AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA
AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA

AUC Philosophica et Historica je víceoborový akademický časopis zaměřený na humanitní a společenskovědné obory (filozofie, psychologie, pedagogika, sociologie, obecné, české a hospodářské dějiny, pomocné vědy historické a archivnictví, etnologie).

Časopis je indexován v databázích CEEOL, DOAJ a EBSCO.

AUC PHILOSOPHICA ET HISTORICA, Vol 2016 No 2 (2016), 9–30

Teorie sociálních hnutí: přehledová studie

[Social Movement Theory: A Review Essay]

Jaromír Mazák

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2016.13
zveřejněno: 29. 09. 2016

Abstract

Throughout history social movements have taken on various forms, ranging from grassroots mobilizations to coalitions of professional organizations employing lawyers, project managers and PR specialists. They engage in their fights for both material and moral goals in various political contexts, use different resources, and strive to convince others of their world view. This paper deals with selected key social movement theories on the background of some pivotal past events. Its aim is to offer introduction as well as a basic theoretical overview.

klíčová slova: Social movements; new social movements; resource mobilization theory; political opportunity structure; political process theory; framing; transactional activism

reference (78)

1. Amenta, E. & Halfmann, D. (2012). Opportunity Knocks: The Trouble with Political Opportunity and What You Can Do about It. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest (pp. 227–239). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

2. Barša, P. & Cisař, O. (2004). Levice v postrevoluční době: Občanská společnost a nová sociální hnutí v radikální politické teorii 20. století. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.

3. Benford, R. D. (1997). An Insider's Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409–430. CrossRef

4. Benford, R. D. & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. CrossRef

5. Bennett, P. W. L. & Segerberg, D. A. (2013). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

6. Bevington, D. & Dixon, C. (2005). Movement-relevant Theory: Rethinking Social Movement Scholarship and Activism. Social Movement Studies, 4(3), 185–208. CrossRef

7. Bob, C. (2005). The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

8. Buechler, S. M. (1995). New Social Movement Theories. The Sociological Quarterly, 36(3), 441–464. CrossRef

9. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.

10. Choe, H. & Kim, J. (2012). South Korea's democratization movements, 1980–1987: political structure, political opportunity, and framing. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 13(1), 55–68. CrossRef

11. Cisař, O. (2008). Politický aktivismus v České republice: Sociální hnutí a občanská společnost v období transformace a evropeizace [z anglickeho originalu Political Activism in the Czech Republic]. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury (CDK).

12. Cisař, O. (2010). Externally Sponsored Contention: The Channelling of Environmental Movement Organisations in the Czech Republic after the Fall of Communism. Environmental Politics, 19(5), 736–755. CrossRef

13. Cisař, O. & Vrablikova, K. (2012). Transnational Activism of Social Movement Organizations: The Effect of European Union Funding on Local Groups in the Czech Republic. European Union Politics, 14(1), 140–160. CrossRef

14. Costain, P. A. N. (1994). Inviting Women's Rebellion: A Political Interpretation of the Women's Movement. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Cotgrove, S. & Duff, A. (1980). Environmentalism, middle‐class radicalism and politics. Sociological Review, 28(2), 333–351.

15. D'Emilio, J. (2003/2009). The Gay Liberation Movement (from Sexual Politics, Sexual Communities). In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts (2. vyd., pp. 75–83). Chichester, Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

16. Davies, S. (1999). From Moral Duty to Cultural Rights: A Case Study of Political Framing in Education. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 1–21. CrossRef

17. Della Porta, D. & Diani, M. (1999/2006). Social movements: an introduction (2. vyd.). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

18. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. CrossRef

19. Eisinger, P. K. (1973). The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities. The American Political Science Review, 67(1), 11–28. CrossRef

20. Eltantawy, N. & Wiest, J. B. (2011). The Arab Spring| Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory. International Journal of Communication, 5, 1207–1224.

21. Fagan, A. (2004). Environment and Democracy in the Czech Republic: The Environmental Movement in the Transition Process. Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. CrossRef

22. Fagan, A. (2005). Taking Stock of Civil-Society Development in Post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Democratization, 12(4), 528–547. CrossRef

23. Ferree, M. M. & Miller, F. D. (1985). Mobilization and Meaning: Toward an Integration of Social Psychological and Resource Perspectives on Social Movements. Sociological Inquiry, 55(1), 38–61. CrossRef

24. Freeman, J. (1973). The Origins of the Women's Liberation Movement. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 792–811. CrossRef

25. Gahan, P. G. & Pekarek, A. H. (2008). From Resource Mobilization to Strategic Capacity: Reconceptualizing Resources and Capabilities in Social Movement Theory. WERRC: Research Report 07/08 September 2008.

26. Gamson, W. A. & Meyer, D. S. (1996) Framing political opportunity. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 275–290). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

27. Giugni, M. (2009). Political Opportunities: From Tilly to Tilly. Swiss Political Science Review, 15(2), 361–367. CrossRef

28. Goldstone, J. A. & Tilly, C. (2001). Threat (and Opportunity): Popular Action and State Response in the Dynamics of Contentious Action. In R. Aminzade (ed.), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics (pp. 179–194). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

29. Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (1999). Caught in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory. Sociological Forum, 14(1), 27–54. CrossRef

30. Goodwin, J. & Jasper, J. M. (2003/2009). Editors' Introduction. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts (2. vyd., pp. 1–8). Chichester, Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

31. Howard, M. M. (2002). The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 157–169. CrossRef

32. Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Jasper, J. M. (2012). From Political Opportunity Structures to Strategic Interaction. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest (pp. 1–33). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

33. Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9(1), 527–553. CrossRef

34. Jenkins, J. C. & Eckert, C. M. (1986). Channeling Black Insurgency: Elite Patronage and Professional Social Movement Organizations in the Development of the Black Movement. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 812–829. CrossRef

35. Jenkins, J. C. (1998). Channeling Social Protest: Foundation Patronage of Contemporary Social Movements. In W. Powell & E. Clemens (ed.), Private Action and the Public Good (pp. 206–216). New Haven: Yale University Press.

36. Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(01), 57–85. CrossRef

37. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. CrossRef

38. Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3/4), 367–391. CrossRef

39. Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press.

40. Konnig, T. (1999). Patterns of movement recruitment: Why dense networks help recruitment to new social movements, but obstruct recruitment to the New Age movement. Paper Presented at the ASA Annual Meeting 1999 August 6–10. Dostupne z http://www.gwdg.de/~uspw/tkoenig/papers/recruitment_patterns.pdf.

41. Le Bon, G. (1895/2002). The crowd: a study of the popular mind. Mineola: Dover Publications.

42. McAdam, D. (1982/1985). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

43. McAdam, D. (1988). Freedom summer. New York: Oxford University Press.

44. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N. (ed.) (1996). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

45. McAdam, D. (1996) Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 23–40). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

46. McAdam, D. (2003/2009). Recruits to Civil Rights Activism. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts (2. vyd., pp. 66–74). Chichester, Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

47. McCammon, H. J., Newman, H. D., Muse, C. S. & Terrell, T. M. (2007). Movement Framing and Discursive Opportunity Structures: The Political Successes of the U. S. Women's Jury Movements. American Sociological Review, 72(5), 725–749. CrossRef

48. McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N. (1973). The trend of social movements in America: Professionalization and resource mobilization. Morristown: General Leaming Press.

49. McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241. CrossRef

50. McCarthy, J. D. & Zald, M. N. (2001). The Enduring Vitality of the Resource Mobilization Theory of Social Movements. In J. H. Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory (pp. 533–565). New York: Springer. CrossRef

51. Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and Political Opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 125–145. CrossRef

52. Meyer, D. S. & Minkoff, D. C. (2004). Conceptualizing Political Opportunity. Social Forces, 82(4), 1457–1492. CrossRef

53. Nelson, D. N. (1996). Civil Society Endangered. Social Research, 63(2), 345–368. Dostupne z http://www .jstor.org/stable/40971141.

54. Oberschall, A. (1973). Social Conflict and Social Movements. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

55. Oberschall, A. (1996). Opportunities and framing in the Eastern European revolts of 1989. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 93–121). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

56. Offe, C. (1985). New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics. Social Research, 52(4), 817–868.

57. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.

58. Olson, M. (2003/2009). The Free-Rider Problem. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts (2. vyd., pp. 60–65). Chichester, Malden, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

59. Petrova, T. & Tarrow, S. (2007). Transactional and Participatory Activism in the Emerging European Polity. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 74–94. CrossRef

60. Pichardo, N. A. (1997). New Social Movements: A critical review. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 411–430. CrossRef

61. Rhys H. Williams. (1995). Constructing the Public Good: Social Movements and Cultural Resources. Social Problems, 42(1), 124–144. CrossRef

62. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2001). Trust, honesty and corruption: reflection on the state-building process. European Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 526–570. CrossRef

63. Sawyers, T. M. & Meyer, D. S. (1999). Missed Opportunities: Social Movement Abeyance and Public Policy. Social Problems, 46(2), 187–206. CrossRef

64. Skovajsa, M. (2010). Občanský sektor: Organizovaná občanská společnost v České republice. Praha: Portal.

65. Skrentny, J. D. (2012). The Women's Movement. In J. Goodwin & J. M. Jasper (ed.), Contention in Context: Political Opportunities and the Emergence of Protest (pp. 153–174). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

66. Smelser, N. J. (1962). Theory of Collective Behavior. New York: Free Press. Snow, D. A. & Benford R. D. (1988). Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.

67. Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master Frames and Cycles of Protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (ed.), Frontiers in Social Movement Theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven: Yale University Press.

68. Snow, D. A., Benford, R. D., McCammon, H. J., Hewitt, L. & Fitzgerald, S. (2014). The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since Frame Alignment". Mobilization, 19(1), 23–45.

69. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Jr., Worden, S. K. & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481. CrossRef

70. Snow, D. A. & Soule, S. A. (2010). A Primer on Social Movements. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Snow, D. A., Zurcher, L. A., Jr. & Ekland-Olson, S. (1980). Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment. American Sociological Review, 45(5), 787–801. CrossRef

71. Steinberg, M. W. (1998). Tilting the Frame: Considerations on Collective Action Framing from a Discursive Turn. Theory and Society, 27(6), 845–872. CrossRef

72. Šťovičkova Jantulova, M. (2005). Analyza procesu profesionalizace v občanskem sektoru očima jeho akterů. Sociální studia, 1/2015, 131–146.

73. Tarrow, S. G. (1994/2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

74. Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. New York: Random House. Touraine, A. (1985). An Introduction to the Study of Social Movements. Social Research, 52(4), 749–787.

75. Voss, K. (1996). The collapse of a social movement: The interplay of mobilizing structures, framing, and political opportunities in the Knights of Labor. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 227–258). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

76. White, A. M. (1999). Talking feminist, talking Black: Micromobilization processes in a collective protest against rape. Gender & Society, 13(1), 77–100. CrossRef

77. Zdravomyslova, E. (1996). Opportunities and framing in the transition to democracy: The case of Russia. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (ed.), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements (pp. 122–137). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef

78. Znebejanek, F. (1997). Sociální hnutí: Teorie, koncepty, představitelé. Praha: SLON.


vychází: 2 x ročně
ISSN: 0567-8293
E-ISSN: 2464-7055

Ke stažení