Acta Universitatis Carolinae Kinanthropologica (AUC Kinanthropologica) is an international peer reviewed journal for the publication of research outcomes in the humanities, the social sciences and the natural sciences, as applied to kinathropology. It is a multidisciplinary journal accepting only original unpublished articles in English in the various sub-disciplines and related fields of kinanthropology, such as Anthropology, Anthropomotorics, Sports Pedagogy, Sociology of Sport, Philosophy of Sport, History of Sport, Physiology of Sport And Exercise, Physical Education, Applied Physical Education, Physiotherapy, Human Biomechanics, Psychology of Sport, Sports Training and Coaching, Sport Management, etc. The journal also welcomes interdisciplinary articles. The journal also includes reports of relevant activities and reviews of relevant publications.
The journal is abstracted and indexed by CNKI, DOAJ, EBSCO, ERIH PLUS, SPOLIT, SPORTDiscus, and Ulrichsweb.
A linguistically level playing field: English-medium sport officiating between linguistic imperialism and cultural appropriation
announced: 16. 02. 2016
This article revisits four problem areas of the use of English as a lingua franca by sports officials (including coaches, referees, etc.) at international sporting events which were recently identified in an editorial by McNamee in the journal Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. These propositions are revisited by drawing on, inter alia, the theoretical models of ‘linguistic imperialism’ and ‘cultural appropriation’. The argument is made, in particular, that the ability of so-called ‘non-native’ users of English must not be underrated.
keywords: international sports competitions; language; English; inequality; linguistic imperialism; cultural appropriation
1. Barter, C. & Renold, E. (1999). The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research. Social Research Update, 25, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html.
2. Batley, E., Candelier, M., Hermann-Brennecke, G. & Szepe, G. (1993). Language Policies for the World of the Twenty-first Century: report for UNESCO. London: FIPLV (World Federation of Modern Language Associations), http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001302/130228eo.pdf.
3. Chua, A. (2011). Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. London: Penguin.
4. Finch, J. (1987). The Vignette Technique in Survey Research. Sociology, 21, 105–114. CrossRef
5. Hazel, N. (1995). Elicitation Techniques with Young People. Social Research Update, 12, http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU12.html.
6. Hanson, V. D. (2003). Mexifornia. San Francisco: Encounter.
7. Het Nieuwsblad (2013). Elisabeth krijgt bijles […] Frans. Het Nieuwsblad, 08/07/2013, http://www.nieuwsblad.be/cnt/dmf20130707_00650511.
8. Jenkins, R. (1995). Gladstone. London: Macmillan.
9. Kornbeck, J. (2008). A 'Reverse Mission' Perspective on Second-Language Classes as Part of Social Work Education Programmes. Portularia (Revista de Trabajo Social), 8(2), 65–77.
10. Kornbeck, J. (2015). Allophones vulnérables? Sport anglais-moyen exerçant des fonctions entre impérialisme linguistique et appropriation culturelle. (Vulnerable Allophones? English-medium sport officiating between linguistic imperialism and cultural appropriation.) In: B. Andrieu (Ed.) Vocabulaire international de philosophie du sport. Tome 2: Les nouvelles techniques. Paris: L'Harmattan (Collection: Le mouvement des savoirs), pp. 195–211.
11. Kwarteng, K. (2011). Ghosts of Empire. London: Bloomsbury.
12. Macaulay, T. B. (1835). Minute by the Hon'ble T. B. Macaulay, dated the 2nd February 1835, http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00generallinks/macaulay/txt_minute_education_1835.html.
13. Masani, Z. (2013). Macaulay: Britain's Liberal Imperialist. NY: Bodley Head.
14. McNamee, M. (2013). Sports officiating, linguistic bias and fair play. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 7(4), 365–367. CrossRef
15. Ostick, C. (2015). Top 10 cricket sledges of all time. Manchester Evening News, 10(18), 25 Jun 2015, http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/cricket/top-10-cricket-sledges-time-9523425.
16. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Phillipson, R. (2010). Linguistic Imperialism Continued. London: Routledge.
18. Porzucki, N. (2014). How do 32 teams from 32 countries communicate at the World Cup? The World in Words, June 24, 2014, http://www.pri.org/stories/2014-06-24/how-do-32-teams-32-countries-communicate-world-cup.
19. Rubenfeld, J. & Chua, A. (2014). The Triple Package. London: Penguin.
20. Scafidi, S. (2005). Who Owns Culture? New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
21. Woodhead, C. (2009). A Desolation of Learning. Hampshire: Pencil-Sharp Publishing.
22. Young, J. O. & Brunk, C. G. (Eds.) (2012). The Ethics of Cultural Appropriation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
157 x 230 mm
published: 2 x per year
print price: 190 czk