PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE
PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE

Právněhistorické studie / Legal History Studies (Charles University journal; below referred to as PHS or Journal) is a scientific journal listed in the international prestigious database SCOPUS. The journal is published by Charles University in Prague under the guarantee of the Department of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It is published by the Karolinum Press. The journal focuses on the field of legal history and related topics.

Issue 1 of the Journal was published by the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences Publishing in June 1955. The Journal was initially published by the Cabinet of Legal History of the Czechoslovak Academy of Science (CSAV), later by the Institute of State and Law (CSAV) and then by the Institute of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University.

PHS is issued three times a year in April, August, and December and it presents original scientific works/papers as well as reviews, annotations and news from the scientific field of legal history. It also introduces annotated texts of a legal history nature. PHS accepts manuscripts from domestic as well as foreign authors. Manuscripts submitted by foreign authors are published in original language, namely in English, Slovak, German, French, Italian or Polish.

PHS (ISSN 0079-4929) is registered in the Czech national ISSN centre (supervised by the State Technical Library). The Journal is registered by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic according to Act No. 46/2000 Sb., on Rights and Liabilities for the Publishing of Periodicals and Change of Some Acts (Press Act), and it is allocated with registration number of periodical press MK E 18813.

PHS is an open journal and ensures open access to scientific data (Open Access). The entire content is released as open to the public on the web pages of the journal.

The journal is archived in Portico.

PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE, Vol 53 No 1 (2023), 165–180

Perduellio a sacrilegium v době římské republiky

[Perduellio and Sacrilegium in the Time of the Roman Republic]

Marie Šmejkalová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689X.2023.11
published online: 25. 07. 2023

abstract

The submitted article concerns itself with two criminal offences – perduellio and sacrilegium – in the time of the Roman Republic whilst it attempts to identify their mutual relationship leading to an intense interconnection in the period of Justinian codification. The article uses a wide range of both domestic and foreign secondary sources as well as primary sources. The first two chapters of this work focus on a thorough introduction of the two offences by analysing several contemporary cases. Furthermore, it proceeds to the actual analysis of the interrelation of the offences, using a variety of Roman law sources, such as Lex Duodecim Tabularum, Livy’s History or The Digest of Justinian and The Institutes of Justinian.

keywords: perduellio; sacrilegium; Roman public law; Roman Republic

references (33)

1. BARTOŠEK, M. Encyklopedie římského práva. 2. přepracované vydání. Praha: Academia, 1994.

2. BAUMAN, R. A. The duumviri in the Roman criminal law and in the Horatius legend. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH Wiesbaden, 1969.

3. BLAHO, P. - SKŘEJPEK, M. Iustiniani Institutiones: Justiniánské Instituce. Praha: Karolinum, 2010.

4. BURRISS, E. E. The Misuse of Sacred Things at Rome. The Classical Weekly, 1929, roč. 22, č. 14, s. 105. Dostupné na: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/4389269>. [online]. CrossRef

5. DIO, CASSIUS. Roman History. Book XXXVII. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Cassius_Dio/37*.html.>.

6. CICERO, M. T. O zákonech: latinsko-české vydání. Přel. NOVOTNÝ, M. Praha: OIKOYMENH, 2017.

7. CICERO, M. T. Řeči proti Verrovi. Praha: Odeon, 1972.

8. CICERO, M. T. - YONGE, C. D. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero. Londýn: Henry G. Bohn, 1852.

9. DĘBIŃSKI, A. Poena cullei w rzymskim prawie karnym. Prawo Kanoniczne, 2020, roč. 37, č. 3-4, s. 133. [online]. Dostupné na: <doi:10.21697/pk.1994.37.3-4.09>. CrossRef

10. Dionysius of Halicarnassus: Roman Antiquities. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Dionysius_of_Halicarnassus/home.html>.

11. FAWLER, W. W. The religious experience of the Roman people, from the earliest times to the age of Augustus: The Gifford lectures for 1909-10 delivered in Edinburgh University. Londýn: Macmillan and Co., 1911.

12. FRÝDEK, M. Crimen maiestatis v neprávních pramenech - Livius, Tacitus, Ammianus Marcellinus. Časopis pro právní vědu a praxi, 2011, roč. 19, č. 3, s. 266. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://journals.muni.cz/cpvp/article/view/6333/5701>.

13. HARDY, E. G. Political and Legal Aspects of the Trial of Rabirius. The Journal of Philology, 2015. [online]. Dostupné na: <doi:10.1017/CBO9781139523875.002>.

14. HAYDN, J. Dictionary Of Dates, Relating To All Ages And Nations: For Universal Reference. Londýn: Edward Moxon and Co., 1861.

15. HEITLAND, W. E. Pro C. Rabirio [perduellionis reo] oratio ad Quirites. Cambridge: University Press, 1882.

16. JOŃCA, M. The Scope of exilium voluntarium in the Roman Republic. 2009. [online]. Dostupné na: <http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12153/1920>.

17. KINCL, J. - SKŘEJPEK, M. - URFUS, V. Římské právo. Praha: C. H. Beck, 1995.

18. KINCL, J. - KINDL, V. - SKŘEJPEK, M. Deset slavných procesů Marka Tullia. Praha: C. H. Beck, 1997.

19. KOŁODKO, P. Ustawodawstwo rzymskie w sprawach karnych: Od ustawy XII Tablic do dyktatury Sulli. Białystok: Temida 2, 2012.

20. KÖSTER, I. K. How to Kill a Roman Villain: The Deaths of Quintus Pleminius. The Classical Journal, 2014, roč. 109, č. 3, s. 309. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5184/classicalj.109.3.0309>. CrossRef

21. LIVIUS, T. Dějiny I. Přel. KUCHARSKÝ, P. - VRÁNEK, Č. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1979.

22. LIVIUS, T. Dějiny II-III. Přel. KUCHARSKÝ, P. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1972.

23. LIVIUS, T. Dějiny V. Přel. KUCHARSKÝ, P. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1975.

24. LIVIUS, T. Dějiny VII. HUSOVÁ, M. - KUCHARSKÝ, P. Praha: Nakladatelství Svoboda, 1979.

25. RICHARDSON, J. The Purpose of the Lex Calpurnia de Repetundis. The Journal of Roman Law Studies, 1987, roč. 77, s. 7. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/300571>. CrossRef

26. SANTALUCIA, B. Studi di diritto penale romano. Roma: Erma di Bretschneider, 1994.

27. SEAGER, R. Lex Varia de Maiestate. Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 1967, roč. 16, č. 1, s. 37. [online]. Dostupné na: <http://www.jstor.com/stable/4434965>.

28. SKŘEJPEK, M. - BLAHO P. - VAŇKOVÁ J. Digesta seu Pandectae / Digesta neboli Pandekty. Fragmenta selecta / Vybrané části. Praha: Karolinum, 2016.

29. SKŘEJPEK, M. - KINDL, V. - ŠEBOR, V. Prameny římského práva: Fontes iuris romani. 2. vydání. Praha: LexisNexis, 2004.

30. SKŘEJPEK, M. Ius et religio: Právo a náboženství ve starověkém Římě. Pelhřimov: Vydavatelství 999, 1999.

31. SKŘEJPEK, M. Římské právo v datech. Praha: C. H. Beck, 1997.

32. SKŘEJPEK, M. Římské soukromé právo: Systém a instituce. 2. upravené vydání. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2016.

33. TYRELL, W. B. The Trial of C. Rabirius in 63 B.C. Latomus, 1973, roč. 32, č. 2, s. 288. [online]. Dostupné na: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41528650>.

Creative Commons License
Perduellio a sacrilegium v době římské republiky is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

240 x 170 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 250 czk
ISSN: 0079-4929
E-ISSN: 2464-689X

Download