AUC IURIDICA
AUC IURIDICA

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.

Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.

The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.

AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.

The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).

The journal is archived in Portico.

–––

We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.

AUC IURIDICA, Vol 68 No 2 (2022), 81–90

Právní jednání rodiče při správě jmění dítěte aneb jak otočit podstatu a účel zákona o 180°

[A Parent’s Legal Acting in Administration Child’s Assets and Debts, or How to Reverse the Principle and Purpose of the Law]

Michaela Zuklínová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.19
published online: 02. 06. 2022

abstract

The administration of the child’s assets and debts as a part of parental responsibility is one of the important duties and rights of parents, as well as the duty and the right of the legal representation of the child. This article is trying to compare the original legal text of the relevant law, i.e., the article 898 of the Czech Civil Code (at the time of the codification of the Civil Code) and new legal text (when law No. 192/2021 has novelized the provision in question). The problem/question in the protection of the property rights of a child is researched above all. Several legal acts of parents (as the legal guardians of a child) need the court’s approval. According to the original law, a parent’s legal act without the court’s approval has been refused. Is it was watched as a legal nothing (putative act or no-act). In the view of constitutional law, this way of protecting a child was the maximum possible choice. But the new law has diminished the protection to the minimum, because now such imperfect parent’s legal act may be declared invalid by a court only if the child (or another person) invokes the invalidity (voidable act), and – above all – if the legal act has no harmful consequence for the child, a court does not have to declare the invalidity of such legal act at all.

keywords: parental responsibility; administration of child’s assets and duties; legal act of the parents; court’s approval; putative act; invalid act

references (11)

1. DOBROVOLNÁ, E. § 36: Omezení způsobilosti samostatně právně jednat u nezletilého. In: LAVICKÝ, P. a kol. Občanský zákoník I: obecná část (§ 1-654): komentář [online]. 2. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2021 [cit. 2022-03-04]. Dostupné na: https://www.beck-online.cz.

2. DVOŘÁK, B. in: MELZER, F. - TÉGL, P. a kol. Občanský zákoník: velký komentář. Svazek I, § 1-117. Praha: Leges, 2013, s. 455-458.

3. ELIÁŠ, J. - RUBEŠ, J. in: ČEŠKA, Z. - KABÁT, J. - ONDŘEJ, J. a kol. Občanský zákoník: komentář. I. svazek. Praha: Panorama, 1987, s. 192 a násl.

4. ELIÁŠ, K. K pojetí dispozitivního práva v občanském zákoníku. Bulletin advokacie. 2015, roč. 45, č. 9, s. 13-24.

5. FRINTOVÁ, D. - FRINTA, O. Svéprávnost v občanském zákoníku a její recentní vývoj. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica. 2022, Vol. VXVIII, č. 2, s. 27-34.

6. KOTRADY, P. Zásadní změny v právní úpravě péče o jmění dítěte. Právo a rodina. 2022, roč. 24, č. 1, s. 7-12.

7. MELZER, F. in: MELZER, F. - TÉGL, P. a kol. Občanský zákoník: velký komentář. Svazek III, § 419-654. Praha. Leges, 2014, s. 774 a násl., 784 a násl.

8. PSUTKA, J. Péče o jmění nezletilého dítěte. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2021.

9. ŠVESTKA, J. in: ŠVESTKA J. - SPÁČIL, J. - ŠKÁROVÁ, M. a kol. Občanský zákoník I: § 1-459: komentář. 2. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2009, s. 298 a násl.

10. ŠVESTKA J. - DVOŘÁK, J. a kol. Občanské právo hmotné 1. 5. jubilejní aktual. vyd. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2009.

11. ZUKLÍNOVÁ, M. in: ŠVESTKA, J. - DVOŘÁK, J. - FIALA, J. a kol. Občanský zákoník: komentář. Svazek I (§ 1 až 654). 2. vyd. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 2020, s. 1349-1390.

Creative Commons License
Právní jednání rodiče při správě jmění dítěte aneb jak otočit podstatu a účel zákona o 180° is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478

Download