ORBIS SCHOLAE
ORBIS SCHOLAE

We inform authors and readers that, following an agreement with the Karolinum publishing house, from 2024 (Volume 18), the journal Orbis scholae will be published only in electronic form.

Orbis scholae is an academic journal published by Charles University, Prague. It features articles on school education in the wider socio-cultural context. It aims to contribute to our understanding and the development of school education, and to the reflection of teaching practice and educational policy.

The journal is indexed in SCOPUS, CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO, and ERIH Plus.

ORBIS SCHOLAE, Vol 9 No 2 (2015), 139–144

Video-Based Reflection on Teaching: What Makes It Effective?

Niels Brouwer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2015.84
published online: 01. 02. 2018

abstract

Since the beginning of the new millennium, the use of digital video for teacher education and professional development (PD) has grown into a burgeoning and exciting field of research and development (R&D). The collection of empirical studies in this special issue clearly exemplifies this trend. I will begin this comment by pointing out the societal relevance of developments in this field. Then I will discuss the nature of the findings of the six studies and their implications for the design of video interventions as well as for theory and research.

references (29)

1. Berson, E., Borko, H., Million, S., Khachatryan, E., & Glennon, K. (2015). Practice what you teach: A video-based practicum model of professional development for elementary science teachers. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 35−53.

2. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and teacher education, 24(2), 417−436. CrossRef

3. Borko, H., Jacobs, & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Volume 7 (pp. 548−556). Oxford: Elsevier.

4. Brouwer, C. N. (2010). Determining long-term effects of teacher education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education, Volume 7 (pp. 503−510). Oxford: Elsevier. CrossRef

5. Brouwer, C. N. (2011). Equipping teachers visually. Zoetermeer: Kennisnet. Available from http://www.kennisnet.nl/onderzoek/alle-onderzoeken/equipping-teachers-visually

6. Brouwer, C. N. (2014). Was lernen Lehrpersonen durch die Arbeit mit Videos? Ergebnisse eines Dezenniums empirischer Forschung [Visual Teacher Learning: Review of a Decade of Research]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 32(2), 176−196.

7. Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181−199. CrossRef

8. Fortkamp, J. T. J., & Berg, E. van den (2005). Leraren in beeld. Literatuurstudie naar de mogelijkheden voor coöperatief leren van beroepsvaardigheden met behulp van digitale video in een hypermedia omgeving [Teachers in view. Literature study of the possibilities for cooperative learning of professional competencies using digital video in a hypermedia environment]. Eindhoven/Enschede: Fontys/Universiteit Twente.

9. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41−67. CrossRef

10. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5−12. CrossRef

11. Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

12. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. A Synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.

13. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.

14. Kersting, N., Givvin, K., Thompson, B., Santagata, R., & Stigler, J. (2012). Measuring usable knowledge: Teachers' analyses of mathematics classroom videos predict teaching quality and student learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 568−589. CrossRef

15. Kleinknecht, M., & Schneider, J. (2013). What do teachers think and feel when analyzing videos of themselves and other teachers teaching? Teaching and Teacher Education, 33, 13−23. CrossRef

16. Krammer, K., Hugener, I., Frommelt, M., Fürrer Auf der Maur, G., & Biaggi, S. (2015). Casebased learning in initial teacher education: Assessing the benefits and challenges of working with student videos and other teachers' videos. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 119−137.

17. Korthagen, F. A. J., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory. The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking university teaching. A framework or the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.

19. Matsumura, L., Garnier, H., & Spybrook, J. (2013). Literacy coaching to improve student reading achievement: A multi-level mediation model. Learning and Instruction, 25, 35−48. CrossRef

20. Minaříková, E., Píšová, M., Janík, T., & Uličná, K. (2015). Video clubs: EFL teachers' selective attention before and after. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 55−75.

21. Mohr, S., & Santagata, R. (2015). Changes in pre-service teachers' beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning during teacher preparation and effects of video-enhanced analysis of practice. Orbis scholae, 9(2), 103−117.

22. OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD. Available from www.oecd.org/edu/teacherpolicy.

23. Pehmer, A.-K., Groeschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). How teacher professional development regarding classroom dialogue affects students' higher-order learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 108−119. CrossRef

24. Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. (2011). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective science PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 117−148. CrossRef

25. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 133−145. CrossRef

26. Schindler, A.-K., Groeschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2015). Teaching science effectively: A case study on student verbal engagement in classroom dialogue. Orbis scholae, 9(2, 9−34).

27. Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., & Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In K. Van Veen, R. Zwart, & J. Meirink (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3−21). London: Routledge.

28. Vondrová, N., & Žalská, J. (2015). Ability to notice mathematics specific phenomena: What exactly do student teachers attend to? Orbis scholae, 9(2), 77−101.

29. West, L., & Staub, F.C. (2003). Content-Focused Coaching: Transforming mathematics lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Creative Commons License
Video-Based Reflection on Teaching: What Makes It Effective? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

157 x 230 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk
ISSN: 1802-4637
E-ISSN: 2336-3177

Download