Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUC Iuridica) is a legal journal published since 1955, which presents longer essays as well as short articles on topics relevant for legal theory and international, European and Czech law. It also publishes works concerning current legislative problems.
Although intended primarily for domestic audience, AUC Iuridica is useful also for foreign experts, who can take advantage of summaries in foreign languages (English, German and French) and key words, which are systematically added to the main articles and essays.
The published articles are subject to peer reviews. If necessary, reviewed texts are sent back to the author for revision.
AUC Iuridica accepts contributions from any contributor on any current legal topic.
The journal is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries).
The journal is archived in Portico.
–––
We are pleased to inform you that the journal Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database SCOPUS. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite SCOPUS database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 66 No 1 (2020), 69–76
Dočasnost zákona jako hodnota chtěná a nechtěná
[Temporality ot the Law as a Wanted and Unwanted Value]
Michal Říha
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2020.4
published online: 06. 03. 2020
abstract
Durability and stability of law are values always considered to be inherently connected with principles of good lawmaking. The main reason for this understanding is that they are condition for fairness of law and equality before the court of law. If same situations are decided differently it would mean that fundaments of law itself as a system are endangered. However modern times bring opposite problem – what if different situations are decided the same due to the fact, that factual situation changed but the legislation remained unchanged? The main issue of this paper is covering this problem which shows that even the basic postulates of law sometimes need to be questioned.
keywords: rule of law; temporality; Smart Regulation
references (15)
1. ACEMOGLU, D.- ROBINSON, J. A. Proč státy selhávají: kořeny moci, prosperity a chudoby. Praha: Argo, 2015.
2. CORKIN, J. Constitutionalism in 3D: Mapping and Legitimating Our Lawmaking Underworld. European Law Journal. 2013, 19(5). CrossRef
3. DANČÁK, B.- ŠIMÍČEK, V. eds. Deset let Listiny základních práv a svobod v právním řádu České republiky a Slovenské republiky. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Mezinárodní politologický ústav, 2001. Sborníky.
4. LAMOUROUX, S. La codification ou la démocratisation du droit. Revue française de droit constitutionnel, 2001/4 (48). CrossRef
5. LESAFFER, R. European legal history: a cultural and political perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. CrossRef
6. MAJONE, G. From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy. 1997, 17(2). CrossRef
7. NOVOTNÝ, O. Hypertrofie práva, její aspekty a jak jí čelit. Právník. Praha: Ústav státu a práva AV ČR, 2007, 155(7).
8. RADBRUCH, G. O napětí mezi účely práva. Praha: Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
9. RANCHORDAS, S. Sunset Clauses and Experimental Regulations: Blessing or Curse for Legal Certainty? Statute Law Review. 2015, 36(1). CrossRef
10. TICHÝ, L. - HRÁDEK, J. Odpovědnost státu za legislativní újmu. Praha: Centrum právní komparatistiky Právnické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, 2012. Publikace Centra právní komparatistiky Právnické fakulty Univerzity Karlovy v Praze, 6.
11. VAN AEKEN, K. From Vision To Reality: Ex Post Evaluation of Legislation. Legisprudence. 2015, 5(1). CrossRef
12. VAN GESTEL, R. a G. VAN DIJCK. Better Regulation through Experimental Legislation. VEJVODOVÁ, A. Zákony by se měly měnit častěji. Právní rádce. 2019, (5).
13. VOERMANS, W. - MOLL, C. -FLORIJN, N. -VAN LOCHEM, P. Codification and Consolidation in the European Union: A Means to Untie Red Tape. Statute Law Review. 2008, 29(2), str. 66. CrossRef
14. VOSTRÁ, L. - ČERMÁKOVÁ, J. eds. Otázky tvorby práva v České republice, Polské republice a Slovenské republice: sborník příspěvků z mezinárodního vědeckého sympozia "Aktuální otázky tvorby práva v České republice, Polské republice a Slovenské republice" Praha, 29.-30.11.2004. Plzeň: Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2005.
15. WIRTHS, D. Procedural Institutionalization of the Evaluation Through Legal Basis: A New Typology of Evaluation Clauses in Switzerland. Statute Law Review. 2016, 38(1). CrossRef
Dočasnost zákona jako hodnota chtěná a nechtěná is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478
