AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA
AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA

AUC Philosophica et Historica je víceoborový akademický časopis zaměřený na humanitní a společenskovědné obory (filozofie, psychologie, pedagogika, sociologie, obecné, české a hospodářské dějiny, pomocné vědy historické a archivnictví, etnologie).

Časopis je indexován v databázích CEEOL, DOAJ a EBSCO.

AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA, Vol 2016 No 2 (2016), 115–131

Panuje rovnováha mezi pracovním úsilím a odměnami u profesionálů v dlouhodobé péči?

[Is there a Balance between Work Effort and Rewards by the Professionals in the Long-Term Care?]

Blanka Jirkovská

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2016.18
zveřejněno: 29. 09. 2016

Abstract

Model Effort Reward Imbalance (ERI) belongs to the basic concepts of mapping workplace stress. It examines the relationship between the long-term subjectively perceived level of workers’ effort and rewards and analyses the physical and psychosocial consequences of the (im)balance. We conducted verification of the ERI model on a sample of Czech professionals caring for the elderly in 2014 (N = 265). The survey included 12 facilities providing health and social services for the elderly. It was divided into 4 groups according to two criteria: facilities providing residential/field services and “medical” / “social workers”. We found that the majority of professional caregivers suffer from imbalance between higher effort and lower rewards and this discrepancy is reflected in the reduction of their well-being. The level of imbalance differs among defined groups. The outputs correspond to foreign studies and confirm the validity of the ERI model.

klíčová slova: Effort Reward Imbalance Model; effort and rewards of employees; stress at workplace; well-being; workers in long-term care

reference (35)

1. Bakker, A., Killmer, C., Siegrist, J. & Schaufeli, W. (2000). Effort-reward imbalance and burnout among nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(4), 884–891. CrossRef

2. Colombo, F. & Mercier, J. (2011). Help wanted!: Balancing fair protection and financial sustainability in long-term care. Eurohealth, 17(2–3), 3–6. CrossRef

3. De Jonge, J., Bosma, H., Peter, R. & Siegrist, J. (2000). Job strain, effort-reward imbalance and employee well-being: a large-scale cross-sectional study. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1317–1327. CrossRef

4. Feldt, T., Huhtala, M., Kinnunen, U., Hyvonen, K., Makikangas, A. & Sonnentag, S. (2013). Long-term patterns of effort-reward imbalance and over-commitment: Investigating occupational well-being and recovery experiences as outcomes. Work & Stress, 27(1), 64–87. CrossRef

5. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Snyderman, B. (1993). The motivation to work (24. vyd.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

6. Huczynski, A. & Buchanan, D. (2007). Organizational behaviour: an introductory text (6. vyd.). NY: Pearson Education.

7. Hunt, A. (2003). Musculoskeletal Fitness: The Keystone in Overall Well-Being and Injury Prevention. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 409, 96–105. CrossRef

8. Janečkova, H. & Hnilicova, H. (2009). Úvod do veřejného zdravotnictví. Praha: Portal.

9. Jirkovska, B. (2014). Nerovnovaha mezi usilim zaměstnanců a odměnami: Model Effort Reward Imbalance. Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Studia Sociologica, 20(2), 87–102.

10. Kebza, V. & Šolcova, I. (2003). Well-being jako psychologicky a zaroveň mezioborově založeny pojem. Československá psychologie, 47(4), 333–345.

11. Keyes, C. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 121–140. CrossRef

12. Kolman, L., Noorderhaven, N., Hofstede, G. & Dienes, E. (2003). Cross‐cultural differences in Central Europe. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18(1), 76–88. CrossRef

13. Křivohlavy, J. (1998). Jak neztratit nadšení. Praha: Grada.

14. Leineweber, C., Wege, N., Westerlund, H., Theorell, T., Wahrendorf, M. & Siegrist, J. (2010). How valid is a short measure of effort-reward imbalance at work? A replication study from Sweden. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 67(8), 526–531. CrossRef

15. Lyubomirsky, S. (2001). Why are some people happier than others?: The role of cognitive and motivational proceses in well-being. American Psychologist, 137–155. CrossRef

16. Msaouel, P., Keramaris, N., Apostolopoulos, A., Syrmos, N., Kappos, T., Tasoulis, A. & Siegrist, J. (2012). The Effort-reward Imbalance Questionnaire in Greek: Translation, Validation and Psychometric Properties in Health Professionals. Journal of Occupational Health, 54(2), 119–130. CrossRef

17. Pikhart, H., Bobak, M., Siegrist, J., Pajak, A., Rywik, S., Kyshegyi, J. & Marmot, M. (2001). Psychosocial work characteristics and self rated health in four post-communist countries. Epidemiol Community Health, 55, 624–630. CrossRef

18. Průša, L. (2011). Model efektivního financování a poskytování dlouhodobé péče. Praha: Vyzkumny ustav prace a socialnich věci. Dostupne z http://praha.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/vz_340.pdf

19. Ryff, C. & Keyes, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719–727. CrossRef

20. Řehakova, B. (2000). Nebojte se logisticke regrese. Sociologický časopis, 36(4), 475–492.

21. Siegrist, J., Li, J. & Montano, D. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. Dusseldorf: Institut fur Medizinische Soziologie. Dostupne z http://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de.

22. Siegrist, J. & Montano, D. (2012). ERI – Questionnaires – Users Guide. Dusseldorf: Institut fur Medizinische Soziologie. Dostupne z http://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de.

23. Siegrist, J. (2008). Effort-reward imbalance at work: Theory, measurement and evidence. Dostupne z http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/resources/theorie_measurement_evidence.pdf.

24. Siegrist, J., Wahrendorf, M., Von dem Knesebeck, O., Jurges, H. & Borsch-Supan, A. (2006). Quality of work, well-being, and intended early retirement of older employees-baseline results from the SHARE Study. European Journal of Public Health, 17(1), 62–68. CrossRef

25. Siegrist, J. & Rodel, A. (2005). Arbeitsbelastungen im Altenpflegeberuf: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Wiedereinstiegsproblematik. Dusseldorf: Institut fur Medizinische Soziologie der Heinrich Heine-Universitat Dusseldorf.

26. Siegrist, J., Starke, D., Chandola, T., Godin, I., Marmot, M., Niedhammer, I. & Peter, R. (2004). The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1483–1499. CrossRef

27. Siegrist, J. (2000). Place, social exchange and health: proposed sociological framework. Social Science, 51(9), 1283–1293. CrossRef

28. Siegrist, J. (1996). Adverse Health Effects of High-Effort/Low-Reward Conditions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(1), 27–41. CrossRef

29. Šolcova, I. & Kebza, V. (2005). Prediktory osobni pohody (well-being) u reprezentativniho souboru česke populace. Československá psychologie, 49(1), 1–8.

30. Šolcova, I. & Kebza, V. (2004). Kvalita života v psychologii: Osobni pohoda (well-being), jeji determinant a prediktory. In H. Hnilicova (ed.), Kvalita života: sborník příspěvků z konference, konané dne 25. 10. 2004 v Třeboni (pp. 21–32). Kostelec nad Černymi lesy: Institut zdravotni politiky a ekonomiky.

31. Thompson, E. (2007). Development and Validation of an Internationally Reliable Short-Form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. CrossRef

32. Van Vegchel, N., De Jonge, J., Bosma, H. & Schaufeli, W. (2005). Reviewing the effort-reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 1117–1131. CrossRef

33. Van Vegchel, N., Jonge, J., Meijer, T. & Hamers, J. (2001). Different effort constructs and effort-reward imbalance: effects on employee well-being in ancillary health care workers. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34(1), 128–136. CrossRef

34. Vinopal, J. (2011). Indikator subjektivni kvality pracovniho života. Sociologický časopis, 47(5), 937–966.

35. Watson, D. & Clark, L. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465–490. CrossRef


vychází: 2 x ročně
ISSN: 0567-8293
E-ISSN: 2464-7055

Ke stažení