AUC Philologica (Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica) is an academic journal published by Charles University. It publishes scholarly articles in a large number of disciplines (English, German, Greek and Latin, Oriental, Romance and Slavonic studies, as well as in phonetics and translation studies), both on linguistic and on literary and cultural topics. Apart from articles it publishes reviews of new academic books or special issues of academic journals.
The journal is indexed in CEEOL, DOAJ, EBSCO, and ERIH PLUS.
AUC PHILOLOGICA, Vol 2020 No 4 (2020), 153–168
Les anglicismes français relatifs au cinéma : entre la terminologie, les recommendations officielles et l’usage
[French Anglicisms Related to Cinema: Between Terminology, Official Recommendations and Usage]
Weronika Woźniak
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2021.8
published online: 11. 08. 2021
abstract
The complex terminology of cinematography, where French and foreign terms meet and compete, reflects the nature of this domain, which is the area of international cooperation, of the exchange of thoughts and expression. In order to avoid the compulsory usage of foreign nomenclature, the creation and distribution of French equivalents have become the assignment of institutions such as the Commission d’enrichissement de la langue française and l’Académie française. Despite the development of indigenous terminology in the field of cinema, which is strongly associated with the international film industry, especially the American one, the circulation of Anglicisms remains significant. The objective of this article is to study English terms in the aforementioned domain. Therefore, firstly, the official recommendations of the Commission d’enrichissement de la langue française and l’Académie française for the employment of French terms in the field of cinema are presented. The second part constitute the analysis of the presence of English terms from the corpus, such as casting, flashback, steadicam, trailer, in contemporary French dictionaries, in relation to the official recommendations of the aforementioned institutions. Finally, we focus on the presence of Anglicisms and their French equivalents in French journalistic discourse on the example of the common press, in order to study the circulation of loans words and to examine whether they are actually substituted by notions of French terminology.
keywords: loan words; cinematography; terminology; journalistic discourse
references (19)
1. Chadelat, J.-M. (1996) : « Pour une sociolinguistique de l'emprunt lexical : l'exemple des emprunts français en anglais ». Cahiers de l'APLIUT, vol. 15, numéro 4, 1996. pp. 16-27. CrossRef
2. Giraud, J. (1967) : « Terminologie du cinéma » Meta 12 (4) pp.118-124, <https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/002919ar>, consulté le 30.04.20.
3. Pergnier, M. (1989) : Les anglicismes. Paris : Presses Universitaires de France.
4. Petiot, G. (1987) : « Le cinéma américain et la langue française », Meta 32 (3) pp. 299-305. CrossRef
5. Rapport annuel 2018 de la Commission d'enrichissement de la langue française
6. Saugera, V. (2017) : « La fabrique des anglicismes », Travaux de linguistique 2 (75), pp.59-79, <https://www.cairn.info/revue-travaux-de-linguistique-2017-2-page-59.html.>, consulté le 02.03.20.
7. Winter-Froemel, E. (2009) : « Les emprunts linguistiques : enjeux théoriques et perspectives nouvelles », Neologica, 3, p. 79-122.
8. http://www.academie-francaise.fr
9. http://www.atilf.fr/tlfi .
10. http://www.culture.fr/franceterme
11. http://www.europresse.com
12. http://www.granddictionnaire.com.
13. http://www.linfodrome.com
14. https://apprendre-le-cinema.fr
15. https://www.cnrtl.fr.
16. https://www.culture.gouv.fr
17. https://www.francetvinfo.fr
18. https://www.larousse.fr.
19. <bez popisu>
Les anglicismes français relatifs au cinéma : entre la terminologie, les recommendations officielles et l’usage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 150 czk
ISSN: 0567-8269
E-ISSN: 2464-6830
