Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 65 No 1 (2019), 121–129
Vybraná specifika pracovněprávních sporů v zahraničním srovnání
[Selected specifics of labour law disputes in international comparation]
Patrik Stonjek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2019.10
published online: 22. 03. 2019
abstract
In the submitted text, the author attempts to present some chosen specifics of labour law disputes with a view to differences in court procedure. The author focuses more detailed on composition of labour courts/senates by lay judges and on their role by decision-making of labour law disputes and on financial demands of litigation of labour law disputes before courts.
keywords: labour law disputes; court procedure; lay judges; court costs
references (9)
1. Bader, P. – HOHMANN, R. – KLEIN, H. Die ehrenamtlichen Richterinnen und Richter in der Arbeits- und Sozialgerichtsbarketi. 13. neu bearbeitete und erweiterte Auflage. Heidelberg: C. F. Müller, 2012.
2. Bugerss, P. et al. The roles, resources and competencies of employee lay judges. A cross-national study of Germany, France and Geat Britain. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, 2017.
3. Hora, V. Československé právo procesní. I.–III. díl. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2010.
4. Hromada, M. Pracovněprávní spory. 1. vydání. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2015.
5. Marhold, F. – FRIEDRICH, M. Österreichisches Arbeitsrecht. 3. Auflage. Wien: Verlag Österreich, 2016.
6. MORGENWECK, J. Die Arbeitsgerichtsbarkeit in England. Frankfurt am Mein: Petr Lang, 2013.
7. Neumayr, M. – REISSNER, G. Zeller Kommentar zum Arbeitsrecht. 3. Auflage. Wien: MANZ Verlag Wien, 2018.
8. Schwab, N. – WETH, S. a kol. Kommentar zum Arbeitsgerichtsgesetz. 2 Auflage. Köln: Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt KG, 2007.
9. Winterová, A. – MACKOVÁ, A. a kol. Civilní právo procesní. První část – Řízení nalézací. Praha: Linde, 2014.
Vybraná specifika pracovněprávních sporů v zahraničním srovnání is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
