We are pleased to share that the AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.6 in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2023. AUC Geographica ranks (JCI) in Q3 in Geography.
AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.
AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.
Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31
All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.
AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
https://www.scopus.com/source/sourceInfo.uri?sourceId=27100&origin=recordpage
The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.
Journal metrics 2022
Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.6
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.24
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography
Scopus
Cite Score: 1.1
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences
The journal is archived in Portico.
AUC GEOGRAPHICA, Vol 58 No 2 (2023), 225–237
Consequences of capital drain among EU member states
Peter Deďo, David Hána
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2023.17
zveřejněno: 29. 11. 2023
Abstract
The aim of this article is to analyze the capital drain among individual European Union (EU) member states and its cohesive and political consequences. Since the capital drain has not yet been calculated at the individual country level, the methodological part of this article delves into this calculation in more detail. Between 1999 and 2018, Ireland and Luxembourg had the highest capital drain due to their tax haven policies. Apart from these extremes, Czechia experienced the largest capital drain during this period. Inequalities among EU member states were gradually decreasing in terms of gross domestic product and gross national disposable income, suggesting that the EU’s cohesion policy has partially been successful in reducing inequalities among EU countries. However, capital drain and its populist interpretations may become a significant political problem for the most negatively affected countries.
klíčová slova: capital drain; spatial inequalities; gross disposable income; gross domestic product; European Union
reference (73)
1. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Sayek, S. (2004): FDI and economic growth: the role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics 64(1), 89-112. CrossRef
2. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2018): World Inequality Report 2018. Cambridge, MA and London, England: Harvard University Press. CrossRef
3. AP News (2019): Poorer EU members oppose cuts in long-term budget. AP News, 5 November 2019, https://apnews.com/679ba30dd20440bfa066d7108a2f009f (accessed on 30 January 2020).
4. Becker, S. O., Egger, P. H., Von Ehrlich, M. (2010): Going NUTS: The effect of EU Structural Funds on regional performance. Journal of Public Economics 94(9-10), 578-590. CrossRef
5. Bečicová, I., Blažek, J. (2015): Is there a credit-gap in a periphery? The perception of this problem by small entrepreneurs. Journal of Rural Studies 42, 11-20. CrossRef
6. Boldrin, M., Canova, F. (2001): Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: reconsidering European regional policies. Economic Policy 16(32), 206-253. CrossRef
7. Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., Wachtel, P. (2005): Privatization matters: Bank efficiency in transition countries. Journal of Banking & Finance 29(8-9), 2155-2178. CrossRef
8. Borensztein, E., DeGregorio, J., Lee, J. W. (1998): How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics 45(1), 115-135. CrossRef
9. Cappelen, A., Castellacci, F., Fagerberg, J., Verspagen, B. (2003): The impact of EU regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4), 621-644. CrossRef
10. Carbonell, J. B., Werner, R. A. (2018): Does Foreign Direct Investment Generate Economic Growth? A New Empirical Approach Applied to Spain. Economic Geography 94(4), 425-456. CrossRef
11. Chmelař, A., Pícl, M., Bittner, J., Volčík, S., Nechuta, A. (2016): Analýza odlivu zisků: Důsledky pro českou ekonomiku a návrhy opatření [Analysis of the outflow of profits: Consequences for the Czech economy and proposals for measures]. Úřad vlády České republiky, Praha.
12. Coe, N. M., Hess, M., Yeung, H. W., Dicken, P., Henderson, J. (2004): 'Globalizing' Regional Development: A Global Production Networks Perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29(4), 468-484. CrossRef
13. Cuaresma, J. C., Ritzberger-Grünwald, D., Silgoner, M. A. (2008): Growth, convergence and EU membership. Applied Economics 40(5), 643-656. CrossRef
14. Dall'Erba, S., Fang, F. (2017): Meta-analysis of the impact of European Union Structural Funds on regional growth. Regional Studies 51(6), 822-832. CrossRef
15. Dall'Erba, S., Le Gallo, J. (2008): Regional convergence and the impact of European structural funds over 1989-1999: A spatial econometric analysis. Papers in Regional Science 87(2), 219-244. CrossRef
16. Delatte, A.-L., Guillin, A., Vicard, V. (2022): Grey zones in global finance: The distorted geography of cross-border investments. Journal of International Money and Finance 120(102540). CrossRef
17. Eckey, H. F., Türck, M. (2005): Convergence of EU-Regions. A Literature Report. Investigaciones Regionales 10(1), 5-32.
18. Ederveen, S., Groot, H. L., Nahuis, R. (2006): Fertile soil for structural funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos 59(1), 17-42. CrossRef
19. Esposti, R., Bussoletti, S. (2008): Impact of Objective 1 funds on regional growth convergence in the European Union: a panel-data approach. Regional Studies 42(2), 159-173. CrossRef
20. European Commission (2014): An introduction to EU Cohesion Policy 2014-2020, https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/basic/basic_2014_en.pdf (accessed on 16 September 2019).
21. Eurostat (2013): European system of accounts ESA 2010, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5925693/KS-02-13-269-EN.PDF/44cd9d01-bc64-40e5-bd40-d17df0c69334 (accessed on 16 September 2019).
22. Eurostat (2019): Eurostat database, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database (accessed on 9 May 2019).
23. Fiala, P., Krutílek, O., Pitrová, M. (2018): Evropská unie [European Union]. Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury, Brno.
24. Gereffi, G. (2005): The Global Economy: Organization, Governance, and Development. In: Smelser, N. J., Swedborg, R. (Eds.): The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Second Edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 160-182. CrossRef
25. Goda, T. (2018): The global concentration of wealth. Cambridge Journal of Economics 42(1), 95-115. CrossRef
26. Goulet, R. (2011): Cohesion Policy 2014-2020. Investing in growth and jobs. European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional Policy, Brussels.
27. Grela, M., Majchrowska, A., Michałek, T., Mućk, J., Stążka-Gawrysiak, A., Tchorek, G., Wagner, M. (2017): Is Central and Eastern Europe converging towards the EU-15? Narodowy Bank Polski, Warszawa.
28. Gros, D. (2018): Convergence in the European Union: Inside and outside the euro. Informal meeting of Economic and Financial Affairs Ministers, Sofia, Bulgaria, 27-28 April 2018.
29. Hakenes, H., Schnabel, I. (2010): The threat of capital drain: A rationale for regional public banks? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics JITE 166(4), 662-689. CrossRef
30. Hána, D. (2022): Daňové ráje v globálním geografickém pohledu [Tax havens from a global
31. geographical perspective]. Geografické rozhledy 31(4), 32-33.
32. Hána, D., Hellebrandová, L. (2018): Spatial and Sectoral Differentiation of Support to Innovative Companies from EU Funds in Czechia. European Planning Studies 26(8), 1598-1615. CrossRef
33. Harvey, D. (2010): The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. Oxford University Press, New York.
34. Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002): Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy 9(3), 436-464. CrossRef
35. Hlaváček, P., Bal-Domanska, B. (2016): Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Growth in Central and Eastern European Countries. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics 27(3), 294-303. CrossRef
36. Holubec, S. (2009): Sociologie světových systémů: hegemonie, centra, periferie [Sociology of world systems: hegemony, centers, periphery]. Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Praha.
37. Javorcik, B. S. (2004): Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review 94(3), 605-627. CrossRef
38. Jensen, N. M. (2003): Democratic governance and multinational corporations: Political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization 57(3), 587-616. CrossRef
39. Keller, J. (2017): Evropské rozpory ve světle migrace [European contradictions in the light of migration]. Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Praha.
40. Keynes, J. M. (2018): The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Palgrave Macmillan, Cambridge. CrossRef
41. Kučera, L. (2016): Odliv peněz z ČR je jeden z nejsilnějších v Unii [The outflow of money from the Czech Republic is one of the strongest in the Union]. Statistika & my 2, https://www.statistikaamy.cz/2016/02/odliv-penez-z-cr-je-jeden-z-nejsilnejsich-v-unii/ (accessed on 23 March 2019).
42. Kyriacou, A. P., Roca-Sagalés, O. (2012): The impact of EU structural funds on regional disparities within member states. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30(2), 267-281. CrossRef
43. Li, Q., Resnick, A. (2003): Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization 57(1), 175-211. CrossRef
44. Lolos, S. E. G. (2009): The effect of EU structural funds on regional growth: assessing the evidence from Greece, 1990-2005. Economic Change and Restructuring 42(3), 211-228. CrossRef
45. Magrini, S. (1999): The evolution of income disparities among the regions of the European Union. Regional Science and Urban Economics 29(2), 257-281. CrossRef
46. Mahutga, M. C., Bandelj, N. (2008): Foreign Investment and Income Inequality. The Natural Experiment of Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 49(6), 429-454. CrossRef
47. Mihaljek, D. (2018): Convergence in Central and Eastern Europe: Can All Get to EU Average? Comparative Economic Studies 60(2), 217-229. CrossRef
48. Ministry of Regional Development (2023): Drawing in the 2014-2020 period, https://dotaceeu.cz/en/statistiky-a-analyzy/cerpani-v-obdobi-2014-2020 (accessed on 29 May 2023).
49. Molle, W. (2017): The economics of European integration: theory, practice, policy. Routledge, London. CrossRef
50. Mravcová, H., Havlík, V. (2022): Pragmatism and support for the EU in Slovakia's politics. East European Politics 38(1), 123-143. CrossRef
51. Myrdal, G. (1957): Economic Theory and Under-developed Regions. Gerald Duckwords, London.
52. Nerudová, D., Dobranschi, M., Solilová, V., Litzman, M. (2023): Onshore and offshore profit shifting and tax revenue losses in the European Union. Economic Modelling (early access). CrossRef
53. Novotný, J. (2006): Negativní vlivy společensko-ekonomických nerovností a mechanismy jejich regulace: argumenty z rozvojových zemí [The Negative Aspects of Socio-economic Inequalities and Mechanisms of their Regulation: Some Arguments from Developing Countries]. Ekonomický časopis 54(7), 709-724.
54. Novotný, J., Nosek, V., Jelínek, K. (2014): EasyStat, http://web.natur.cuni.cz/~pepino/EasyStat.zip (accessed on 16 September 2019).
55. Pavlínek, P. (2022a): Relative positions of countries in the core-periphery structure of the European automotive industry. European Urban and Regional Studies 29(1), 59-84. CrossRef
56. Pavlínek, P. (2022b): Revisiting economic geography and foreign direct investment in less developed regions. Geography Compass 16(4), 1-21. CrossRef
57. Pavlínek, P., Ženka, J. (2011): Upgrading in the automotive industry: firm-level evidence from Central Europe. Journal of Economic Geography 11(3), 559-586. CrossRef
58. Piketty, T. (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. CrossRef
59. Piketty, T., Saez, E. (2014): Inequality in the long run. Science 344(6186), 838-843. CrossRef
60. Plenta, P. (2020): Conspiracy theories as a political instrument: utilization of anti-Soros narratives in Central Europe. Contemporary Politics 26(5), 512-530. CrossRef
61. Puigcerver-Peñalver, M. C. (2007): The impact of structural funds policy on European regions' growth. A theoretical and empirical approach. The European Journal of Comparative Economics 4(2), 179-208.
62. Rojíček, M., Spěváček, V., Vejmělek, J., Zamrazilová, E., Žďárek, V. (2016): Makroekonomická analýza - teorie a praxe [Macroeconomic analysis - theory and practice]. Grada, Praha.
63. Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (2002): The Disturbing "Rise" of Global Income Inequality. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge. CrossRef
64. Shahbaz, M., Nasir, M. A., Roubaud, D. (2018): Environmental degradation in France: The effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Economics 74, 843-857. CrossRef
65. Simionescu, M., Lazányi, K., Sopková, G., Dobeš, K., Balcerzak, A. P. (2017): Determinants of Economic Growth in V4 Countries and Romania. Journal of Competitiveness 9(1), 103-116. CrossRef
66. Smith, N. (2008): Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space. University of Georgia Press, Athens. CrossRef
67. Sorinel, C. (2010): Immanuel Wallerstein's World System Theory. Annals of Faculty of Economics 1(2), 220-224, http://anale.steconomiceuoradea.ro/volume/2010/n2/031.pdf (accessed on 30 January 2020).
68. Storper, M. (2018): Separate worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization. Journal of Economic Geography 18(2), 247-270. CrossRef
69. Tismaneanu, V. (2019): What Went Wrong and Why? Nationalism versus Democracy in Eastern and Western Europe. Contemporary European History 28(1), 69-72. CrossRef
70. Treaty establishing the European Economic Community (Treaty of Rome, 25 Mar 1957).
71. Tridico, P. (2018): The determinants of income inequality in OECD countries. Cambridge Journal of Economics 42(4), 1009-1042. CrossRef
72. Wallerstein, I. (2011): The Modern World-System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. University of California Press, San Francisco. CrossRef
73. Weeks, J. (2018): Free Markets and the Decline of Democracy. Review of Radical Political Economics 50(4), 637-648. CrossRef
Consequences of capital drain among EU member states is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
210 x 297 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 200 Kč
ISSN: 0300-5402
E-ISSN: 2336-1980
