Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 63 No 4 (2017), 93–106
Polemika o strážci ústavy v kontextu současných debat o dělbě moci
[Dispute over the guardian of the constitution in the context of current debates about the separation of powers]
Pavel Ondřejek
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2017.24
published online: 20. 12. 2017
abstract
A defence of the institution of constitutional judiciary appears as an important part throughout the works of Hans Kelsen. A model of constitutional review which won recognition in the constitutions of Czechoslovakia and Austria in the 1920th was clearly inspired by that author. A question of how to overcome a tension between a legislator and constitutional courts remains very topical at present times as well. The article outlines a dispute over the guardian of the constitution between two remarkable lawyers of the pre-World War II. period – Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. Finally, the article expounds current discourse dealing with the question of position and role of constitutional courts. In the article, the author argues for judicial minimalism and passivist decision-making.
keywords: strážce ústavy, ústavní přezkum, ústavní soudy, zákonodárce, minimalismus v soudním rozhodování, soudcovský pasivismus
references (26)
1. ANTOŠ, Marek: Současné ústavní soudnictví. Nepravý dědic Hanse Kelsena? Jurisprudence, č. 2, roč. 26, 2017.
2. BELLAMY, Richard: Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defence of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
3. BICKEL, Alexander: Foreword – The Passive Virtues. Harvard Law Review, roč. 75, 1961, str. 40 – 79.
4. BICKEL, Alexander: The Least Dangerous Branch. The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. 2. vyd., New Haven, Londýn: Yale University Press, 1962.
5. BREYER, Stephen: Making Our Democracy Work. A Judge's View. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2010.
6. DYZENHAUS, David: States of Emergency. In: ROSENFELD, Michel, SAJÓ, András (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
7. ELY, John Hart: Democracy and Distrust. A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press, 1980.
8. Ferreres COMELLA, Víctor: Constitutional Courts and Democratic Values. A European Perspective. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 2009. CrossRef
9. GRINC, Jan: Přezkum ústavních zákonů v Německu a Rakousku. Jurisprudence, roč. 19, č. 1, 2010, str. 31-37.
10. HIRSCHL, Ran: Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.
11. HÜBNER MENDES, Conrado: Neither Dialogue Nor the Last Word: Deliberative Separation of Powers III. Legisprudence, roč. 1, č. 5, 2012.
12. KELSEN, Hans: Ryzí nauka právní. Metoda a základní pojmy. (překl. V. Chytil). Brno, Praha: Orbis, 1933.
13. KRAWIETZ, Werner: Hans Kelsen – Ein normativer Mastermind des Rechts und der Rechtstheorie für das 21. Jahrhundert. Rechtstheorie, roč. 38, 2007, str. 33 – 98.
14. ONDŘEJEK, Pavel: Proměny veřejného práva a jejich vliv na ochranu lidských práv. Jurisprudence, č. 3, roč. 24, 2015, s. 30 – 35.
15. PAULSON, Stanley L., PAULSON, Bonnie (eds.): Norms and Normativity. Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
16. PREUSS, Ondřej: Klauzule věčnosti (Je možné odstranit liberální demokracii?). Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2015
17. PŘIBÁŇ, Jiří, HOLLÄNDER, Pavel a kol.: Právo a dobro v ústavní demokracii. Polemické a kritické úvahy. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství, 2011.
18. SMEKAL, Hubert, POSPÍŠIL, Ivo (eds.): Soudcokracie nebo judicializace politiky: vztah práva a politiky (nejen) v časech krize. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita, 2013.
19. SUNSTEIN, Cass. Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided. The Supreme Court 1995 Term. Harvard Law Review, roč. 110, 1996.
20. TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de: Democracy in America. Sv. I. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991.
21. TUSHNET, Mark: Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2008.
22. VINX, Lars: Hans Kelsen's Theory of Law. Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
23. VINX, Lars: The Guardian of the Constitution. Hans Kelsen und Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
24. VLČEK, Eduard, SCHELLE, Karel: Dokumenty ke studiu moderních dějin státu a práva. II. díl, Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 1994.
25. WALDRON, Jeremy: The Core of the Case against Judicial Review. The Yale Law Journal, roč. 115, 2006.
26. WINTR, Jan: Principy českého ústavního práva. 3. vyd., Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2015.
Polemika o strážci ústavy v kontextu současných debat o dělbě moci is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
