We are pleased to share that the AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.6 in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2023. AUC Geographica ranks (JCI) in Q3 in Geography.
AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.
AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.
Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31
All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.
AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.
Journal metrics 2022
Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.6
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.24
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography
Cite Score: 1.1
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences
The journal is archived in Portico.
The role of social capital in empowering rural community for reducing environmental hazards: the case study of Khodabandeh, Iran
Hamid Barghi, Reza Zakerinejad
zveřejněno: 17. 05. 2023
Social capital approaches consider the empowerment of societies against disasters, which enable rural communities to recover from the negative effects of hazards. Social capital is a mediator for collective action and can help people build common property resources. Not only can social capital improve access to natural resources, it can also improve access to physical capital. Using the descriptive and analytical survey, this article analyzes the impact of social capital on managing an earthquake in the villages of Khodabandeh in northwest of Iran. The findings indicate that according to the single sample T test as well as the opinions of local authorities and household heads. The components of attitude and cohesion have the strongest direct effect on reducing vulnerability at the level of households and rural authorities, the component of trust has the strongest indirect effect, and the network component has no indirect effect on either level.
klíčová slova: social capital; disaster management; village; Khorarood village
1. Aysan, D. (2003): Architecture and Rehabilitation Planning. Translated by Falahi. Shahid Beheshti University Publications, Tehran (in Persian).
2. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B. (2008): Management of natural resources at the community level: exploring the role of social capital and leadership in a rural fishing community. World Development 36(12), 2763-2779. CrossRef
3. Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED). EM-DAT (2020): The International Disaster Database. Available online: https://www.emdat.be.
4. Chou, Y. K. (2006): Three simple models of social capital and economic growth. Journal of Socio-Economics 35(5), 889-912. CrossRef
5. CRED UNISDR (2018): Economic Losses, Poverty and Disasters 1998-2017. The Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED): Brussels, Belgium. CrossRef
6. Falk, I., Kilpatrick, S. (2005): What is social capital? A study of interaction of rural communities. Sociologia Ruralis 40(1), 87-110. CrossRef
7. Flora, J. L. (2011): Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology 6(3), 481-506. CrossRef
8. Hamzezade, H., Mahood, M. (2009): Estimation of coda wave attenuation in east central Iran. Journal of Seismology 13, 125-139. CrossRef
9. Kaljee, L., Chen, X. (2011): Social capital and risk and protective behaviors: a global health perspective. Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 2, 113-122. CrossRef
10. Kamranzad, F., Memarian, H., Zare, M. (2020): Earthquake risk assessment for Tehran, Iran. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9(7), 430. CrossRef
11. OECD (2018): Financial Management of Earthquake Risk; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD): Paris, France. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/finance/insurance/Financial-management-of-earthquake-risk.pdf.
12. Payanifar, N., Sedaghatzadegan, S., Mousavi, M., Rafiey, H. (2022): The role of social indicators in institutional interactions (case study: charities and the Imam Khomeini Relief Foundation in Iran). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran 11(2), 545-567. CrossRef
13. Roth, F. (2022): Social capital, trust, and economic growth. Intangible Capital and Growth, 167-185. In Contributions to Economics. Springer. CrossRef
14. Shaikh, M. K., Islam, M. S. (2016): Community capitals as community resilience to climate change: conceptual connections. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13(12), 1211. CrossRef
15. Sharafi, L., Zarafshani, K. (2011): Vulnerability assessment, the starting point for risk management in droughts. Regional Planning Periodical 1(1) (in Persian).
16. Shayan, M. Raisi, M. K., Mohammadi, M. (2017): Investigating the impact of social capital on improving the economic indicators in villages of Zarindshahr. Haft Hessar Journal of Environmental Studies 24(6), 18-37. Available online: http://hafthesar.iauh.ac.ir/article-1-567-en.html.
17. Siegel, S., Castellan Jr, N. J. (1988): Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Sonboli, Z., Jalali, M. and Z. Parvaneh. (2021): Analyzing the impact of the social capital on the performance of rural municipalities (case study: Sonqor and Kolyai County). Journal of Research and Rural Planning 10(4), 101-116. CrossRef
19. Stone, W. (2001): Measuring social capital: towards a theoretically informed measurement framework for researching social capital in family and community life, 54-67. Australian Institute of Family Research Paper No. 24.
20. Sutanta, H., Rajabifard, A., Bishop, I. D. (2010): Integrating spatial planning and disaster risk reduction at the local level in the context of spatially enabled government. In: GSDI 12 World Conference: Realizing Spatially Enabled Societies, Singapore. Available online: http://gsdiassociation.org/images/gsdi12/80.pdf.
21. UN (2015): Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; United Nations (UN): Geneva, Switzerland.
22. UNISDR (2008): United Nations International Strategy for Disaster reduction. Links between disaster risk reduction, development and climate change; A briefing for Sweden's Commission on Climate Change and Development, Geneva. www.unisdr.org.
23. Woodhouse, A. (2006): Social capital and economic development in regional Australia: A case study. Journal of Rural Studies 22(1), 83-94. CrossRef
24. Xue, L. (2008): Social Capital and Employment Entry of Recent Immigrants to Canada, Evidence from the Longitudinal Survey of Immigrants to Canada (LSIC). Available online: https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/publications-manuals/social-capital-employment-entry-recent-immigrants-canada.html.
The role of social capital in empowering rural community for reducing environmental hazards: the case study of Khodabandeh, Iran is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
210 x 297 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 200 Kč