Právněhistorické studie / Legal History Studies (Charles University journal; below referred to as PHS or Journal) is a scientific journal listed in the international prestigious database SCOPUS. The journal is published by Charles University in Prague under the guarantee of the Department of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It is published by the Karolinum Press. The journal focuses on the field of legal history and related topics.
Issue 1 of the Journal was published by the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences Publishing in June 1955. The Journal was initially published by the Cabinet of Legal History of the Czechoslovak Academy of Science (CSAV), later by the Institute of State and Law (CSAV) and then by the Institute of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University.
PHS is issued three times a year in April, August, and December and it presents original scientific works/papers as well as reviews, annotations and news from the scientific field of legal history. It also introduces annotated texts of a legal history nature. PHS accepts manuscripts from domestic as well as foreign authors. Manuscripts submitted by foreign authors are published in original language, namely in English, Slovak, German, French, Italian or Polish.
PHS (ISSN 0079-4929) is registered in the Czech national ISSN centre (supervised by the State Technical Library). The Journal is registered by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic according to Act No. 46/2000 Sb., on Rights and Liabilities for the Publishing of Periodicals and Change of Some Acts (Press Act), and it is allocated with registration number of periodical press MK E 18813.
PHS is an open journal and ensures open access to scientific data (Open Access). The entire content is released as open to the public on the web pages of the journal.
The journal is archived in Portico.
PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE, Vol 55 No 3 (2025), 11–20
ArticleNoxae deditio delikventného otroka v prameňoch rímskeho práva
[Noxae Deditio of a Delinquent Slave in the Sources of Roman Law]
Róbert Brtko
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689X.2025.29
published online: 10. 12. 2025
abstract
The article examines the Roman law institution of noxae deditio, which essentially served a dual function: (a) it allowed the slave’s master to choose between assuming liability for the damage caused or surrendering the delinquent slave to the injured party; and (b) it enabled the injured party to exploit the slave’s labor, take revenge, and – most importantly – exercise both legal and factual control over him. In the first and second parts of the paper, the author critically analyzes the sources of Justinian addressing the issue of noxal liability of the possessor of a delinquent slave, noting that these sources are at times inconsistent. In the following sections, the author discusses the legal effects of noxae deditio and its execution not only under ius civile but also under ius gentium. In this context, the article analyzes Pomponius’ fragment (D. 50, 7, 18), which describes an analogous situation involving the surrender of an offender who physically attacked an ambassador of a foreign nation present on Roman territory after war had been declared, thereby violating the rules of international wartime law. In the final part, the author emphasizes that the surrender of a slave (as a res mancipi) to the injured party was not strictly limited to the civil owner; later, and under certain conditions, it could also be carried out by a bonitary owner, a bona fide possessor, or even a detentor – such as a usufructuary.
keywords: servus; dominus; bonae fidei possessor; pater patratus; noxae datio
references (17)
1. ARNGIO-RUIZ, V. Istituzioni di diritto romano (Ristampa anastatica). Napoli: Casa ed. dott. Eugenio Jovene, 1991.
2. BIONDI, B. Le actiones noxales nel diritto romano classico. Annali del Seminario Giuridico della R. Univesità di Palermo, 1925, vol. 10.
3. BIONDI, B. Problemi ed ipotesi in tema di actiones noxales. Bullettino dell'Istituto di Diritto Romano, 1928, vol. 36, s. 99-126.
4. Corpo del diritto. Corredato delle note di Dionisio Gotofredo e di C. E. Freiesleben altrimenti Ferromontano con le varianti delle leggi e con la conciliazione delle stesse fra loro. Volume III. Digesto: volume secondo. Napoli: Vincenzo Pezzuti editore, 1856.
5. Corpo del diritto. Corredato delle note di Dionisio Gotofredo e di C. E. Freiesleben altrimenti Ferromontano con le varianti delle leggi e con la conciliazione delle stesse fra loro. Volume VII. Digesto: volume sesto. Napoli: Achille Morelli editore, 1859.
6. Corpo del diritto. Corredato delle note di Dionisio Gotofredo e di C. E. Freiesleben altrimenti Ferromontano con le varianti delle leggi e con la conciliazione delle stesse fra loro. Volume VIII. Codice: volume primo. Napoli: Achille Morelli editore, 1860.
7. Corpo del diritto. Corredato delle note di Dionisio Gotofredo e di C. E. Freiesleben altrimenti Ferromontano con le varianti delle leggi e con la conciliazione delle stesse fra loro. Volume IX. Codice: volume secondo. Napoli: Achille Morelli editore, 1861.
8. DE VISSCHER, F. Le régime romain de la noxalité: de la vengeance collective a la responsabilité individuelle. Bruxelles: Ed. A. De Visscher, 1947.
9. GAIUS, Učebnice práva ve čtyřech knihách, překlad Kincl, J., Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2007.
10. IUSTINIANI AUGUSTI DIGESTA SEU PANDECTAE. DIGESTI O PANDETTE DELL'IMPERATORE GIUSTINIANO. Testo e traduzione a cura di SCHIPANI S. con la collaborazione Lantella L., IV. volumi, Milano: Giuffrè Editore, 2005-2011.
11. KINCL, J. - URFUS, V. - SKŘEJPEK, M. Římské právo. Praha: C. H. Beck, 1995.
12. LENEL, O. Die formeln der actiones noxales. ZSS, 1927, č. 47, s. 1-28. CrossRef
13. LEVY, E. - RABEL, E. Index interpolationum quae in Iustiniani Digestis inesse dicuntur. Tomus I. Weimar: Hermann Böhlaus Hachfolger, 1929. CrossRef
14. PUGLIESE, G. Appunti in tema di azioni noxali. In: Scritti giuridici in onore di F. Carnelutti II. Padova: Cedam, 1950, s. 115-156.
15. PUGLIESE, G. Obbligazione del capofamiglia e responsabilità diretta del colpevole nel regime della nossalità. In: Studi in memoria di E. Albertario I. Milano: Giuffrè, 1953, s. 233-272.
16. PUGLIESE, G. Nuove osservazioni sul regime della nossalità in Roma. Rivista italiana per le scienze giuridiche, 1972, vol. 16, s. 79-101.
17. SKŘEJPEK, M. Římské právo. Systém a instituce. 2. upravené vydání. Plzeň: Aleš Čeněk, 2016.
Noxae deditio delikventného otroka v prameňoch rímskeho práva is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
240 x 170 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 250 czk
ISSN: 0079-4929
E-ISSN: 2464-689X
