We are pleased to share that the AUC Geographica was awarded an Impact Factor of 0.6 in the 2022 Journal Citation Reports™ released by Clarivate in June 2023. AUC Geographica ranks (JCI) in Q3 in Geography.
AUC Geographica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Geographica) is a scholarly academic journal continuously published since 1966 that publishes research in the broadly defined field of geography: physical geography, geo-ecology, regional, social, political and economic geography, regional development, cartography, geoinformatics, demography and geo-demography.
AUC Geographica also publishes articles that contribute to advances in geographic theory and methodology and address the questions of regional, socio-economic and population policy-making in Czechia.
Periodical twice yearly.
Release dates: June 30, December 31
All articles are licenced under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC BY 4.0), have DOI and are indexed in CrossRef database.
AUC Geographica is covered by the following services: WOS, EBSCO, GeoBibline, SCOPUS, Ulrichsweb and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ).
The journal has been covered in the SCOPUS database since 1975 – today
https://www.scopus.com/source/sourceInfo.uri?sourceId=27100&origin=recordpage
The journal has been selected for coverage in Clarivate Analytics products and services. Beginning with V. 52 (1) 2017, this publication will be indexed and abstracted in Emerging Sources Citation Index.
The journal has been indexed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (MSHE) on the list of scientific journals recommended for authors to publish their articles. ICI World of Journals; Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Geographica.
Journal metrics 2022
Web of Science
Impact factor (JCR®): 0.6
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI): 0.24
Rank (JCI): Q3 in Geography
Scopus
Cite Score: 1.1
Rank (ASJC): Q3 in Geography, Planning and Development; Q3 in General Earth and Planetary Sciences
The journal is archived in Portico.
AUC GEOGRAPHICA, Vol 56 No 2 (2021), 144–156
Evolutionary trajectories of manufacturing firms in the rural Zlín Region of Czechia
Simona Šťastná, Adam Pavlík
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2021.8
zveřejněno: 13. 05. 2021
Abstract
The aim of this article is to identify the most important mechanisms of rural industrial development in the context of a highly industrialized peripheral region in Central Europe. We ask if the development of rural manufacturing firms is primarily based on the activity and skills of local entrepreneurs, or whether it is driven by commercial counter-urbanization or cost-motivated inflow of (foreign direct) investment from other regions. Empirical results are based on the case study of the highly industrialized peripheral Zlín Region in Czechia. We have conducted 26 interviews with the company managers in rural municipalities of the Zlín Region. The growth of rural manufacturing firms is path-dependent, usually based on pre-existing economic activities or skills in the same or technologically related local industries. Neither commercial counter-urbanization nor inflow of foreign direct investment played a major role in the development of manufacturing firms in rural municipalities of the Zlín Region.
klíčová slova: rural regions; manufacturing firms; restructuring; path development; firm births
reference (53)
1. Bartoš, J., Schulz, J., Trapl M. (1982): Historický místopis Moravy a Slezska v letech 1848-60. Vol. VIII. Ostrava: Profil.
2. Bednář, K. (1970): Rozmístění průmyslu v českých zemích na počátku 20. století (1902). Praha: Academia, vydavatelství České akademie věd.
3. Bičík, I., Jančák, V. (2005): Transformační procesy v českém zemědělství po roce 1990. Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Přírodovědecká fakulta, Katedra sociální geografie a regionálního rozvoje.
4. Bosworth, G., Finke, B. H. (2019): Commercial Counterurbanisation: A driving force in rural economic development. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 0(0), 1-21.
5. BR (2017): Business Register. Czech Statistical Office. Praha.
6. Cannarella, C., Piccioni, V. (2011): Traditiovations: Creating innovation from the past and antique techniques for rural areas. Technovation 31(12), 689-699. CrossRef
7. Carey, M. (2015): The impact of Agri-Business Processing firms on the local economy. In: 150th Seminar, October, 22-23, Edinburgh, Scotland.
8. Crone, M., Wattst, H. D. (2003): The determinants of regional sourcing by multinational manufacturing firms: evidence from Yorkshire and Humberside, UK. European Planning Studies 11(6), 717-737. CrossRef
9. Dinis, A. (2006): Rural Enterpreneurship: An Inovation and Marketing Perspective. In: Morgan, E. (Ed.) The new European rurality: strategies for small firms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
10. Egedy, T., Cerić, D., Konopski, M., et al. (2015): Entrepreneurship as a potential driving force for the further development of rural areas. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich/Rural Studies 39, 103-127. CrossRef
11. Eder, J., Trippl, M. (2019): Innovation in the periphery: Compensation and exploitation strategies. Growth and Change 50(4), 1511-1531. CrossRef
12. Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., Kyngäs, H. (2014): Qualitative Content Analysis. SAGE Open 4(1), 215824401452263. CrossRef
13. Furlan, A., Cainelli, G. (2020): Spinoffs or startups? The effects of spatial agglomeration. Industrial and Corporate Change. CrossRef
14. Gjelsvik, M., Trippl, M. (2018): Financial Organizations: An Overlooked Element in Regional Innovation Systems. In: New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems-Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, 107-125. Springer. CrossRef
15. Grillitsch, M., Trippl, M. (2016): Innovation Policies and New Regional Growth Paths: A place-based system failure framework. Papers in Innovation Studies 26, 1-23.
16. Hamalová, M. Tvrdoň, J., Žárská, E. (1996): Priestorová ekonomika. Bratislava: Ekonóm.
17. Hoggart, K., Paniagua, A. (2001): What rural restructuring? Journal of Rural Studies 17(1), 41-62. CrossRef
18. Hruška, V., Czapiewski, K. (2015): Changing rural economies: theoretical background and empirical evidence. Studia obszarów wiejskich 39, 59-76. CrossRef
19. Isaksen, A. (2014): Industrial development in thin regions: trapped in path extension? Journal of Economic Geography 15(3), 585-600. CrossRef
20. Isaksen, A., Jakobsen, S.-E., Njøs, R., et al. (2019): Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32(1), 48-65. CrossRef
21. Isaksen, A., Tödtling, F., Trippl, M. (2018): Innovation policies for regional structural change: Combining actor-based and system-based strategies. In: New Avenues for regional innovation systems: Theoretical advances, empirical cases and policy lessons, 221-238. Springer. CrossRef
22. Isaksen, A., Trippl, M. (2017): Exogenously led and policy-supported new path development in peripheral regions: Analytical and synthetic routes. Economic Geography 93(5), 436-457. CrossRef
23. Jančák, V., Eretová, V., Hrabák, J. (2019): The Development of Agriculture in Czechia After the Collapse of the Eastern Bloc in European Context. In: Bański, J. ed. Three Decades of Transformation in the East-Central European Countryside. Cham: Springer, 55-71. CrossRef
24. Kalantaridis, C. (2005): Global Integration and the Industrialization of the Countryside. In: Schmied, D. ed. Winning and Losing. The Changing Geography of Europe's Rural Areas. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Kilkenny, M. (2010): Urban/regional economics and rural development. Journal of Regional Science 50(1), 449-470. CrossRef
26. Kunc, J. (2006): Historie a současnost průmyslové výroby na Moravě - regionální aspekty ekologického ohrožení krajiny. Národohospodářský obzor 13, 42-49.
27. Květoň, V., Blažek, J. (2018): Path-development trajectories and barriers perceived by stakeholders in two Central European less developed regions: narrow or broad choice? European Planning Studies 26, 2058-2077. CrossRef
28. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review 65(3), 682-693. CrossRef
29. Martin, R., Sunley, P. (2006): Path dependence and regional economic evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 6(4), 395-438. CrossRef
30. Maskell, P., Malberg A. (1999): Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23, 165-185. CrossRef
31. Maskell, P., Malmberg, A. (2007): Myopia, knowledge development and cluster evolution. Journal of Economic Geography 7(5), 603-618. CrossRef
32. Mayer, H., Habersetzer, A., Meili, R. (2016): Rural-urban linkages and sustainable regional development: the role of entrepreneurs in linking peripheries and centers. Sustainability 8(8), 745. CrossRef
33. North, D. (1998): Rural industrialization. In: Ilbery, B. ed. The Geography of Rural Change, 161-188. London: Routledge.
34. Perkmann, M. (2006). Extraregional Linkages and the Territorial Embeddedness of Multinational Branch Plants: Evidence from the South Tyrol Region in Northeast Italy. Economic Geography 82(4), 421-441. CrossRef
35. Pileček, J., Jančák, V. (2010): Je možné měřit sociální kapitál? Analýza územní diferenciace okresů Česka. Geografie-Sborník ČGS 115(1), 78-95. CrossRef
36. Píša, J. (2020): Shluková analýza: cesta k odhalení podnikatelské migrace na venkov? Cluster analysis: the way to revealing rural entreprenneurial in migration? Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344452196_shlukova_analyza_cesta_k_odhaleni_podnikatelske_migrace_na_venkov.
37. Píša, J., Hruška, V. (2019): Entrepreneurial in-migration and rural development in Czechia: A challenge of integrating the local and extra-local in rural planning. Geographia Polonica 92(3), 347-383. CrossRef
38. Rumpel, P. (2011): Komplexní regionální marketing periferního rurálního regionu Jesenicko. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
39. Seawnght, J., Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2), 294-308. CrossRef
40. Slach, O. (2011): Průmysl. In: Rumpel, P. Boruta, T., Slach, O., et al.: Komplexní regionální marketing periferního rurálního regionu Jesenicko, 95-123. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk.
41. Slach, O., Rumpel, P., Koutský, J. (2013): Profilace měkkých faktorů regionálního rozvoje. Ostrava (Accendo-Centrum pro vědu a výzkum).
42. Sonn, J. W., Lee, D. (2012): Revisiting the branch plant syndrome: Review of literature on foreign direct investment and regional development in Western advanced economies. International Journal of Urban Sciences 16(3), 243-259. CrossRef
43. Trippl, M., Grillitsch, M., Isaksen, A. (2018): Exogenous sources of regional industrial change: Attraction and absorption of non-local knowledge for new path development. Progress in Human Geography 42(5), 687-705. CrossRef
44. Vaz, T., Morgan, E., Nijkamp, P. (2006): Rural Europe and Small Firms: A Strategic Positioning and Synthesis. In: Morgan, E. ed. The new European rurality: strategies for small firms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
45. Vernon, R. (1966): International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 190-207. CrossRef
46. Vaishar, A., Šťastná, M. (2019): Development of the Czech Countryside After 1990: Causes and Consequences. In: Bański, J. ed. Three Decades of Transformation in the East-Central European Countryside, 9-116. Cham: Springer. CrossRef
47. Wiggins, S., Protctor, S. (2001): How Special Are Rural Areas? The Economic Implications of Location for Rural Development. Development Policy Review 19(4), 427-436. CrossRef
48. Woods, M. (2005): Rural geography: processes, responses and experiences in rural restructuring. London: Sage Publication.
49. Woods, M. (2013): Regions engaging globalization: A typology of regional responses in rural Europe. Journal of Rural and Community Development 8(3), 113-126.
50. Zoričák, M., Horváth, D., Gazda, V., et al. (2021): Spatial evolution of industries modelled by cellular automata. Journal of Business Research 129, 580-588. CrossRef
51. Ženka, J., Novotný, J., Slach, O., et al. (2015): Industrial specialization and economic performance: A case of Czech microregions. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography 69(2), 67-79. CrossRef
52. Ženka, J., Novotný, J., Slach, O., et al. (2017): Spatial distribution of knowledge-intensive business services in a small post-communist economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 8(2), 385-406. CrossRef
53. Ženka, J., Šťastná, S., Pavlík, A. (2021): The role of the manufacturing industry in the development of rural regions: evidence from a highly industrialized Moravian region. Moravian Geographical Reports 29(1), 39-52. CrossRef
Evolutionary trajectories of manufacturing firms in the rural Zlín Region of Czechia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
210 x 297 mm
vychází: 2 x ročně
cena tištěného čísla: 200 Kč
ISSN: 0300-5402
E-ISSN: 2336-1980
