin, W. T. (2009). Travis Hirschi. Pp. 283–326. In: Criminological Thought: Pioneers Past and Present. Upper Saddle River, N J: Prentice Hall.

35. Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family Violence. New York: Prager.

36. Pikálková S. (ed.) (2004) Mezinárodní výzkum násilí na ženách – ČR/2003: příspěvek k sociologickému zkoumání násilí v rodině. [International research on violence against women – CR / 2003: contribution to the sociological exploration of family violence]. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV.

37. Pikálková, S., Podaná, Z., & Buriánek, J. (2015). Ženy jako oběti partnerského násilí: sociologická perspektiva. [Women as victims of intimate partner violence: a sociological view] Prague: SLON.

38. Piquero, A. R. (2008). Measuring self-control. Pp. 26–37. In: E. Goode (ed.), Out of Control: Assessing the General Theory of Crime, Stanford, Cal.: Stanford University Press.

39. Podaná, Z. (2010). Reporting to the police as a response to intimate partner violence. Czech Sociological Review, 46(3), 453–474.

40. Podaná, Z., & Imríšková, R. (2016). Victims' responses to stalking: An examination of fear levels and coping strategies. Journal of interpersonal violence, 31(5), 792–809. CrossRef

41. Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime: A metaanalysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964. CrossRef

42. Radimská, R. (2003). Moc a individuální zájmy v partnerských vztazích. [Power and individual interests in intimate partnership]. Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, 4(3–4), 4–5.

43. Rebellon, C. J., Straus, M. A., & Medeiros, R. (2008). Self-control in global perspective: An empirical assessment of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory within and across 32 national settings. European journal of criminology, 5(3), 331–361. CrossRef

44. Salmi, V., & Danielsson, P. (2014). Intimate partner violence victimization and household financial strain. Journal of Scandinavian studies in criminology and crime prevention, 15(2), 159–166. CrossRef

45. Straus, M. A. (2006). Future research on gender symmetry in physical assaults on partners. Violence against women, 12(11), 1086–1097. CrossRef

46. Straus, M. A. (2010). Thirty years of denying the evidence on gender symmetry in partner violence: Implications for prevention and treatment. Partner Abuse, 1(3), 332–362. CrossRef

47. Straus, M. A. (2014), Bringing couple-level measures and family contradictions into research through dyadic concordance types. Unpublished manuscript. Durham, NH: Family Research Laboratory. Retrieved from http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2

48. Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1980). Behind Closed Doors: Violence in the American Family. New York: Doubleday/Anchor.

49. Svoboda, M. (2010). Pomoc mužům jako obětem domácího násilí v ČR. [Helping men as victims of domestic violence in the Czech Republic] Prague: Charles University.

50. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Prevalence and consequences of male-to-female and female-to-male intimate partner violence as measured by the National Violence Against Women Survey. Violence against women, 6(2), 142–161. CrossRef

51. Voňková, J., & Huňková, M. (2004). Domácí násilí v českém právu z pohledu žen. [Domestic violence in Czech law from the perspective of women]. Prague: Profem.

52. Vymětalová [Pikálková], S. (2001). Domácí násilí: přirozený jev? Sociologický časopis (Czech Sociological Review), 37(1), 103–121.

53. Walker, L. E. (1979). The Battered Woman. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

54. Walklate, S. (2001). Gender, Crime and Criminal Justice. Devon: Willan Publishing.

55. Wikström, P. O. H., & Treiber, K. (2007). The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. European Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 237–264. CrossRef

56. Winstok, Z. (2007). Toward an interactional perspective on intimate partner violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(3), 348–363. CrossRef

57. Winstok, Z., & Straus, M. A. (2014). Gender differences in the link between intimate partner physical violence and depression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(2), 91–101. CrossRef

58. Wolf, M. E., Ly, U., Hobart, M. A., & Kernic, M. A. (2003). Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. Journal of family Violence, 18(2), 121–129. CrossRef