Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica (AUCI) is the main journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It has been published since 1954 and is one of the traditional law journals with a theoretical focus.
As a general law journal, it publishes longer studies and shorter articles on any relevant issues in legal theory and international, European and national law. AUCI also publishes material relating to current legislative issues. AUCI is a peer-reviewed journal and accepts submissions from both Czech and international authors. Contributions by foreign authors are published in their original language – Slovak, English, German, French.
AUCI is a theoretical journal for questions of state and law. It is published by Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Law, through Karolinum Press. It is published four times a year, the dates of publication can be found here.
Articles published in AUCI undergo an independent peer review process, which is anonymous on both sides. Reviewers from the field give their opinion on the scientific quality of the paper and the suitability of publication in the journal. In the case of comments, the opinion is sent back to the author with the possibility of revising the text (see Guidelines for Authors – Per Review Process for more details).
The AUCI journal (ISSN 0323-0619) is registered in the Czech National Bibliography (kept by the National Library of the Czech Republic) and in the Index to Foreign Legal Periodicals (kept by the American Association of Law Libraries). AUCI has been assigned a periodical registration number MK E 18585.
In 2021 the journal AUCI was the first journal of the Faculty of Law of Charles University to be included in the prestigious international database Scopus. This Elsevier database is the largest abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature in the world. The editors of the journal expect from the inclusion in the elite Scopus database not only an increase in the readership of the journal, but also an increase in interest in the publication of papers by both Czech and foreign authors.
AUCI is an open journal and all its content is published both on the faculty website and on the Karolinum Press website. Access to it is free of charge. The homepage of AUCI is on the Karolinum Press website.
The AUCI journal uses the Creative Commons license: CC BY 4.0.
Long-term archiving of the digital content of the journal is provided by Portico.
AUC IURIDICA, Vol 56 No 1 (2010), 185–202
Právní a procesní nástupnictví ve správním řízení
[Legal and Procedural Succession in Administrative Proceeding]
Helena Prášková
published online: 04. 02. 2015
abstract
Legal and Procedural Succession in Administrative Proceeding Legal and procedural succession in administrative proceedings is not defined by the law, and activities to be pursued, and steps to be taken by administrative bodies, if succession arises, are not governed by legislation. The requirement for procedural succession to occur is the existence of substantive law succession (universal or singular succession). Only such public law rights and duties may pass to a legal successor, which apply to a particular thing, or its properties, or to the relationship between the addressee and a particular thing (acts in rem) if public rights and duties of a property nature are at issue; it is also possible where it is explicitly so provided by a special law (e.g. the passage of liability of a legal entity for an administrative delict under the Protection of Competition Act). Legal succession is, on the other hand, excluded with respect to rights and duties of solely a personal nature. The article deals with the question of whether legal succession may arise due to the fact that the rights and duties at issue are “qualified” to pass to a the legal successor, or whether legal succession should be expressly constituted by the law. Where the capacity to act as a participant in proceedings ceases to exist as a result of universal or singular succession during administrative proceedings, the relevant administrative body must solve the question whether it may continue the proceedings with legal successors of the former participant (should such exist) or whether it is necessary to conduct a modified proceeding (with a reduced number of participants), or whether the proceedings should be discontinued. In the absence of the regulation of procedural succession in administrative law, administrative bodies generally derive the procedural rules from the conception of administrative procedure, from the regulation of procedural succession in other types of procedure and/or from relevant case law. The article circumscribes the commencement of procedural succession, the duty of administrative bodies to consider legal succession by virtue of office and to carry out necessary examination with respect to potential procedural successors, a possibility to suspend proceedings due to that fact, the position of a procedural successor after his joining the proceedings, the impact of the ceased capacity to participate in proceedings upon procedural time-limits, the stages of proceedings where procedural succession is relevant and what the role of procedural succession is at subsequent stages of procedure including administrative execution.
Právní a procesní nástupnictví ve správním řízení is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
230 x 157 mm
periodicity: 4 x per year
print price: 65 czk
ISSN: 0323-0619
E-ISSN: 2336-6478