Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (dále jen AUCI) je hlavním časopisem Právnické fakulty UK. Vychází od roku 1954, patří tak mezi tradiční právnické časopisy teoretického zaměření.
Jako obecný právnický časopis přináší delší studie i kratší články o jakýchkoli relevantních otázkách v právní teorii i mezinárodním, evropském a vnitrostátním právu. AUCI také publikuje materiály vztahující se k aktuálním otázkám legislativy. AUCI je recenzovaný časopis a přijímá příspěvky od českých i zahraničních autorů. Příspěvky zahraničních autorů jsou zveřejňovány v původním jazyku – slovenštině, angličtině, němčině, francouzštině.
AUCI je teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva. Jeho vydavatelem je Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Právnická fakulta, prostřednictvím nakladatelství Karolinum. Vychází čtyřikrát ročně, termíny vydání časopisu naleznete zde.
Články uveřejněné v časopise AUCI procházejí nezávislým recenzním řízením (peer review), které je oboustranně anonymní. Posuzovatelé z daného oboru vyjadřují své stanovisko k vědecké kvalitě příspěvku a vhodnosti publikace v časopisu. V případě připomínek je stanovisko zasíláno zpět autorovi s možností přepracování textu (blíže viz Pokyny pro autory – Průběh recenzního řízení).
Časopis AUCI (ISSN 0323-0619) je evidován v České národní bibliografii (vedena Národní knihovnou ČR) a v Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (veden American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI má přiděleno evidenční číslo periodického tisku e. č. MK E 18585.
V r. 2021 byl jako první časopis Právnické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy zařazen do prestižní mezinárodní databáze Scopus. Tato databáze společnosti Elsevier je největší abstraktovou a citační databází recenzované literatury na světě. Od zařazení do elitní databáze Scopus si redakce časopisu slibuje nejen zvýšení čtenosti časopisu, ale také nárůst zájmu o publikaci příspěvků jak českých, tak zahraničních autorů.
AUCI je tzv. časopisem otevřeným a veškerý jeho obsah je zveřejňován jak na webu fakulty, tak na webových stránkách nakladatelství Karolinum. Přístup k němu je bezplatný. Domovská stránka časopisu AUCI je na webových stránkách Nakladatelství Karolinum.
Časopis AUCI využívá licenci Creative Commons: CC BY 4.0.
Dlouhodobou archivaci digitálního obsahu časopisu zajišťuje Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 68 No 3 (2022), 123–138
International Commercial Arbitration as a Modern Self-Regulation Tool in Hybrid War
Olena M. Honcharenko, Olga O. Bakalinska, Olena A. Belianevych, Svitlana I. Bevz, Olena A. Chernenko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.40
zveřejněno: 14. 09. 2022
Abstract
One of the tools of self-regulation, which helps to settle a dispute between commercial counterparties from different states is international commercial arbitration. International commercial arbitration is an alternative to the dispute resolution process in state courts, that is – it is an alternative to the mechanisms of the state process. The problem of considering international commercial arbitration through the prism of self-regulation has not been studied from all perspectives and diversity. This issue is especially relevant when businesses seek protection of their violated rights to international commercial arbitration in a hybrid war. It is important to examine: how a self-regulatory instrument is able to implement protection when war is waged. The question arises whether private jurisdiction can provide adequate protection to commercial entities. What is the role of international commercial arbitration? How the public authorities will implement the decisions made by the arbitration against the aggressor state (the state violating investment obligations). Settlement of disputes in a hybrid war can be called “hybrid investment disputes” or “hybrid commercial disputes” depending on the object of the dispute.
klíčová slova: international arbitration; hybrid investment disputes; commercial disputes; businesses seek protection; international chambers of commerce
reference (40)
1. About the SCC [online]. 2020 [cit. 2021-09-03]. Available at: https://sccinstitute.com/about-the-scc/.
2. Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Moldova on the Encouragement and Mutual Protection of Investments [online]. 1998 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/901788244.
3. Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine on the Encouragement Mutual Protection of Investments [online]. 1998 [cit. 2021-09-05]. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/643_101.
4. American Arbitration Association International Centre for Dispute Resolution [online]. 2020 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: https://www.adr.org/about.
5. APPELBAUM, R. P. - FELSTINER, W. L. F. - GESSNER, V. Rules and networks: the legal culture of global business transactions. Portland: Hart Pub, 2001.
6. Arbitration Between JSC CB Privatbank and the Financial Company Finillon LLC as Claimants by The Russian Federation [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw10354.pdf.
7. BANTEKAS, I. Equal treatment of parties in international commercial arbitration. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2020, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 991-1011. CrossRef
8. BARBERIĆ, L. - ČOLAK, D. - DOLMAGIĆ, J. Prosecuting war crimes and meeting obligations under the convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms at the same time - the case of Croatia. Croatian International Relations Review. 2015, Vol. 21, pp. 41-46. CrossRef
9. BERMANN, G. A. Recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards: the interpretation and application of the New York convention by national courts. New York: Springer International Publishing, 2017. CrossRef
10. CAMERON, P. International energy investment law: the pursuit of stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
11. Decision No. А41-15132/2018 [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-05]. Available at: https://sudact.ru/vsrf/doc/QDufuquWk15u/?vsrf-txt=международный+коммерческий+арбитраж&vsrf-case_doc=&vsrf-lawchunkinfo=&vsrf-doc_type=&vsrf-date_from=&vsrf-date_to=&.
12. Decision of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation No. А40-169144/17 [online]. 2013 [2021-09-03]. Available at: https://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/980715r1.html.
13. DEZALAY, Y. - GARTH, B. G. Dealing in virtue: international commercial arbitration and the construction of a transnational legal order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
14. England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions [online]. 2011 [cit. 2021-09-06]. Available at: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2011/1957.html.
15. England and Wales High Court (Commercial Court) Decisions [online]. 2018 [cit. 2021-09-06]. Available at: https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/format.cgi?doc=/ew/cases/EWHC/Comm/2018/1797.html&query=(Ukraine-Russia)+AND+(BIT).
16. FARAH, A. Q. - HATTAB, R. M. The application of shariah finance rules in international commercial arbitration. Utrecht Law Review. 2020, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 117-139. CrossRef
17. FERREIRA, A. Intertwined paths of globalization and international investment law. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy. 2020, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 85-99. CrossRef
18. FIADJOE, A. Alternative dispute resolution: a developing world perspective. Abingdon: Routledge Cavendish, 2013. CrossRef
19. GONCHARENKO, O. - NESKORODZHENA, L. Self-regulation of culture: the role of public associations and electronic communication. Herald National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts. 2018, Vol. 4, pp. 121-126. CrossRef
20. HAUFLER, V. A public role for the private sector: industry self-regulation in a global economy. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2001.
21. HELLERSTEIN, J. United states district court southern district of New York [online]. 2009 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: http://www.pravo.ru/store/interdoc/doc/131/Yukos.pdf.
22. HONCHARENKO, О. M. International commercial arbitration. Nizhyn: Nizhyn Mykola Gogol State University Publishing House, 2014.
23. INCHAKOVA, A. - KAZACHENOK, S. To principles in the jurisprudence of international commercial arbitration: a comparative study of the London Court of international arbitration and the international commercial arbitration court at the chamber of commerce and industry of the Russian Federation. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues. 2018, Vol. 21, No. 3, article number 12.
24. Interinstitutional agreement on better law-making (2003/C 321/01). The European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities [online]. 2003 [2021-09-03]. Available at: www.legislationline.org/.../EU%20Interinstitutional%20Agre.
25. JEMIELNIAK, J. Comparative analysis as an autonomization strategy in international commercial arbitration. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law. 2018, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 155-173. CrossRef
26. JONES, Т. Russia held liable again over Crimean assets [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-05]. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1180413/russia-held-liable-again-over-crimean-assets.
27. KELLOR, F. American arbitration: its history, functions and achievements. Washington, BeardBooks, 1999.
28. MAZARAKI, N. A. Effective system of commercial disputes resolution as a prerequisite of economic progress. Scientific Bulletin of Polissia. 2018, Vol. 2, pp. 181-187. CrossRef
29. Naftogaz Wins Case in Hague Arbitration over Property Lost due to Crimea Occupation [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-03]. Available at: https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/naftogaz-wins-hague-arbitration-over-property-lost-in-crimea-annexation.html.
30. NJSC Naftogaz of Ukraine, PJSC State Joint Stock Company Chornomornaftogaz, PJSC Ukrtransgaz, Subsidiary Company Likvo, PJSC Ukrgasvydobuvannya, PJSC Ukrtransnafta, and Subsidiary Company Gaz Ukraiiny v the Russian Federation [online]. 1998 [cit. 2021-09-03]. Available at: https://www.italaw.com/cases/4381.
31. ORLOV, M. Protecting investments in the occupied territories [online]. 2018 [cit. 2021-09-06]. Available at: http://yur-gazeta.com/publications/practice/inshe/zahist-investiciy-na-okupovanih-teritoriyah.html.
32. Oschadbank Wins in International Arbitration USD 1.3 Billion from Russia as Compensation of Losses from Crimea Annexation [online]. 2018 [cit. 2021-09-05]. Available at: https://ukranews.com/en/news/598200-oschadbank-wins-in-international-arbitration-usd-13-billion-from-russia-as-compensation-of-losses.
33. PERRY, S. Enforcement of Crimea award upheld in Ukraine [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: https://globalarbitrationreview.com/article/1180117/enforcement-of-crimea-award-upheld-in-ukraine.
34. PIASNA, A. - BURCHELL, B. - SEHNBRUCH, K. Job quality in European employment policy: one step forward, two steps back? Transfer. 2019, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 165-180. CrossRef
35. Russia Refuses to Recognize the Hague Arbitration Court Decision on Ukraine's Assets in Crimea [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: https://uawire.org/russia-refuses-to-recognize-the-hague-arbitration-court-ruling-on-ukraine-s-assets-in-crimea#.
36. SANDERS, P. New York convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Arbitration. 1959, Vol. XXV, No. 3, pp. 109-110.
37. SOWMAN, M. - SUNDE, J. Social impacts of marine protected areas in South Africa on coastal fishing communities. Ocean and Coastal Management. 2018, Vol. 157, pp. 168-179. CrossRef
38. The Administration of Investment Disputes. SCC [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-04]. Available at: https://sccinstitute.com/dispute-resolution/investment-disputes/.
39. Ukraine's Naftogaz Achieves Interim Victory in the Crimean Asset's Lawsuit against Russia [online]. 2019 [cit. 2021-09-06]. Available at: http://uawire.org/ukraine-s-naftogaz-achieves-interim-victory-in-the-crimean-assets-lawsuit-against-russia.
40. VINNYK, O. M. - SHAPOVALOVA, O. V. - PATSURIIA, N. B. - HONCHARENKO, O. M. - YEFREMOVA, K. V. Problem of ensuring the social direction of the legislation of Ukraine on the digital economy. Asia Life Sciences. 2020, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 142-145.
International Commercial Arbitration as a Modern Self-Regulation Tool in Hybrid War is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
vychází: 4 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 65 Kč
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
