Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 56 No 1 (2010), 271–284
Smluvní monopol ohledně dodávek rud, surovin nebo zvláštních štěpných materiálů ve Smlouvě o založení Euratomu
[Contractual Monopoly over to Purchase Ores, Source Materials or Special Fissile Materials in the Euratom Treaty]
Jakub Handrlica
published online: 04. 02. 2015
abstract
Contractual Monopoly over to Purchase Ores, Source Materials or Special Fissile Materials in the Euratom Treaty The Euratom Supply Agency (ESA) takes a very specific role in the European Law, where the Euratom Treaty (Treaty) is making it into a unique body created by this founding document almost 50 years ago. Art. 52 of the Treaty grants to ESA two rights that the authors of the Treaty saw as constituting its main instruments. These are the right of option and the exclusive right to enter into contracts. These rights are tangential, not mutually exclusive, as a result of which the Agency may exercise both consecutively. Entering into supply contracts means buying, selling, renting, etc. ESA is the only body able to purchase ores, source materials or special fissile materials from outside the Community. Art. 64 of the Treaty establishes that ESA enters into contracts exclusively for importing and may impose conditions only as regards quantity, quality, delivery dates, transport, etc. ESA cannot enter into contracts involving issues of International Law for which it has no competence: for example contracts establishing the possibility of imposing conditions on re-exporting. There exists a secondary legislation adopted under the rules of the Chapter VI. of the Treaty. The most important are the Rules on balancing the demand and supply of nuclear materials. Under the current Rules, a simplified procedure for application of the Treaty rules is established and contracting parties are negotiating their contracts directly between them and submitting these contracts for conclusion by the ESA. Under this procedure, the powers of ESA to conclude the supply contracts can bee seen as an action of validation. Nevertheless, in the case if the contracting parties do not respect the wording of the Treaty and do not submit the contract for the conclusion by ESA, the contract may be declared void by the national court. Special restrictions were established by the so called Corfu Declaration, adopted jointly by the Council and the Commission in 1994. This was primarily for the purpose of preventing the inflow of very low prized material and enriched uranium into the Community (from the countries of the former Soviet Union in particular) in order to maintain the variability of the supply sources. Briefly, Corfu Declaration provides that the market share of European enrichers in the Community may not fall bellow 80 percent. European users may obtain maximum 20 percent of theirs enrichment supplies from ex-Soviet sources. Most currently, the European Parliament (EP) in its Report on the 50 years of the Treaty has expressed its vision on ESA by suggesting that on the basis of the current Treaty rules it becomes a true observatory of the nuclear fuel market. The EP is calling the strengthening the role of ESA in the context of ensuring the energy security of the European Union.
Smluvní monopol ohledně dodávek rud, surovin nebo zvláštních štěpných materiálů ve Smlouvě o založení Euratomu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478