Orbis scholae is an academic journal published by Charles University, Prague. It features articles on school education in the wider socio-cultural context. It aims to contribute to our understanding and the development of school education, and to the reflection of teaching practice and educational policy.
ORBIS SCHOLAE, 1–20
Communication as a Means of Development in a School with a High Percentage of Foreign Pupils
Denisa Denglerová, Martina Kurowski, Radim Šíp
announced: 14. 02. 2020
The text presented is a case study of one specific school in the Czech Republic, where many pupils with migrant backgrounds are concentrated. On the theoretical level, the study is based on experiential epistemology, which emphasizes interactions over the states and essences of actors or environments. This approach enables researchers to put the Bronfenbrenner’s model of the ecological system in a broader context of Chicago School (interactions) and Palo Alto School (communication). Bronfenbrenner’s concept of the mesosystem (in our case of the school) draw attention to the importance of communication and to specify three significant themes. The themes detect conditions that support and deepen the self/development of all actors involved (pupils, teachers, management, parents, etc.). In the methodological part, the themes have used as the frame for the frame analysis. In this way, the data collected in the school by observations, field notes, interviews are analysed. Although there are not many such schools like the one the authors research, they play an essential role in the integration of migrants into Czech society. That is the reason why the authors can discuss the outcomes of the study in a broader context and offer specific recommendations for state policies on the migrants’ inclusion.
keywords: experientialist epistemology; Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model; mesosystem; communication; education; inclusion policy; migrants
1. Appa, V. A. (2005). Study on how asylum seekers and refugees access education in four local authorities in England. London: National Children's Bureau.
2. Barša, P. (2011). Orientálcova vzpoura [The Oriental rebellion]. Prague: Dokořán.
3. Bennett, M. J. (2009). Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: a conceptual introduction to the Intercultural Education double supplement. Intercultural Education, 20(1), 1−13. CrossRef
4. Bennett, M. (2013). Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Paradigms, principles, & practices. Boston: Intercultural Press.
5. Berry, J. W. (2006). Contexts of acculturation. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 27−42). New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge (MA), London: Harvard University Press.
7. Cassity, E., & Gow, G. (2005). Making up for lost time: The experiences of Southern Sudanese young refugees in high schools. Youth Studies Australia, 24(3), 51−55.
8. Český statistický úřad. (2019). Data − počty cizinců. Available from: https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/4−ciz_pocet_cizincu#cr
9. Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. San Diego: College Hill.
10. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. CrossRef
11. Damasio, A. (2018). The Strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. New York: Pantheon Books.
12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.
13. Dewey, J. (1939). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
14. Dewey, J. (1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publicating.
15. Dewey, J., & Bentley, Arthur F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: Beacon Press.
16. Dockett, S., Perry, B., & Kearney, E. (2012). Family transitions as children start school. Family Matters, 90, 57−67.
17. Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1997). Life cycle completed. Extended version with new chapters on ninth stage of development. New York: W. W. Norton.
18. EURYDICE. (2004). Integrating Immigrant Children into Schools in Europe. Brussel: Euridyce.
19. Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships in teachers' professional work. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(3), 397−406. CrossRef
20. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., & Falik, L. H. (2010). Beyond smarter − mediated learning and the brain's capacity for change. New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Hamilton, R. J., & Moore, D. (2004). Educational interventions for refugee children: Theoretical perspectives and implementing best practice. London: Routledge Falmer. CrossRef
22. Hayes, N., O'Toole, L., & Halpenny, A. M. (2017). A Guide for practitioners and students in early years education. London: Routledge.
23. Hek, R. (2005). The role of education in the settlement of young refugees in the UK: The experience of young refugees. Practice, 17(3), 157−171. CrossRef
24. Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
25. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossRef
26. MacCullum, D. (2009). Newcomer orientation week in Ontario high schools. INSCAN (International Settlement Canada), 23(2), 3−4.
27. Montgomery J. R. (1996). Components of refugee adaptation. International Migration Review, 30(3), 679−702. CrossRef
28. Noiriel, G. (2012). Úvod do historické sociologie [Introduction to historical sociology]. Prague: Slon.
29. Sidhu, R., & Taylor S. (2007). Educational provision for refugee youth in Australia: Left to chance? Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 283−300. CrossRef
30. Srivastava, A., & Thomson, S. B. (2009). Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research. JOAAG, 4(2), 72−79.
31. Super, Ch. M., & Harkness, S. (2002). Culture structures the environment for development. Human Development, 45(4), 270−274. CrossRef
32. Švec, V., Nehyba, J., Svojanovský, P. et al. (2017). Becoming a teacher: The dance between tacit and explicit knowledge. Brno: MUNIPress. CrossRef
33. UNESCO (2016). If you don't understand, how can you learn? Policy Paper, 24(1), 1−9.
34. Watzlawick, P. B., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. D. (1962). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton.
35. Yin, R. K. (2012). Case study methods. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 141−155). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Communication as a Means of Development in a School with a High Percentage of Foreign Pupils is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
published: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk