Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 70 No 3 (2024), 187–200
Problematika nepomenovaných zmlúv v občianskom práve a ich uzatváranie s pohľadom de lege ferenda
[Problems of Unnamed Contracts in Civil Law and Their Conclusion with a De Lege Ferenda Perspective]
Erika Dubajová Javúreková
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2024.145
published online: 10. 09. 2024
abstract
One of the key branches of private law is the law of contractual obligations. In addition to innominate contracts, which are most often used in practice, a category of innominate contracts and a special category was created, the category of so-called mixed contracts. In practice, innominate contracts are a tool frequently used to anchor contractual relationships in all spheres of life. The institution of innominate contracts is not a new one; it is based on the principle of dispositional autonomy, which is known to have already existed in ancient Roman law. In the Slovak Republic, there are two codes, one specifically regulating civil law and the other regulating commercial law. Civil law in the Slovak Republic is regulated in the Civil Code, which regulates the natural persons’ mutual rights and obligations. In contrast, commercial law, which is regulated separately in the Commercial Code, regulates the mutual rights and obligations of legal persons, and the rights and obligations that exist between natural persons and legal persons. This means that the institution of innominate contracts is found in the Slovak Republic not only in civil law but also in commercial law, i.e., in two legal codes, when the subjects of obligation-law relations are dependent on the use of analogy-based legal reasoning due to the absence of contractual types when regulating the rights and obligations of the various subjects of their obligations.
keywords: private law; innominate contracts; freedom of contract; analogy
references (14)
1. FEKETE, I. Občiansky zákonník: komentár. Bratislava: Epos, 2007.
2. FIALA a kol. Občianske právo hmotné. 3. vyd. Brno: Masarykova univerzita – Doplněk, 2003.
3. LAZAR, J. a kol. Občianske právo hmotné 2. Bratislava: IURA EDITION, 2010.
4. MAREK, M. Smluvní obchodní právo. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 2006.¨
5. Nález Ústavného súdu Slovenskej republiky. sp. zn. I. ÚS 242/07 zo dňa 3. júla 2008.
6. OVEČKOVÁ, O. – ŽITŇANSKÁ, L. a kol. Základy obchodného práva. Bratislava: IURAEDITION, 2010.
7. Rozsudok Najvyššieho súdu Slovenskej republiky. sp. zn. 5 Cdo 39/2003 zo dňa 29. mája 2003.
8. Rozsudok Okresného súdu Galanta sp. zn. 10C/43/2018 zo dňa 11. marca 2019.
9. SUCHOŽA, J. Obchodné právo. Bratislava: IURA EDITION, 2010.
10. ŠILHÁN, J. Inominátní smlouvy a přípustnost analogie v obchodních záväzkových vztazích. Právní rozhledy. 2007, č. 13, s. 468.
11. Uznesenie Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky sp. zn. 1Cdo/167/2018 zo dňa 26. februára 2020.
12. Zákon č. 40/1964 Z. z. občiansky zákonník v znení neskorších predpisov.
13. Zákon č. 264/2022 Z. z. o mediálnych službách a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov (zákon o mediálnych službách).
14. Zákon č. 147/2001 Z. z. o reklame a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov.
Problematika nepomenovaných zmlúv v občianskom práve a ich uzatváranie s pohľadom de lege ferenda is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
