Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 67 No 3 (2021), 49–55
Vedoucí zaměstnanec a výklad zákonných ustanovení contra verba legis
[Managing Employees and Interpretation of Legal Provisions contra Verba Legis]
Vojtěch Hanzal, Jakub Tomšej
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2021.24
published online: 13. 09. 2021
abstract
The article deals with the way legislation defines the term “senior employee” and how the interpretation is influenced by recent case law of the Constitutional Court. The first part of the article focuses on an analysis of the legal term “senior employee” in accordance with the present legislation as well as relevant judicature and doctrine. The second part of the article is based on a description of the way the Constitutional Court deviated from the interpretation of mentioned term and its aspects which were until then, considered defining. The article continues in the third section with the presentation of other examples of decision making contra verba legis throughout the judicial system of Czech Republic. The aforementioned sections are followed by the fourth part, which consists of a conclusion of the previous content and brings deliberations de lege ferenda.
keywords: senior employee; labour law; interpretation contra verba legis
references (16)
1. BĚLINA, M. - PICHRT, J. a kol. Pracovní právo. 7. dopl. a podstatně přepr. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2017.
2. BĚLINA, M. a kol. Zákoník práce: komentář. 3. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2019. Velké komentáře.
3. MELZER, F. Metodologie nalézání práva: úvod do právní argumentace. 2. vyd. Praha: C. H. Beck, 2011
4. Nález Ústavního soudu ze dne 29. 1. 2008, sp. zn. Pl. ÚS 72/06.
5. Nález Ústavního soudu ze dne 30. 3. 2010, sp. zn. Pl. ÚS 2/10.
6. PICHRT, J. Zákoník práce: zákon o kolektivním vyjednávání. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2017. Praktický komentář.
7. Rozhodnutí Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 3. 11. 2016, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 1276/2016.
8. Rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu České republiky ze dne 17. 2. 2004, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 1863/2003.
9. Rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu České republiky ze dne 19.1.2004, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 1527/2003.
10. Rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 10. 12. 2018, sp. zn. 22 Cdo 1424/2018.
11. Rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 20. 9. 2011, sp zn. 21 Cdo 4986/2010.
12. Rozsudek Nejvyššího soudu ČR ze dne 30. 01. 2018, sp. zn. 21 Cdo 5825/2016.
13. Rozsudek Nejvyššího správního soudu ze dne 30. 3. 2009, sp. zn. 4 As 1/2008.
14. TOMŠEJ, J. Pracovnělékařské služby. 2. vyd. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.
15. TOMŠEJ, J. Zdravotní nezpůsobilost zaměstnance: dva výpovědní důvody, mnoho problémů? Právní rozhledy. 2020, č. 1.
16. Usnesení Ústavního soudu ze dne 6. 12. 2016, sp. zn. I. ÚS 1077/16.
Vedoucí zaměstnanec a výklad zákonných ustanovení contra verba legis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
