Právněhistorické studie / Legal History Studies (Charles University journal; below referred to as PHS or Journal) is a scientific journal listed in the international prestigious database SCOPUS. The journal is published by Charles University in Prague under the guarantee of the Department of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University. It is published by the Karolinum Press. The journal focuses on the field of legal history and related topics.
Issue 1 of the Journal was published by the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences Publishing in June 1955. The Journal was initially published by the Cabinet of Legal History of the Czechoslovak Academy of Science (CSAV), later by the Institute of State and Law (CSAV) and then by the Institute of Legal History of the Faculty of Law of Charles University.
PHS is issued three times a year in April, August, and December and it presents original scientific works/papers as well as reviews, annotations and news from the scientific field of legal history. It also introduces annotated texts of a legal history nature. PHS accepts manuscripts from domestic as well as foreign authors. Manuscripts submitted by foreign authors are published in original language, namely in English, Slovak, German, French, Italian or Polish.
PHS (ISSN 0079-4929) is registered in the Czech national ISSN centre (supervised by the State Technical Library). The Journal is registered by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic according to Act No. 46/2000 Sb., on Rights and Liabilities for the Publishing of Periodicals and Change of Some Acts (Press Act), and it is allocated with registration number of periodical press MK E 18813.
PHS is an open journal and ensures open access to scientific data (Open Access). The entire content is released as open to the public on the web pages of the journal.
The journal is archived in Portico.
PRÁVNĚHISTORICKÉ STUDIE, Vol 54 No 2 (2024), 95–110
Původ dělení věcí na hmotné a nehmotné
[Origins of the Classification of Corporeal and Incorporeal Things]
Sylvie Grulichová
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14712/2464689X.2024.18
published online: 24. 09. 2024
abstract
The article concerns the origins of the well-known classification of corporeal and incorporeal things in Roman law, which follows from the development visible in the legal sources from Institutes of Gaius to the codification of the emperor Justinian. The wide range of non-legal sources dealing with the classification, mostly the philosophical works, from authors as Cicero, Seneca, Gellius, or Lactantius, is taken also into account. Two types of the classification based on the corporeality of things arise from all the analyzed texts. The first one uses the terms corporeal and incorporeal thing, but the legal sources, except the Institutes of Gaius and apart the non-legal ones, almost avoid it. The second one divides things with corpus and the ones consisting of rights and it is represented in the text of Ulpianus or Hermogenianus as well as in several post-classical legal sources. Nevertheless, the codification of the emperor Justinian adopts the formulation according to Gaius, whose proximity to the philosophy categories can be observed so the classification of the corporeal and incorporeal things.
keywords: corporeal thing; incorporeal thing; iura; corpus; Roman law; Gaius
references (46)
1. AUGUSTINUS, De civitate dei. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/augustine/civ8.shtml>.
2. BALDASSARELLI, F. A proposito della rilevanza giuridica della distinzione tra "res corporales" e "res incorporales" nel diritto romano classico. Revue internationale des droits de l'antiquité, 1990, č. 37, str. 71-116.
3. BAVIERA, J. (ed.). Epitome Gai. Firenze, 1940.
4. BIONDI, B. I beni e le loro distinzioni. Torino: Unione tipografico-Editrice torinese, 1953.
5. BONFANTE, P. Corso di diritto romano. Vol. II., La proprietà. Roma: Attilio Sampaolesi.
6. CICERO, Accademica. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/ cicero/acad.shtml>.
7. CICERO, De oficiis. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/ cicero/off.shtml.
8. CICERO, De oratore. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/ cicero/oratore.shtml.
9. CICERO, O povinnostech. Praha: Svoboda, 1970.
10. CICERO, Topica. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/ cicero/topica.shtml.
11. KOPTEV, A. (ed.). Codex Theodosianus. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Constitutiones/Cth09.html.
12. FESTUS. De verborum significatione quae supersunt. Leipzig: Waidman, 1839.
13. KOPTEV, A. (ed.). Fragmenta ex corpore Ulpiani. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <https://ancientrome.ru/ius/library/ulpianus/tituli.htm>.
14. KOPTEV, A. (ed.). Fragmenta vaticana. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <https://ancientrome.ru/ius/library/vatican/FragVat.htm>.
15. GELLIUS, Noctae atticae. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/gellius.html>.
16. GIRARD, P.-F. Manuel elementaire de droit romaine. Paris: Rousseau et Cie, 1918.
17. Corpus iuris civilis iustinianei cum comentariis Accursii. Lyon: Barlet, 1627.
18. GRAESER, A. Řecká filosofie klasického období. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2000.
19. GROSSO, G. Corso di diritto romano. Le cose con una nota di lettura di Filippo Gallo. In: Rivista di diritto romano. 2001.
20. GUZMÁN-BRITO, A. Gaio e la distinzione delle cose in corporali ed incorporali. In: MILAZZO, Francesco (ed.). Gaius noster. Nei segni del Veronese. Milano: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.
21. GUZMÁN-BRITTO, A. Para la historia del derecho subjetivo. Revista Chilena de Derecho, 1975, č. 2, str. 55-68.
22. HADOT, P. Co je antická filosofie?. Praha: Vyšehrad, 2017.
23. HEYROVSKÝ, L. Dějiny a systém soukromého práva římského. Praha: J. Otto, 1910.
24. HULOT, H. (ed.). Corpus Iuris Civilis. Traduction française d'Henry Hulot. Aalen: Scientia verlag, 1979.
25. KÁBRT, J. - KUCHARSKÝ, P. - SCHMANS, R. - VRÁNEK, Č. - WITTICHOVÁ, D. - ZELINKA, V. Latinsko/český slovník. Praha: Leda, 2016.
26. KOENEN, M. Lucretius' Explanation of Hearing in "De rerum natura" IV 524-562. Mnemosyne, 1999, roč. 52, č. 4. CrossRef
27. Lattanzio, Firmiano In: Enciclopedia Italiana, Treccani [online]. 1933 [cit. 2023-04-13]. Dostupné na: <https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/firmiano-lattanzio_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/>.
28. LACTANTIUS, Divinae institutiorum. Documenta Catholica Omnia [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <https://www.documentacatholicaomnia.eu/02m/0240-0320,_Lactantius,_Divinarum_Institutionum_Liber_VII,_MLT.pdf>.
29. LUCRETIUS, De rerum natura. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-02-06]. Dostupné na: <http://thelatinlibrary.com/ lucretius/lucretius1.shtml>.
30. MAURETTE, P. Lucretius, Fracastoro, and the Sense of Touch. The Sixteenth Century Journal, 2018, roč. 45, č. 2, s. 309-330. CrossRef
31. MOMMSEN, T. - KRÜGER, P. (ed.). Corpus iuris civilis. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2021-04-24]. Dostupné na: <https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/corpjurciv.htm>.
32. NICOLLI, M. Tertulliano, Quinto Settimio Florenzio. In: Enciclopedia italiana, Treccani [online]. 1939 [2023-04-13]. Dostupné na: <https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/quinto-settimio-florenzio-tertulliano_%28Enciclopedia-Italiana%29/>.
33. KOPTEV, A. (ed.). Pauli sententiae. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.ancientrome.ru/ius/library/ paul/paul1.htm>.
34. PEROZZI, S. Istituzioni di diritto romano. Firenze: G. Barbera.
35. PLATÓN, Timaios, Kritias. Praha: Oikoymenh, 2008.
36. RABEL, E. - LEVY, E. Index interpolationum vol. III. Weimar: Herman Böhlaus nachfolger, 1935.
37. SCIALOJA, V. Teoria della proprietà nel diritto romano. vol. I. Roma: Anonima romana editoriale, 1933.
38. SENECA, Epistularum moralium ad Lucilium. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/sen/seneca.ep17-18.shtml>.
39. SCOTT, S. (ed.). Corpus Iuris civilis. The Roman Law Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <https://droitromain.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr/Anglica/digest_Scott.htm>.
40. TELLEGEN-COUPERUS, O. - TELLEGEN, J. Artes Urbanae: Roman Law and Rhetoric. In: DU PLESSIS, P. J. (ed.). New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World. Edinburg: Edinburgh University Press, 2013. CrossRef
41. TERTULLIANUS, Adversus Hermogenem. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/tertullian/tertullian.herm.shtml>.
42. TERTULLIANUS, Adversus Marcionem. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/tertullian/tertullian.marcionem.shtml>.
43. TERTULLIANUS, De anima. The Latin Library [online]. [cit. 2023-04-18]. Dostupné na: <http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/tertullian/tertullian.anima.shtml>.
44. TUCILLO, F. Note minime sulla lex Scribonia. Histoire, Espace et Marges de lְ'Antiquité, 2005, č. 4, s. 131-144.
45. ZUCCOTTI, F. I glittodonti del diritto romano. Rivista di Diritto romano, 2003, č. 3.
46. VOCI, P. Dirito ereditario romamo: volume secondo parte specale I. Milano: Giuffre, 1956.
Původ dělení věcí na hmotné a nehmotné is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
240 x 170 mm
periodicity: 3 x per year
print price: 250 czk
ISSN: 0079-4929
E-ISSN: 2464-689X
