Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 65 No 1 (2019), 131–139
Názor rejstříkových soudů: odborová organizace spolkem, či raději ne?
[Registrar’s Opinion on Trade Union’s Legal Status]
Martin Štefko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2019.11
published online: 22. 03. 2019
abstract
This paper deals with registrar’s standards procedure when they are required to register a trade union organisation into the Registry of Associations. There is an ongoing discussion on trade union’s legal status among scholars, practitioners and even judges. Some claim they are associations, but they are opposed by trade union’s establishment and few registrars. If this happens those trade unions are denied the entry to the register, what has been meanwhile overruled by upper courts, or they are required to change their name deleting the term “association” thereof.
keywords: Trade Union; Association; Registry of Associations; Registrar Court
references (10)
1. J. Pichrt v komentáři k ust. § 286 in: BĚLINA, DRÁPAL a kol. Zákoník práce, komentář. 2. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2014.
2. KALENSKÁ, M. Pracovní právo v tržním hospodářství.
3. LAVICKÝ, P. a kol. Občanský zákoník I. Obecná část (§ 1−654). Komentář. 1. vydání, Praha: C. H. Beck, 2014.
4. Malý, K. Policejní a soudní perzekuce dělnické třídy v druhé polovině 19. století v Čechách. 1.vyd. Praha: Academia, 1967.
5. Pichrt, J. in: BĚLINA, M. a kol. Pracovní právo. 6. vydání. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2014.
6. Stránský, J. – SAMEK, V. – HORECKÝ, J. Nový občanský zákoník a pracovní právo. Praha: Sondy, 2014.
7. Švestka, J. – DVOŘÁK, J. – FIALA, J. a kol. Občanský zákoník. Komentář. Svazek VI. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2014.
8. TOMEŠ, I. Zaměstnanecká participace na řízení podniku. Právník. 1991, č. 5.
9. Usnesení Krajského soudu Praha č. j. 30 Co 116/2003-06-16 in: Bulletin Advokacie. 2003, č. 10.
10. VÁCHA, J. Odborové organizace v područí právní úpravy v novém občanském zákoníku. Pracovní právo. 2013, s. 2 dostupné též https://www.law.muni.cz/sborniky/pracpravo2013/files/010.html.
Názor rejstříkových soudů: odborová organizace spolkem, či raději ne? is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
